400,000 march for "climate change" in NYC

[osan]

how on earth do they get so many to show up for something like that?

Because Americans have been very successfully rewired to find stupidity impossibly attractive. There is an enormous subset population that appears unable to resist idiocy. The more profoundly vacuous and inane a given issue or thing, the more hopelessly draw they are.

You have to give Themme kudos for having pulled this off with such complete strength. Those poor dumb bastards which we call our "fellow Americans" never saw it coming and will never be able to until a millisecond before the blade enters their necks, which I believe will rate quite the mercy. OTOH, when you're that stupid the wretchedness of your profoundly mere existence is hidden from you.

In the immortal words of the Wicked Witch of the West: "What a world, what a world..."

 

[Origanalist]

Is any of them non-commie?

Negative , all commies .

Is that a serious question?

Climate Movement Drops Mask, Admits Communist Agenda

ommunists along with a few environmental groups staged a “People’s Climate Rally” in Oakland, California on Sunday, September 21, in conjunction with the larger “People’s Climate March” in New York City on the same day.

Wait — did I say communists? Isn’t that a bit of an exaggeration?


Well…no.

At the New York event, many people noticed that gee, there sure are a lot of communists at this march. But in Oakland — always on the cutting edge — the entire “climate change” movement at last fully, irrevocably and overtly embraced communism as its stated goal. Any concerns about “optics” or operating in “stealth mode” were abandoned.

The “climate change” “crisis” is now nothing but the latest justification for “total revolution” and getting rid of capitalism forever.

Yes, capitalism itself is the problem. The primary message of the People’s Climate Rally was this: Climate change is caused by capitalism, and merely attempting to reform capitalism will not stop global warming; it is impossible to work within the existing system if we want to save the planet. We must replace it with a new social and economic system entirely.

Until recently, those attacking the capitalist system as the cause of global warming were intentionally a little vague as to what will replace it if we are to solve the problem. But on Sunday in Oakland, that curtain was drawn back and the new system was finally revealed: Communism. Or at least hardcore socialism as Marx defined it — the necessary transitional phase before true complete communism (i.e. no private property, no families, no individualism). Most countries we tend to think of as “communist” actually self-defined as “socialist”: The USSR, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, for example, was (as its name reveals) socialist. I point out this detail in case anybody reading this article thinks that the “socialism” advocated at the rally was merely some kind of squishy soft-hearted semi-capitalism; no, it is the same type of socialism one finds in places generally thought of as communist.

Below you will find irrefutable proof that communist ideologies, organizations and phraseologies have completely moved to the forefront of the “climate change” movement. (I was originally tempted to say that the communists, as they are wont to do, have merely “co-opted” environmentalism. But that would imply that the goal of global warming scaremongering was something other than “destroying capitalism” in the first place. At this point I now know that destroying capitalism has always been the goal; the only thing that changed on Sunday is that the mask was dropped.)

This proof will necessarily entail posting a lot of photographs; in situations like this, the only way to conclusively demonstrate a point is through repetition of evidence. One could summarize the evidence with a few shorthand images, but that would leave open the possibility that the case was being overstated. To quash that counter-argument before it arises, I will post lots and lots and lots and lots of images from all over the rally, from the sponsors, to the attendees, to the booths, to the speakers, to show beyond any doubt that the entire rally was thoroughly saturated with communism and socialism to the point where these ideologies were the overarching theme of the event.

Ready? All the photos below were taken at the People’s Climate Rally in Oakland on September 21, 2014.

There is a LOT more at....http://pjmedia.com/zombie/2014/09/2...mask-admits-communist-agenda/?singlepage=true

 

[Chester Copperpot]

If you watch the accompanying DiCaprio interview, Bernie Sanders says that climate change is now become a national defense issue according to the DOD..

Well if its national defense, then they dont need any congressional approval.. theyll just start doing shit.

 

[devil21]

You don't know what you're talking about, so yes, it matters.

Matters not what I do or don't know since it succeeded in derailing the AGW global warming taxation agenda and that makes me happy.

Who is they?

