2024 New Hampshire primary results **official** thread

[Swordsmyth]

I wouldn't want him back either, in a perfect world. I'd rather have Rand, or even Ron (in this perfect world, Ron would have all the wisdom he now possesses at his ripe old age but would magically be 40 years younger).

But to make the argument as if Nikki somehow has a better chance to beat Biden, and that all is lost somehow because today favored Trump instead, is just absurd. If you really want to be upset with someone, be upset with Nikki, because if not for her campaign existing, your boy DeSantis might have stood somewhat of a chance. (and he could have actually won in the general election, unlike her)



That goes for you, too. "Trump will destroy the GOP."

And what, Bush 3.0 won't? Nikki's entire purpose here is to stop Trump. She doesn't give a sh*t about winning the general. And she wouldn't.

'Trump will destroy it.' Not the establishment people who have been around since the Rockefeller republicans stayed home to spite the Goldwater republicans. Trump. The guy who showed up on the political stage in 2016, and may be gone as early as 2024.

DeepStatus would have thrown the race like Romney and McCain.
But even if he didn't he could not have won, and certainly could not overcome the cheating.
Trump will win.

 

[Swordsmyth]

https://twitter.com/AFpost/status/1750019780525142516

He also beat Bernie's record in NH to hold the all time high.

 

[69360]

LOL

Trump's victory in Iowa was the biggest blowout in Iowa history.

In NH 70% of Haley's voters were Dems and stealth Dems. (Independents)
Trump got 70% of the R votes in a state that was never his best state and that is well known for moderate Republicans.
He got the most votes ever in a NH primary for either party.
And he is the first nonincumbent Republican in history to win both Iowa and NH, and the first Republican to do so since the incumbent in 1976.

He's going to purely destroy Haley by ever greater margins and then beat Biden so badly that they won't be able to cheat enough this time.

Trump had the lowest percentage of any former or incumbent president in the Iowa caucus ever.

 

[Occam's Banana]

 

[acptulsa]

Trump had the lowest percentage of any former or incumbent president in the Iowa caucus ever.

Nope.

The only one he beat was Gerald R. Ford, who was an incumbent because he had been installed to pardon Nixon, and was running against some California ex-Demoncrat named Reagan.

 

[nobody's_hero]

Trump will win.

I'm not so confident. If Trump loses though, it will be due to shenanigans.

Nikki, OTOH, is done. She's openly courting the left to help her in the primaries. Surely, she is not delusional enough to think those folks will stick around to help her in the general.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Trump had the lowest percentage of any former or incumbent president in the Iowa caucus ever.

Nope.

The only one he beat was Gerald R. Ford, who was an incumbent because he had been installed to pardon Nixon, and was running against some California ex-Demoncrat named Reagan.

Trump Shatters Record for Biggest Win in History of Iowa Republican Caucuses

https://www.breitbart.com/2024-elec...record-biggest-win-history-iowa-gop-caucuses/

NICK GILBERTSON 15 Jan 2024

Former President Donald Trump now owns the record for the largest margin of victory in the history of contested Iowa Republican caucuses, more than doubling the previous mark.

Citing the Trump campaign, Reuters reported Friday that late Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole (R-KS) previously held the record in contested Republican Iowa caucuses at 12.8 percent.

As of 11:35 p.m. ET, the New York Times reported Trump had garnered 51 percent of the vote, with 95 percent reporting. He sat 29.7 points ahead of Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) at 21.3 percent as of this writing. The mammoth margin, which will change slightly one way or another as the last five percent of the vote is tabulated, shatters Dole’s record by roughly 17 points as things currently stand.

What is more, Trump appears to have garnered the highest vote share in Iowa Republican caucus history. Former President George Bush had performed the best of any Republican candidate going back to 1972 with 41 percent, data from the Des Moines Public Library shows.

Below is a breakdown of the top two performing Republicans in every Iowa caucus going back to Dole’s record-setting year in 1988, according to the library.

2016: Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) Cruz Beats Trump by 3.3 Percent

Cruz: 27.6 percent
Trump 24.3 percent
2012: Former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) and former Gov. Mitt Romney (R-MA) Tie

Santorum: 24.6 percent
Romney: 24.6 percent
2008: Former Gov. Mike Huckabee (R-AR) Beats Romney by 9.2 Percent

Huckabee: 34.4 percent
Romney: 25.2 percent
2000: Former President George Bush Beats Forbes Editor-in-Chief Steve Forbes by 9 Percent

Bush: 41 percent
Forbes 30 percent
1996: Dole Beats Presidential Consultant Pat Buchanan by 3 Percent

Dole: 26 percent
Buchanan: 23 percent
1988: Dole Beats Televangelist Pat Robertson by 12.8 percent, as Reuters noted.

