LOL, who are these morons?I just got back from my caucus in Madison County. Total was Paul 20 and Romney 3. The Romney people all said they liked paul but liked Romney better because he is a washington outsider and would bring around "Change", what ever that means. I offically nominate "Change" as the most overused work of this election year.
I'm trying to understand this... how in the hell is it a last place? Someone who isn't a total moron willing to explain this to me?
Get some Ron Paul Republicans in Montana to run for Congress.
If your only goal is Paul's nomination, then yeah, we got practically nothing out of it.I'm not saying that. I'm saything that results-wise, we didn't get anything out of it. From me you'll get the truth, not just compliments all the time. I'm sorry. I appreciate everyone's hard work--I worked hard too.
If you wouldn't mind, please put the details in my thread (which I suppose is being ignored because it's productive): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=113352Great job guys!! It's fodder for us, whether we get delegates or not.
Besides, with a "shoe-in" win, maybe Romney will ease up, and we can elect the majority of our own delegates to the nationals from Montana. They're released from Romney after some number of rounds...
If your only goal is Paul's nomination, then yeah, we got practically nothing out of it.
But for spreading the message, we know that Montana is receptive and a good place to start a take over of Congress. This should be the ultimate goal, as we can't expect to always get a Ron Paul in the White House. We need a Congress that will restrain and fight against future authoritarians. And if these were votes by the state's GOP establishment, our chances are even better.
Ah, thank you.It was winner takes all. So what people are saying, to the ones who worked their asses off to get second place is "YOU DONT MATTER."