2020: Hillary Clinton Is Running Again
- Thread starter enhanced_deficit
- Start date
Schifference
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2010
- Messages
- 7,423
She is seeking the nomination to rule hell. Some say she is very qualified.
KrokHead
Member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2012
- Messages
- 915
You win at the internet today sir!
Athan
Member
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2008
- Messages
- 3,784
Indeed. If internets are to be believed (lol that is a joke the answer is always no) then this summer will be pretty hot regarding that.
anaconda
Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2007
- Messages
- 19,403
That's a different electoral system down there. Takes 666 to put a candidate over the top. She would be a strong candidate as she has served with distinction as their ambassador to the Planet Earth.
anaconda
Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2007
- Messages
- 19,403
Hee hee! Plus not to mention all of the women who might have remained employed from the Soetoro administration.
Last edited:
John F Kennedy III
Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2011
- Messages
- 13,839
That and we don't have to worry, no goddamn way Hillary lives to 2020.
anaconda
Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2007
- Messages
- 19,403
Might be good for her if she went full grass-fed Paleo, did about 10 hours of brisk treadmill every week, employed a personal trainer, and knocked off any possible alcohol & drugs. She could "reinvent" herself like Madonna. She could switch to the Libertarian Party.
J
Jan2017
Guest
Hmmm . . . maybe running to be the new kingpin for her cellblock
enhanced_deficit
Member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2013
- Messages
- 28,575
This.
With E. Warren as backup in case Hillary somehow fails to run again.
My fault for not adding warning that this was speculation circulated in parts of MSM.
But would not be surprised if Hillary's ambition awaken once again to take another shot at "breaking the glass ceiling".
Would not be surprised if Trump peoples were trying to get "the most qualified Presidential candidate ever" to run again in 2020.
Last edited:
shakey1
Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2017
- Messages
- 4,823
Last edited:
Pauls' Revere
Member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2007
- Messages
- 11,347
I can't take another 2016 election cycle in 2020.
https://nypost.com/2018/10/20/count-on-hillary-clinton-running-again-in-2020/
Alas, the motives are suspect. These three writers, all female, are not so much angry at what Clinton is saying as they are over the timing. The gist of their complaint is that she is hogging the spotlight they believe should be trained on Democrats running in the midterms. They’re mad because they fear she’s undercutting the holy war they subscribe to against President Trump.
Intramural feuds are often bloody, but this one is also stupid. Trying to silence Clinton is a lost cause and, even if it succeeded, wouldn’t cure what ails Democrats.
In fact, shutting her up might push the party even deeper into the wilderness.
Implicit in the charge that Clinton is the problem is the assumption that others are the solution. It’s a fair point — until you try to name any Dem who has a better shot at serving as the party’s leader, uniting it around a message and potentially defeating Trump in 2020. After all, that’s the job that is vacant.
So let us run through the parade of likely applicants, starting in the Senate: Bernie Sanders, Cory Booker, Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren, Amy Klobuchar and Kirsten Gillibrand.
Anybody stand out? While there is political talent, none strikes me as a heavyweight contender who could lead the party and go toe-to-toe with Trump.
Sanders is running on vapors, Booker is a lightweight who embarrassed himself with the Spartacus shtick and Gillibrand is a *do-nothing hack.
As for Warren, CNN, showing its usual tin ear, moved her to the top of the Dem field just before she imploded with her disastrous DNA test. Her silly repetition of the now-disproven claim that she has significant Native American ancestry opens her to endless ridicule and further diminishes her *already narrow appeal.
Others advertising their availability include Joe Biden, Eric Holder, Montana Gov. Steve Bullock, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti and former Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick.
Same question: Does anybody in the group look like a champion in waiting? Not to me and, to judge from the lack of great enthusiasm, not to big funders or hot-shot consultants.
Two others in the thinking-and-hoping stage are New York’s feuding Frick and Frack, Mayor de Blasio and Gov. Cuomo.
Mayor Putz is term-limited and it looks as if his career has peaked. His image of being lazy, corrupt and incompetent means he’s not an asset to anyone, so he may have to get a real job when he finally leaves City Hall.
As for Cuomo, his mediocre rec*ord might get him a third term in deep-blue New York, but it’s not likely to endear him to national Dems. He trusts no one, including himself, which is why he hides from the media, lest he say things like America “was never that great.”
His habit of ducking debates won’t fly in a grueling presidential campaign against numerous competitors, and the rampant corruption on his watch makes him a fat target.
Billionaire Michael Bloomberg is also considering a run, and fellow richie Tom Steyer, whose deep pockets are funding the “Need to Impeach” movement, could be a candidate. Oprah flirted with the idea before saying no, but don’t be surprised if she flirts again.
