It’s my opinion that stocks really don’t do as well in the long run as most of us think. If you’re a good trader than yes stocks are great but if you’re a buy and hold investor it’s not quite that cut and dry. It’s my opinion that the indexes and prospectus overstate gains and that creates the feeling that people are making lots of money even if it’s not entirely true. Honestly if you look at the stocks of companies that have been in business for long periods of time the chances are good that a savings account has delivered a better return. Even today with the stock indexes up 50% from the lows early in this decade many stocks are still at a lower price than they were in 2003. The Dow regularly rotates in good industries and cycles out the bad companies overstating a typical investors returns. I think only one of the original company’s is still in the index (GE). Many of the others eventually became worthless stocks over the years. Mutual funds do the same thing closing bad funds and dropping the investor’s money into the remaining funds with good return records. They just keep creating new funds to slowly remove the bad performing funds from the record. Unfortunately few people ever actually get the returns that are advertised over time. Plus math works well at overstating gains and making losses look smaller, just think about it a 100% gain is erased with a 50% loss, it doesn’t sound like a big deal but this also confuses things. I’m not saying don’t put any money in the stock market but if you think about the current value of old gold coins versus those hot rail road stocks of 100 year ago I think all investors should consider owning some commodities in a lifetime investment plan.
Just my two cents..
Just my two cents..