60 Minutes to Report on 28 Pages Said to Link 9/11 and Saudi Arabia's Government


That's part of his truth. That's not the whole truth. If it was the whole truth then he was lying when he said, in answer to why he didn't come out with the truth about 9/11, that it was "too controversial for me." If it was the whole truth then he was lying when he said that he found the fall of WTC 7 suspicious. I don't believe Dr. Paul was lying either time thus I don't accept your conclusion that your quote of part of his truth was "his truth." I think the truth is that you yourself can't handle the truth.
 

One more thing LibertyEagle. I'm reporting you (again) to the moderators. This neg rep from you is a clear violation of the forum procedures.

Mischaracterizing Dr. Paul's beliefs.

I did not mischaracterize Dr. Paul's beliefs in the slightest. You do not have the right to basically call me a liar when I all have done is state the facts. And the facts are that Dr. Paul is on video saying that the reason he didn't come out with "the truth" about 9/11 is that is is too controversial for him and that Ron Paul is suspicious of how WTC 7 fell. You will no longer be able to get away with distorting what I or others say and then turn around and basically call us liars.
 
Can you find- at any time- Ron Paul saying he believed the US government was behind or directly involved in the events of 9/11? I find many quotes saying the opposite. Has he always been lying about his own personal beliefs? What else was he lying about?

 
Last edited:
60 minutes is a government mouthpiece. Why after all these years are they talking about it now? Did the reporters just suddenly run into this story?
 
60 minutes is a government mouthpiece. Why after all these years are they talking about it now? Did the reporters just suddenly run into this story?

Infighting among factions--it's an election year.
 
That's part of his truth. That's not the whole truth. If it was the whole truth then he was lying when he said, in answer to why he didn't come out with the truth about 9/11, that it was "too controversial for me." If it was the whole truth then he was lying when he said that he found the fall of WTC 7 suspicious. I don't believe Dr. Paul was lying either time thus I don't accept your conclusion that your quote of part of his truth was "his truth." I think the truth is that you yourself can't handle the truth.

No Drake. I just think it's important not to put words into his mouth and jump to conclusions.

One more thing LibertyEagle. I'm reporting you (again) to the moderators. This neg rep from you is a clear violation of the forum procedures.

Mischaracterizing Dr. Paul's beliefs.
How so? However, I'm thinking your threat in your neg rep to me is. I didn't report ya though.

I did not mischaracterize Dr. Paul's beliefs in the slightest. You do not have the right to basically call me a liar when I all have done is state the facts. And the facts are that Dr. Paul is on video saying that the reason he didn't come out with "the truth" about 9/11 is that is is too controversial for him and that Ron Paul is suspicious of how WTC 7 fell. You will no longer be able to get away with distorting what I or others say and then turn around and basically call us liars.

Calm down. I did not call you a liar. I do think though that it's not right to read things into what Dr. Paul said. That's all.
 
Last edited:
No Drake. I just think it's important not to put words into his mouth and jump to conclusions.

No miss whoever you are. I didn't put any words in Dr. Paul's mouth. I quoted him directly. You are the one jumping to conclusions as to what he things the truth is.

How so? However, I'm thinking your threat in your neg rep to me is. I didn't report ya though.

How so? Because it's a dishonest attack on me. I did not mischaracterize anything. And I don't care if you didn't report me. Others have for my simply telling the truth. So I'm going to report you when you don't. You did send the nasty neg rep about my "Not reading Bryan's memo" so spare me the platitudes.


Calm down. I did not call you a liar.

I am calm and yes you did and this isn't the first time.
 
No miss whoever you are. I didn't put any words in Dr. Paul's mouth. I quoted him directly. You are the one jumping to conclusions as to what he things the truth is.

How so? Because it's a dishonest attack on me. I did not mischaracterize anything. And I don't care if you didn't report me. Others have for my simply telling the truth. So I'm going to report you when you don't. You did send the nasty neg rep about my "Not reading Bryan's memo" so spare me the platitudes.

I am calm and yes you did and this isn't the first time.