Mainly Al Gore and his cronies and the scientists that were paid to push the AGW taxation agenda using faux science. Especially the ones that tried to use media smear campaigns to damage the reputation of dissenting scientists, instead of debating their opponents on the merits.

By what standard do you judge whether they are impartial science?

What is this, 20 questions? The observant can always tell a troll by the fact that they do nothing but ask questions, hoping to find something to poke holes in, in the reply, instead of making their own arguments in favor of their view.

Saying it a million times won't make it true. I just called you out on your ignorance and gullibility, you bought the media lie that climate exposed some lie or conspiracy, you don't even know what the emails were referring to. YOU are the one who paid no attention, or else you'd actually know what 'hide the decline' meant, you'd actually know CRU e-mails exposed nothing about temperature data, CRU is not any authority on temperature publishing...etc.

Oh yeah that reminded me of the other troll hallmark. Hurling personal insults instead of actually making an argument in favor of the troll's viewpoint. I paid plenty of attention. Once I realized that AGW global warming was a fraud I stopped worrying about it. Proven right too since it then morphed into "climate change" when the models were shown to be bogus, the scientists shown to be on the gravy train and shown to be unethical.

Sun deniers? What evidence about solar activity influencing the climate are sun deniers denying and ignoring?

All of it. The climate always changes and the sun always changes. Seems like basic common sense to see the correlation. I was physically affected by the recent CMEs that hit Earth but I'm supposed to believe sun fluctuations are less responsible for temperature and climate changes than my car is. LOL ok.

Dunno about you but it's damn cold here today for only the 2nd day of fall. I should go let my car idle in the driveway for a few hours to warm things up! Perhaps you should kill yourself so you stop polluting the earth with that poisonous damaging CO2 gas.

 

[PRB]

Matters not what I do or don't know since it succeeded in derailing the AGW global warming taxation agenda and that makes me happy.

That's the spirit, I don't care about the truth, I just care about my agenda.

Mainly Al Gore and his cronies and the scientists that were paid to push the AGW taxation agenda using faux science.

Who were these scientists paid to push an agenda? I bet you don't know and don't care.

Especially the ones that tried to use media smear campaigns to damage the reputation of dissenting scientists, instead of debating their opponents on the merits.

Name the scientist(s) who published something worth debating which deserved to be heard and not smeared/discredited/ridiculed. Again, I bet you don't know and don't care.

What is this, 20 questions? The observant can always tell a troll by the fact that they do nothing but ask questions, hoping to find something to poke holes in, in the reply, instead of making their own arguments in favor of their view.

No, you're thinking about a denier. I actually know my stuff which is why it's easy to ask a few questions and expose how little you know/care, at least admit you only care about taxation.

Oh yeah that reminded me of the other troll hallmark. Hurling personal insults instead of actually making an argument in favor of the troll's viewpoint. I paid plenty of attention.

You're the one calling people liars. If you paid attention you'd actually know what "hide the decline" means.

Once I realized that AGW global warming was a fraud I stopped worrying about it. Proven right too since it then morphed into "climate change" when the models were shown to be bogus, the scientists shown to be on the gravy train and shown to be unethical.

This again, that REALLY proves you don't know what you're talking about. "Climate change" is not a new phrase. What do you think IPCC stands for?

All of it. The climate always changes and the sun always changes.

Except the sun rises and sets every day, right?

Seems like basic common sense to see the correlation.

Except there isn't.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/solar-activity-sunspots-global-warming-basic.htm

I was physically affected by the recent CMEs that hit Earth but I'm supposed to believe sun fluctuations are less responsible for temperature and climate changes than my car is. LOL ok.

CO2 and greenhouse gases are not physically affecting you?

Dunno about you but it's damn cold here today for only the 2nd day of fall.

There we go again, ignorance, plain ignorance, you think that global warming means
-it'll always be warmer and only warmer
-temperature is measured by your own subjective feeling of "it's cold cuz i sez so"

I should go let my car idle in the driveway for a few hours to warm things up! Perhaps you should kill yourself so you stop polluting the earth with that poisonous damaging CO2 gas.

I should kill myself because I don't deny global warming? Did you hear me ONCE say I am OK with carbon taxing?

Did you hear me once say CO2 is poison or pollution?