19% support for Ron Paul?

It'd be interesting to see where Ron Paul would be if he had fair coverage. While Paul might have high unapproval ratings (around 55% at least nationwide) thats among people who know him. Overall around 70% of the country still has no idea who Paul is or what he stands for.

I thought when the race condensed to just six major candidates that he would start getting more balanced coverage, but alas not the case.

I'm assuming we will only have 5 candidates at most when Super Tuesday rolls around (Thompson dropping out) and wouldn't be suprised still to see a media blackout of Paul.
 
I'm assuming we will only have 5 candidates at most when Super Tuesday rolls around (Thompson dropping out) and wouldn't be suprised still to see a media blackout of Paul.

Call me cynical, but I think the field will stay as large as possible as long as possible until they successfully keep RP out of picture long enough to guarantee he can't get the nomination.

Of course, that could also backfire if the delegate distribution gets too thin and we get a brokered convention.
 
Looks like MSNBC is in on the Michigan blackout as well. They just put up a picture of the candidates names with their percentage amounts in the polls. They left Paul completey out of it.:(
 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact:
Steve Mitchell
248-891-2414
Paul Welday
248-320-0035
Date: Sunday, January 13, 2008

Romney Takes 2% Lead Over McCain
Huckabee Distant Third

Romney 29%, McCain 27%, Huckabee 12%

LANSING, Mich. — Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney has taken a 2% lead over U.S. Sen. John McCain according to results of a tracking poll conducted Thursday, Saturday and Sunday. Romney leads with 29% to McCain’s 27% with Mike Huckabee at 12%. Rudy Giuliani and Ron Paul are getting 7%, Fred Thompson 4%, and Duncan Hunter 2%, among likely voters in the Michigan Republican Presidential Primary Election. Six percent say they will vote “uncommitted” while 5% are undecided.

The telephone tracking poll is being conducted by Mitchell Interactive. Mitchell Interactive is an East Lansing, Michigan and Washington, DC based national political polling and market research company. The survey of 582 likely Republican Presidential Primary voters was conducted January 10, 12 and 13, 2008. The survey has a margin of error of +-4.1% at the 95% level of confidence.

“As the undecided voters make up their minds, more are turning to Mitt Romney than to John McCain. We have also seen the participation among Republicans increase from 62% last night to 75% at the end of phoning tonight. That means that 75% of the voters taking part in the GOP Primary identify themselves as Republicans,” Steve Mitchell, president of Mitchell Interactive said.

Page 2 of 2 Mitchell Interactive Poll Results Republican Primary Voters 1/13/2008

“Voters since the New Hampshire Primary have all talked about change. However, when asked which is more important to voters in their presidential choice, ‘experience’ or ‘being an agent of change,’ almost seven in ten (69%) say experience while 20% say being an agent of change. Romney leads by 2% with those saying experience and he leads by more than 2:1 among those who say being an agent of change is most important in their presidential choice,” Mitchell concluded. .

The final night of tracking will be tomorrow night with results released before 10:00 PM.

Steve Mitchell has been the most accurate pollster in Michigan in the last four presidential campaigns.* Polling for the Detroit News in the 2000 MI GOP Primary, his final polling correctly had John McCain winning over George W. Bush.* Polling again for the Detroit News in the 2004 MI Dem Primary, his final polling correctly showed the top 
four candidates in the order they finished and had John Kerry at 52%, his final margin.

In the 2000 General Election, his final poll had Gore leading by 5% in Michigan, he won by 5%.* In the 2004 General Election, his final polling had Kerry leading by 2% in Michigan, he won by 3%.* In his final national poll for WDIV-TV in Detroit, he had Bush winning by 4%, he won by 3%.*

-30-

http://www.mitchellinteractive.com/pr.html
 
Half the problem with the blackout or lack of coverage is the fault of HQ.

I'm beginning to think the same thing. With the money we donated they could be running TV ads in every state in the country. what do they do - Rent a blimp?

RPs communication officer said they have zero interest in an independent run for the presidency as they two party system is the only chance anyone has. The Republican party has sh*t on Dr. Paul. He is wasting time in the Republican primaries. Enough money has been donated to launch an independent run. Once again RP's communication officer says only people like Bloomberg and Ross Perot can finance an independent run. How about the record number of dollars we have been donating. So the only people who can finance a presidential run are the vastly wealthy. shucks - I guess our money isn't good enough.
 
Well back that up then.

I keep hearing people saying HQ sucks but why?

BECAUSE...

They are in charge of the campaign that has the following:

1. A very likeable candidate with a winning message

2. A large enthusiastic & committed grassroots base

3. $28 million in funds raised

We are losing across the country to campaigns with poor/losing messages, small lackluster grassroots supporters and less funds raised.

And you ask why we say that HQs sucks?

(BTW - I concede we are put at a big disadvantage due to media & establishment bias)
 
The campaign has had some problems, but the biggest problem is not organizing. There needs to be organization going on right now basically in all the Super Tuesday states and all the other states before it. This isn't being done.

However, right now our greatest hope is for Romney to win Michigan and Paul to get third there. That way it makes McCain look like less of a presumptive front runner and shows us on the rise.

People have to realize things didn't end with New Hampshire. If McCain wins Michigan it may very well appear like they did.

However, we can not blame the campaign alone for one Romney, McCain, Giuliani, and Thompson all had huge coverage or lots of money all along. It was only in the Third and Fourth Quarter that we started outraising them. There is also media bias, which has become almost openly expressed.
 
How about the fact that we gave them $20million+ and they've apparently wasted it and/or not spent it?

Of course they haven't spent it. There are 20 some States coming up on Super Tuesday. Did you want them to spend all of it and then run out of money?
 
Back
Top