I don't want to fight with you. So, flame on.
 
Can you find- at any time- Ron Paul saying he believed the US government was behind or directly involved in the events of 9/11? I find many quotes saying the opposite. Has he always been lying about his own personal beliefs? What else was he lying about?



Straw man argument. I never said Ron Paul said he believed the U.S. government was behind 9/11. For the record nobody believes that, not even Alex Jones. He has multiple times said he believes it was a rogue faction within the government.

Furthermore I haven't said Ron Paul believed that any faction was involved. He might believe that. He might not. What we do know, from his own words, is that he hasn't come out with the full truth of what he believes about 9/11 because that is "too controversial" for him. Now, if he had already stated everything he believed to be true about 9/11, as LibertyEagle is asserting, then he should have said in this video "I've already come out with everything I believe to be true about 9/11". He didn't. Please watch.



Further we know, based on Ron Paul's own public statement, that he is, or at least one time was, suspicious about how WTC 7 fell.



So what we know to be the truth about what Ron Paul believes about 9/11?

1) He doesn't feel comfortable saying everything he knows or believes about 9/11 because it is too controversial.

2) He thinks, or at least thought, that the collapse of WTC 7 is suspicious.

You can post a million other videos of Ron Paul saying this or that about 9/11 but that will in no way diminish the truth of those two facts that I keep pointing out and that you and others keep having trouble coming to grips with.
 
Now, if he had already stated everything he believed to be true about 9/11, as LibertyEagle is asserting, then he should have said in this video "I've already come out with everything I believe to be true about 9/11". He didn't.

You just had to go on and mention my name and attribute things to me that I never said. :rolleyes:

I never said what you claim, Drake. But, Dr. Paul was clear about what he did not believe.
 
Last edited:
You just had to go on and mention my name and attribute things to me that I never said. :rolleyes:

I never said what you claim, Drake. But, Dr. Paul was clear about what he did not believe.

Ron Paul has clearly stated that he does believe that WTC 7 is suspicious. You might not like it, but he did. And :rolleyes: right back at you.
 
Infighting among factions--it's an election year.

Something like this doesn't get run on 60 minutes without White House approval. Maybe Obama taking one last jab at the Clintons? After all, the Clintons and the Saudi Arabians are good friends. Paul Ryan is in Saudi Arabia at the moment too.
 
some tubes are getting posted of part of the 60 Minutes program . . .


.
 
Link to the 60 minutes segment on the 28 pages concealed from American citizens: http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/28-pages/

Watched the whole thing. What I get from those who have read it but can't say what's there other than to make some generalizations is that some Saudi officials and charitable organizations were involved in funding and training the "hijackers". Well "duh"... I think we all know this but it would sure be nice to see some names...
 
Obama to decide whether to declassify 9/11 documents 'exposing Saudi connection to the attacks' within 60 days

By Ollie Gillman For Dailymail.com

Published: 08:42 EST, 13 April 2016

President Obama will decide whether to declassify 28 pages of sealed documents that are rumored to expose Saudi Arabia's connection to the 9/11 attacks within 60 days, a senator claimed last night.

Former Florida senator Bob Graham said the White House made it clear to him that a decision on the secret files would be made in the next two months.

Graham told Fox News he was 'pleased that after two years this matter is about to come to a decision by the president'.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...xposing-Saudi-connection-attacks-60-days.html
 
Obama to decide whether to declassify 9/11 documents 'exposing Saudi connection to the attacks' within 60 days

By Ollie Gillman For Dailymail.com

Published: 08:42 EST, 13 April 2016

President Obama will decide whether to declassify 28 pages of sealed documents that are rumored to expose Saudi Arabia's connection to the 9/11 attacks within 60 days, a senator claimed last night.

Former Florida senator Bob Graham said the White House made it clear to him that a decision on the secret files would be made in the next two months.

Graham told Fox News he was 'pleased that after two years this matter is about to come to a decision by the president'.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...xposing-Saudi-connection-attacks-60-days.html
If they get released, I would expect to see large chunks of black magic marker.
 
Back
Top