So you're saying that because some people on the and other forums don't agree exactly with you're method to achieve liberty that these people are agents of the government?
I don't think so.
Did you mean "some people on [this and] the and other forums"?
The ultimate purpose of free speech is separate from the method of achieving liberty through a lawful and peaceful revolution. It is a logical basis and enabler for that revolution however.
Consider the idea that many here are not stalling by adhearing to you're narrow guidelines to understanding freedom.
That is too general of a description. I am only defining one specific freedoms PURPOSE in maintaining freedom. It has to do with the people educating themselves and forming opinion.
Many here have seen their attempts to enlighten others to the idea of liberty fail over and over again and have become jaded to the idea of a peaceful solution.
I've noticed that is used as an excuse. However such excuse disregards the purpose of free speech which is separate from the specific solution that implements it.
I have not lost hope yet and I believe, as Dr. Ron Paul does, that enlightenment is imperative and possible.
Enlightenment comes with knowledge. Knowledge comes with information. Information requires understanding before it is knowledge. Understanding requires Q & A to form opinion upon the information to realize that it is actual knowledge and not simply opinion.
These things are the purpose of free speech being served and that purpose is abridged.
Consider also the the idea that many of these people probably do agree with you're understanding of the importance of free speech and are at the same time witnessing the population around them slide in to stupidity and disinterst of even the most fundamental aspects of a free society.
Yes, but do not omit that while they do agree, the covert agents foster an environment of uncertainty while also having no plan of viable lawful strategy to secure liberty. Which of course they are unaccountable to addressing despite the fact that the agents present a unified front if ambiguity based in appreciation and acceptance of DISTRACTION as being the only functional activism.
Consider again the idea that it is possible that the only thing that might jog the interests of the sleeping masses about the ideas of liberty is a full and violent reset of the entire system. Full crash/correction.
Those would be the perceptions the NWO and it's agents want people to hold. The NWO is specifically poised to survive the crash of our "system" and then be the only power offering aid at that point. Such is the FEMA camps. The NWO works to crash the system
I hope not, but you would be wrong to discard the men who could foresee such a scenario as "agents", when if this path did become reality, they may be you're closest alias.
"May be" is important. Distinguishing them from agents without an absolutely solid commitment to something which supports Liberty is not possible.
THIS is exactly why I seek agreement and acceptance of the ultimate purpose of free speech.
Witnessing such agreement is in itself a powerful motivating example to agreement with the same. Agents will NEVER set such an example.
Notice, the detractors to this agreement have never described any damage the agreement might cause. They have never defined any sacrifice or risk to making the agreement, but still do not make it despite the fact of the 1st amendment.
EXPLAIN THAT!
Just because they see a trend unfolding does not mean they promote it.
Nobody knows what the future holds. If people like the path you take they just may follow it.
Agents work to assure no such trend is easily visible by obsfucation of it.
Sheep require that ease.
Actually scientific projection of conditions over time result in accurate predictions absent unforeseen interventions. The future can be predicted very closely depending on conditions and how far in the future the projection is directed to.
