A Message to the Liberty Movement

[HVACTech]

My brain is already broken. There's nothing these goobers can do to make me any worse.

I may seem to post angry but I chose that voice on here years ago. It simplifies things.

Being nice to people with no loyalty, respect, or intellectual honesty of any kind is a waste of time. You just have to reply to one set of words at a time. Don't think about what they are going to say next or if they'll change their mind. It's pointless. Half the people are just trolling for laughs anyway. You have to write for the general reader. Someone who +reps you one day will attack you the next.

I haven't seen any Ron Paul Republican flavored posts but maybe 1 in 100. I see shitloads of collectivism, inciting of violence, white supremacists, liars, and hosts of others, but the old guard seems to have either left or gone into hiding.

We could speculate that this is engineered, that there are in fact disinfo agents in here, but doesn't matter. Result is the same whether it's by design or natural forces.

Just keep speaking the truth the best you know how. As Nock said, we aren't writing for the masses, we're writing for the remnant.

Osan has sockpuppets!

 

[wizardwatson]

Osan has sockpuppets!

And how would one go about proving or disproving such a thing?

And either way who would care enough to pay attention or remember?

 

[HVACTech]

And how would one go about proving or disproving such a thing?

And either way who would care enough to pay attention or remember?

well, Honey, you are both obtuse and verbose
you are both "wizards" with letters behind your name!

Osan at LEAST pretends to be a high level IT tech.
who can use Entropy in a sentence, but NOT explain it to me.
I can do this thing that I speak of in about oh, 8 or 9 words. sugardumplins!

 

[CCTelander]

well, Honey, you are both obtuse and verbose
you are both "wizards" with letters behind your name!

Osan at LEAST pretends to be a high level IT tech.
who can use Entropy in a sentence, but NOT explain it to me.
I can do this thing that I speak of in about oh, 8 or 9 words. sugardumplins!

The more of your posts that I read the more convinced I become that you're flat out batshit crazy, "sugardumplins."

This neighborhood has really gone to the dogs.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

you bashed me pretty hard for speaking in support of MY Constitution the other day.
many of your compatriots joined in.
Ronin Truth had the balls to suggest that I look up the "anti-federalist FOUNDERS"
so, I did.
bad news, can YOU make a reasonable argument..
that anyone who identifies with or as an "anti-federalist" is NOT in DIRECT OPPOSITION to the CONSTITUTION?

do the Pauls support the Constitution? can YOU spot the paradox?

who is the most popular member BY FAR at RPF's?

I parse my words and try to speak concisely. if my direct observation is correct..
how is this website NOT an embarrassment to the Pauls?

I quoted and posted this once already, only to find it gone later in the day. Embarrassment, probably?

you sir, are FAR more than just an ignorant pig.
you are shameless in your ignorance and bellicose in your nature about a document that you DO NOT UNDERSTAND.

you have been here since 09, bashing the Constitution... and it is just now occurring to you that... you do not know what the fuck you are talking about.

I warned you to Google HVAC/R before bullshitting me.
and then you have the audacity to blurt out this BS.

hey look! Osan can use a big word in a sentence!
he can also use it in a desultory and condescending manner!

I will go first. "cold" does not exist" your turn!
(psst, we are discussing Entropy.. )

our Constitution is an anti-statist document.
it functions as a contract between the states and the federal gov't.
it is in fact, the rule of law in our republic.
it is an enumerated powers document. as such, it does NOT apply to the people.
it can be argued that the BOR does, but not the federal constitution.
violation of a contract, does NOT indicate a flaw in the contract.

I question your IT credentials sir.
IF you truly are a high level IT guy, you should know by now who you are addressing.

I have demonstrated ability to understand complex operating systems. I can also use and apply this knowledge to different operating systems, under varying conditions.

you sir, are about as complex as a hair dryer.
~hugs~
lulz!!

I anxiously await YOU to explain Entropy to me...
I will make it EASY for you pissant.
we will use YOUR Information tech definition.