The list, then, is long, varied and growing — but not compelling. Which is why Clinton, despite her enormous flaws and two presidential defeats, can’t be ruled out as the party’s best hope. God knows she wants it more than anybody else.
It’s also why I have been saying for months that she was keeping her options open and might actually seek a rematch with Trump.
And that was before she and Bill Clinton announced their six-month speaking tour. The gambit is designed to keep her name front and center without having to declare herself a candidate. Her recent phone calls to White House reporters also signal her plan.
So I was not surprised when one of her former aides, Philippe Reines, admitted to Politico that Clinton might run. He cited her fan base, said she was tough enough to go against Trump and could raise the money.
There you have it, the official word that attempts to silence her are doomed. Brace yourself — she’s baaaack!
[sic]
https://nypost.com/2018/10/20/count-on-hillary-clinton-running-again-in-2020/
Alas, the motives are suspect. These three writers, all female, are not so much angry at what Clinton is saying as they are over the timing. The gist of their complaint is that she is hogging the spotlight they believe should be trained on Democrats running in the midterms. They’re mad because they fear she’s undercutting the holy war they subscribe to against President Trump.
Intramural feuds are often bloody, but this one is also stupid. Trying to silence Clinton is a lost cause and, even if it succeeded, wouldn’t cure what ails Democrats.
In fact, shutting her up might push the party even deeper into the wilderness.
Implicit in the charge that Clinton is the problem is the assumption that others are the solution. It’s a fair point — until you try to name any Dem who has a better shot at serving as the party’s leader, uniting it around a message and potentially defeating Trump in 2020. After all, that’s the job that is vacant.
So let us run through the parade of likely applicants, starting in the Senate: Bernie Sanders, Cory Booker, Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren, Amy Klobuchar and Kirsten Gillibrand.
Anybody stand out? While there is political talent, none strikes me as a heavyweight contender who could lead the party and go toe-to-toe with Trump.
Sanders is running on vapors, Booker is a lightweight who embarrassed himself with the Spartacus shtick and Gillibrand is a *do-nothing hack.
As for Warren, CNN, showing its usual tin ear, moved her to the top of the Dem field just before she imploded with her disastrous DNA test. Her silly repetition of the now-disproven claim that she has significant Native American ancestry opens her to endless ridicule and further diminishes her *already narrow appeal.
Others advertising their availability include Joe Biden, Eric Holder, Montana Gov. Steve Bullock, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti and former Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick.
Same question: Does anybody in the group look like a champion in waiting? Not to me and, to judge from the lack of great enthusiasm, not to big funders or hot-shot consultants.
Two others in the thinking-and-hoping stage are New York’s feuding Frick and Frack, Mayor de Blasio and Gov. Cuomo.
Mayor Putz is term-limited and it looks as if his career has peaked. His image of being lazy, corrupt and incompetent means he’s not an asset to anyone, so he may have to get a real job when he finally leaves City Hall.
As for Cuomo, his mediocre rec*ord might get him a third term in deep-blue New York, but it’s not likely to endear him to national Dems. He trusts no one, including himself, which is why he hides from the media, lest he say things like America “was never that great.”
His habit of ducking debates won’t fly in a grueling presidential campaign against numerous competitors, and the rampant corruption on his watch makes him a fat target.
Billionaire Michael Bloomberg is also considering a run, and fellow richie Tom Steyer, whose deep pockets are funding the “Need to Impeach” movement, could be a candidate. Oprah flirted with the idea before saying no, but don’t be surprised if she flirts again.
The list, then, is long, varied and growing — but not compelling. Which is why Clinton, despite her enormous flaws and two presidential defeats, can’t be ruled out as the party’s best hope. God knows she wants it more than anybody else.
It’s also why I have been saying for months that she was keeping her options open and might actually seek a rematch with Trump.
And that was before she and Bill Clinton announced their six-month speaking tour. The gambit is designed to keep her name front and center without having to declare herself a candidate. Her recent phone calls to White House reporters also signal her plan.
So I was not surprised when one of her former aides, Philippe Reines, admitted to Politico that Clinton might run. He cited her fan base, said she was tough enough to go against Trump and could raise the money.
There you have it, the official word that attempts to silence her are doomed. Brace yourself — she’s baaaack!
[sic]
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 117,537
Oh, they'll find a way...
That is truly hideous.
Pauls' Revere
Member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2007
- Messages
- 11,347
and to think, some guy stuck his Johnson in that.
dannno
Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2007
- Messages
- 65,717
Not proven.
Pauls' Revere
Member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2007
- Messages
- 11,347
LOL a donation.
Similar threads
