jeffhenderson
Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2007
- Messages
- 79
Romney and Paul have the most money. It takes longer to count and junk.
I think there might be some information regarding the strategy RP is taking in the FEC reports so they are filing at the last possible moment so it gives the other campaigns less time to look through it.
I am hoping like crazy you are correct on this...nearly $17million was spent somewhere.
Better if it wasn't
someone said they had to be in by 5pm east. It is just taking them a long time to get them uploaded onto the system.
Well from Jesse Benton's mouth he said they had about $8 million left at the beginning of January...so, I want to see this report to see where the other $17million went.
MERREL LYNCH 200.00
MERRILL CORPORATION 1,000.00
MERRILL LYNCH 39,125.00
nuggets from the McCain report - his highest employer total came from a firm he probably would like to bail out (you econ guys know what i'm talking about)
well, we beat McCain. He only got 9 mil in the 4th quarter.
I thought I saw 37million..
sorry. i'm talking about his (McCain's) call to "help" the mortgage market out - and hence the bonds that are killing Merrill's earnings would suddenly appreciate in value and everyone would look pretty again.
i have a friend on Wall St. that is just furious with Goldman. According to my friend, Goldman sold a lot of mortgage-backed securities and recommended these, but took no positions of their own, just comissions. Hence, when market woke up about mortgages (that Goldman had essentially recomended), Goldman Sachs came out fine.
Goldman was about the only Wall St. firm that didn't get their ass handed to them last quarter.
sorry to ramble, i want a report.
GS is just a smarter firm than a lot of places, it sounds like your friend is just bitter.
Also, the losses at Merill aren't from 'bonds'.
7. Total Receipts This Period 9,969,292.21
I think the $37 is for the entire year.
Almost 10mil for McCain on Q4
Coincidence that all of the "front runners" (both current and past) got a TON of campaign money from Goldman Sachs? I think not.
Rich people with spare money able to finance political campaigns of their choice? Well, that's definitely some sort of conspiracy afoot...
Also, define "TON" please, with sources.