14-State Governors served with Warnings of Arrest

If you have an alternate link, the producers at my station are interested in the story, and want to check its credibility before putting anything on air. If there is any truth to this, Im gonna get this broadcast...

This story has the stink all about it. First of all, if these letters are so tippy top secret, how does the author know about them? Did all the governors go public?

I smell a heinous anus. "I don't like this Anus. I think its dirty."
 
interesting....

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/23628

From the article:

Barack Hussein Obama had served 14-State Governors in the United States, N

Unfortunately you didn't post the Author, and the date.
**************************
I first saw this story here:

http://www.congress.org/congressorg/bio/userletter/?letter_id=5264198406&content_dir=congressorg

Representative Bobby Scott (D-VA 3rd)
9th-term Democrat from Virginia.
Photo: Representative Scott
Bio & Contact Info
Send Message
Key Votes
Member Staff
Letters To Leaders
· More Letters to
Rep. Scott

· Search All
Letters


Letters To Leaders
All messages are published with permission of the sender. The general topic of this message is Consumer Affairs:
Subject:
Obama Threatens 14 US Governors With Immediate Arrest for the crime of treason.

To:
President Barack Obama
Rep. Bobby Scott
Sen. Jim Webb
Sen. Mark Warner

May 27, 2010

Obama Threatens 14 US Governors With Immediate Arrest
Posted by Europe
***********************
Notice the date. May 27
**********************

I then did some more research. I came up with this:

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1375.htm
**************************


May 26, 2010

Obama Threatens 14 US Governors With Immediate Arrest

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

A chilling report from the Foreign Military Intelligence Directorate (GRU)
*****************************

Notice the date. May 26, 2010
**************************

Who is Sorcha Faal? Let's Google. Here's one:
***********************
SORRY - SKEPTICAL OF ANYTHING FROM DAVID BOOTH

Posted By: SCRIBE
Date: Monday, 14-Sep-2009 14:47:52

In Response To: Russian Military Base Holding “True Files” On 9/11 Brutally Attacked (Rayelan)

As it is well known that the "Sorcha Faal" site is owned and operated by David Booth, I put about 0% faith in anything the site posts.

It does make for some creative reading though!

Just Google "Sorcha Faal - David Booth".

an example: http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a1874.htm - "Note:. There is no such person as “Sorcha Faal, Russian academic” “Sorcha Faal” is actually David Booth, an American computer programmer “Sorcha” is alleged to be a Russian academic but there is absolutely no record of anyone with such a name in Russian academia. These periodic eruptions have absolutely no basis in any kind of fact or reality and are typical of the nonsense bespangling the internet. These reports, however, have a good deal of entertainment value. This idiocy is almost as funny as the Scientology cult babblings. Ed."

Google Books - "Picking Up the Pieces: Practical Guide for Surviving Economic Crashes ... By Sorcha Faal, David Booth

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?noframes;read=155704

***********************
 
yea, it doesn't seem like there is a lot of evidence showing this is true. however, imagine if 14 governors were arrested at the same time! shi would hit the fan
 
Alright, there we go... honestly, it doesn't seem too ridiculous. The link comes up blank, though...
 
The letter had to be deleted. I used to use congress.org all the time. and you cannot submit 1 liners or blank pages with just a headline.
 
This is a joke, because the author of the news item clearly has no coherent understanding of the structure of the federal armed forces or the Militia Clauses [Article I, Sec. 8] of the Constitution.

1. The National Guard is a federal entity.

The National Guard as we presently know it are not the state militias most assume them to be. Instead, they are federal reserve troops who are, for all intents and purposes, on loan to the states. This is why they take TWO oaths of enlistment when they sign-up. The first puts them in the federal armed forces, and the second is a pro forma act of commitment to their own state.

Go read the Subtitle E of Title 10 of the U.S. Code...

2. The states are constitutionally guaranteed militias under both the Militia Clauses and the Second Amendment. If Obama tells them they can't have one, those governors can tell Obama to go "procreate" with himself.

3. However, even if these governors do set up these forces, the will still be able to call-up by Congress in order to "execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions".

There was argument before the Iraq War that the use of NG units overseas was prohibited since it didn't fulfill any of these three criteria. But such arguments were irrelevant since all members of the NG are concurrently reserve members of their respective branch, and can be activated at the discretion of Congress and the President.

If these state defense forces did exist, then the argument about limiting federal service to only those three conditions enumerated in the Militia Clauses would have any weight.


Finally, Obama wouldn't use an NSL to do this [assuming this story were true]. NSLs came out of the Patriot Act and concern sneak and peak warrants. They are irrelevant to command and control of military units.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top