I've not seen accountability from osan, but I've seen lots of obfuscation and evasion. It is does seem to be very deceptively against the the principles of the constitution while pretending to stand for it.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

I am sorry Honey.



google is fucking with me.

sorry for the + rep. I will fix that when I can. ~hugz~

Hah hah ha.

How many times have I mistakenly given +rep to those I've trying to quote in reply. Got a 0.25" space and 0.375" finger tip. Oh, and AF sent a +rep saying, "Everytime you call me an agent I'll give you -rep(?). OMG!

I guess it will take YEARS for the sincere, wanna be agents to fiqure out all they gotta do to NOT be an agent is uncondititonally agree with and accept that the purpose of free speech is to enable the unity needed to alter or abolish government destructive to unalienable rights. AF ain't figured it out yet, OR, he's an agent.

An agent will NEVER agree that the purpose of free speech is to enable unity. An agents basic agenda is to prevent unity, HTF could they agree that the purpose of free speech is to enable unity. Agents are prohibited from contributing to unity by participating in it!

However, there are lots of wanna-be's that hang out with agents, not knowing it of course, but the follow them like sheep always looking for hugz.

 

[HVACTech]

The more of your posts that I read the more convinced I become that you're flat out batshit crazy, "sugardumplins."

This neighborhood has really gone to the dogs.

OK, YOUR turn, please explain Entropy to me sir.

I will NOT call you "sugardumplins until you declare yourself batshit crazy in you sig line Honey.

 

[wizardwatson]

OK, YOUR turn, please explain Entropy to me sir.

I will NOT call you "sugardumplins until you declare yourself batshit crazy in you sig line Honey.

Entropy isn't real. It's an illusion created by our inability to see the entire system.

 

[Working Poor]

ETA: FFS at least Fire11 was funny...

At least. If you can't be funny while being an ass the STFU.

 

[Anti Federalist]

At least. If you can't be funny while being an ass the STFU.

I'm not trying to be funny.

I tried to reach out to both of the goofy bastards I mentioned in this thread, only to rebuffed by waves of grammatically challenged crazy.

Not even sure why I'm checking back in here...

 

[Origanalist]

I'm not trying to be funny.

I tried to reach out to both of the goofy bastards I mentioned in this thread, only to rebuffed by waves of grammatical challenged crazy.

Not even sure why I'm checking back in here...

It's hard to look away from a train wreck.

 

[Anti Federalist]

It's hard to look away from a train wreck.

A train wreck is more fun as well.

 

[Working Poor]

I'm not trying to be funny.

I tried to reach out to both of the goofy bastards I mentioned in this thread, only to rebuffed by waves of grammatically challenged crazy.

Not even sure why I'm checking back in here...

I know I agree with you but for some reason the BS is getting so loud that it is unbearable. osan of all people to be accused of being an infiltrator is just really over the top. I was trying to lighten the mood here. I wish this thread could be closed....

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

I know I agree with you but for some reason the BS is getting so loud that it is unbearable. osan of all people to be accused of being an infiltrator is just really over the top. I was trying to lighten the mood here. I wish this thread could be closed....

There are two things that really work well together for getting things done.

One, critical thinking. Two, absolutes.

Critical thinking with absolutes works. The dumbing down and the covert manipulation of government agents exist to prevent critical thinking with absolutes.

Logically, when I find a poster who acts as if they stand for constitutional government, but then refuses to engage the critical thinking with absolutes needed to effectively oppose the infiltration of the federal government that usurps the constitution, I've got to point out what they are doing.

Cognitive infiltration is designed to prevent proper and complete cognition in the process of critical thinking by engaging, passionately, everything BUT that which will enable the unity and methods required to effectively oppose the infiltration of government and usurpation of the constitution. That is what osan is doing and there is support for that here. Cognitive infiltration works with groups to engage social instincts. Your use of the word "mood" indicates your instincts have been engaged in a way detrimental to effective unity.