Dole took roughly 37 percent of the vote that year.
Trump’s win was so decisive on Monday that the Associated Press, CNN, and other major outlets called the race only 30 minutes after the caucuses began as results were just beginning to trickle in. In fact, less than one percent of the vote had been tabulated.

 

[Swordsmyth]

The people.

 

[nobody's_hero]

"But, but, but . . . he's gonna destroy the party! His support can't grow! His indictments are going to scare voters away! Blah blah blah blah."

EDIT: ". . . blah"

 

[acptulsa]

... contested Iowa Republican caucuses, ...

Why did you quote me? I was only talking about current and former presidents.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Why did you quote me? I was only talking about current and former presidents.

Irrelevant.
It was a contested caucus.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Why did you quote me? I was only talking about current and former presidents.

The numbers in the article are all time records for any contested Iowa Caucus, regardless of Presidential status.

 

[acptulsa]

Irrelevant.
It was a contested primary.

So?

You're trying to refute me and IM at the same time even though I refuted IM. You do realize that won't work, right?

Right?

And you're doing it by trying to change the subject of the conversation to something IM did not say. You do know you can't refute something that way, right?

Right?

Why do you tag me when you make an ass of yourself? Haven't you learned that's just a way to guarantee everyone notices yet?

 

[Swordsmyth]

So?

You're trying to refute me and IM at the same time even though I refuted IM. You do realize that won't work, right?

Right?

And you're doing it by trying to change the subject of the conversation to something IM did not say. You do know you can't refute something that way, right?

Right?

Why do you tag me when you make an ass of yourself? Haven't you learned that's just a way to guarantee everyone notices yet?

You claimed he only beat Ford.
He beat everyone and now holds the all time record.

 

[acptulsa]

You claimed he only beat Ford.
He beat everyone and now holds the all time record.

The numbers in the article are all time records for any contested Iowa Caucus, regardless of Presidential status.

I claimed what IM said wasn't accurate, and pointed to the one example I found that disproved what he specifically said.

And you didn't care that this wasn't what we were talking about, because the megalomanic wanted to change the subject and pretend he didn't.

What part of me saying something wasn't accurate, that you wanted to say wasn't accurate, are you whining and bitching about? Did I not kiss orange ass enough to suit you?

Poor Swordy. Two people who are on his enemy list are having a conversation that's over his head, and he wants to disagree with both, but he can't because they're not marching in lockstep with each other. In fact, they disagree. How inconvenient.

Might have to think.

 

[nobody's_hero]

Still have 7% of expected votes remaining with an estimated 24,000 votes remaining to be counted. Haley needs about 33,000 votes to close the gap with Trump.

It's only a day after the primary, so if you're a democrat and still haven't voted for Haley yet, maybe you can still stop Trump.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-primary-elections/new-hampshire-president-results

 

[Snowball]

Registered as Undeclared/Independent (46%)
Registered as a Republican (50%)
Not registered (4%)
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-primary-elections/new-hampshire-president-results

 

[Invisible Man]

It was a contested caucus.

That's the point.

 

[Anti Federalist]

And there was a shitload of them.

You can spot an "Operation Chaos" Marxist crossover voter a mile away. In my small town, you check in with the register and then you are given a red or blue slip to exchange for a GOP or Marxist primary ballot at a table behind them.

Red slips in the hand of an obvious lefty indicates one of these people.

They stick out like a turd in a punch bowl.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1749964661640790246

https://twitter.com/i/status/1749957727588069716

 

[A Son of Liberty]

https://twitter.com/i/status/1749957727588069716

This dude is either completely oblivious, or fully aware and 100% on board with the warfare state. In either case, theoretically, his voting rights really should be revoked.

There is no place for politicians like Haley and Biden, nor their voters, in the American republic.

But, in the end, I guess that's kind of the point... the republic is dead. The Empire - the world's first near total global empire - will do as it pleases, and it will do so with the fawning adoration of dullards like this. And if they find that they do not have enough of them to support their illusionary "democratic" legitimacy, they will just hijack it, and proclaim it to be so. And you people who deny it will be rounded up and sent to Alaska, never to be heard from again.

Prepare for the reality that is coming.