That IS the intention of cognitive infiltration. How much sacrifice would osan suffer by accepting that free speech has a purpose? Has osan said why he is not accepting or even addressing the purpose of free speech? No.
If you know how badly a lawful and peaceful revolution is needed, and understand that unity will be required to get it done, and are doing critical thinking that this post is outlining, another instinct should be rising. Anger, or the question, "Why is osan not accepting that free speech has the purpose of enabling unity". Accountability is everything when determining and completing the path of critical thinking.

I do what I do because I do stand to defend the American constitution. Maybe osan does not know what he is doing. In that case, if he does stand for the constitution, then I'm doing him a favor.

The absolute I refer to is unity. It is absolutely needed to alter or abolish the government usurping the constitution. If we are to have the lawful and peaceful revolution we need to defend rights, we need unity.

If osan can explain how the people are to alter or abolish without being unified in doing it, great. Osan has had a chance, but has not.

If osan can explain how unity is created without free speech serving the purpose of enabling it, great. Osan has had the chance but has not.

Osan has evaded the issue. Critical thinking indicates that the infiltrating government would implement agents to infiltrate web forums to prevent or discourage unity. Osan is not contributing to unity by accepting how to create it himself and is not providing alternatives. The evasion serves to discourage viewers from participating in agreement upon the purpose of free speech.

Critical thinking indicates either osan does not know what osan is doing OR osan is working against unity required for a lawful and peaceful revolution defending the constitution by use of its intentions.

 

[Anti Federalist]

I know I agree with you but for some reason the BS is getting so loud that it is unbearable. osan of all people to be accused of being an infiltrator is just really over the top. I was trying to lighten the mood here. I wish this thread could be closed....

Well, I'd hate to see your thread get closed, so I'll knock it off.

But before I do, I'll jump over Chris Brown's reply to you and address his response here.

I understand his point, even though he has made it so convoluted so as to almost be almost unintelligible.

I don't think anybody disagrees that free speech is critical to unifying people in opposition to this government, this tyranny, we have right now.

I think where his train of thought is missing the station is that there will not be any free speech, unifying or otherwise, in opposition to this tyranny, until people realize that yes, it is, in fact a tyranny.

That is what I and so many other are trying to do: get people to realize and centralize that fact.

You can't get a fire brigade organized until people realize there is a fire.

Sound the alarm.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

Well, I'd hate to see your thread get closed, so I'll knock it off.

But before I do, I'll jump over Chris Brown's reply to you and address his response here.

I understand his point, even though he has made it so convoluted so as to almost be almost unintelligible.

I don't think anybody disagrees that free speech is critical to unifying people in opposition to this government, this tyranny, we have right now.

I think where his train of thought is missing the station is that there will not be any free speech, unifying or otherwise, in opposition to this tyranny, until people realize that yes, it is, in fact a tyranny.

That is what I and so many other are trying to do: get people to realize and centralize that fact.

You can't get a fire brigade organized until people realize there is a fire.

Sound the alarm.

Poor analogy because osan, by the way osan posts, knows there is a fire.

 

[Origanalist]

I know I agree with you but for some reason the BS is getting so loud that it is unbearable. osan of all people to be accused of being an infiltrator is just really over the top. I was trying to lighten the mood here. I wish this thread could be closed....

Closing the thread won't stop it.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Poor analogy because osan, by the way osan posts, knows there is a fire.

Of course he knows there is a fire.

I know there is a fire.

Pretty much all of the people you run around here accusing of being government agents know there is a fire.

We're trying to wake up sleepwalking AmeriKa and get them to realize there is a fire, a great and all consuming conflagration that is fixing to consume all of us and to, for fuck's sake, man the goddamn pumps!

 

[Natural Citizen]

Some of Brown's points are actually very good and well thought as far as actual process. And I agree with him in scope but I wouldn't go so far as to place the people that he is placing into the phenomenon. As well, I wouldn't necessarily just assume that it would be government infiltration. It'd be more in tune with private entities.

So, good points and actually a great observation as a whole (meaning the way this stuff goes down sometimes on boards like this) when it comes to this stuff, but, as I said, I wouldn't tie the people that Brown ties into the phenomenon as he does here.

 

[dude58677]

Why don't we stick to the original topic as to how to get these grand juries put in place?