10th DWI=Life

tod evans

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
36,071
From Drudge;


Weatherford Man Sentenced to Life in Prison for 10th DWI

http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/We...to-Life-in-Prison-for-10th-DWI-366068451.html

District Judge Craig Towson told Ivy Ray Eberhardt he was "a second away from hurting someone really badly" as he announced the sentence, according to a news release issued by Parker County district attorneys.

"Part of my job is to protect the citizens of Parker County," Towson told Eberhardt. "The only way that I can think of to do that from somebody that has 12 DWI arrests and 10 DWI convictions is to put you in a place that you can’t drive for as long as I possibly can."
On April 13, 2014, Weatherford police said they responded a call about a reckless driver on U.S. 180 and saw Eberhardt swerving and driving in the wrong lane. When police pulled Eberhardt over, they said he told the officer he had consumed most of a 750-ml bottle of whiskey that was found in his vehicle.

Assistant District Attorney Jeff Swain said Eberhardt's case is only now concluded because they had to wait for him to finish his sentence for a similar case in Colorado.
"Eberhardt cut off his electronic monitor, skipped bond and fled to Colorado where he was arrested for yet another DWI offense," Swain said.

Court records indicated that Eberhardt was convicted of four DWI offenses in Travis and Tarrant counties in the 1980s and 1990s. He also spent time in prison for DWI offenses in Parker, Tarrant and Runnels counties. He was also convicted of DWI offenses in Colorado in 2010 and 2015.
Swain said Eberhardt will be eligible for parole after 15 years of his sentence, but he can receive good conduct credit toward reaching that number.

In a statement released Thursday, Jason Derscheid, North Texas executive director of Mothers Against Drunk Driving, said:
"In 2014, more than 1,400 people were killed in drunk driving crashes in the state of Texas. It only takes drinking and driving one time to kill yourself, or kill someone else. Convicted drunk driving offenders must be held accountable after the first offense. One DUI conviction is absolutely unacceptable, ten convicted DUIs is egregious."
 
We cannot afford to feed this bum, air drop him into the middle of Alaska and let mother nature take over.
 
Wouldn't it be cheaper just to give him taxi vouchers?
 
it would cost less for the government to hire a 24/7 personal driver for him
 
Has he ever harmed anyone or damaged anyone's property? I'm guessing not because they didn't mention it. Complete miscarriage of justice.
 
143232-144579.jpg
 
Moral of the story: Don't drink and drive kids!

Self driving cars cannot come soon enough for some people.
 
Moral of the story: Don't drink and drive kids!

Self driving cars cannot come soon enough for some people.

Yes, it's a great lesson. Even if you never hurt anybody you can go to jail for life. Do NOT mess with the government keep me safe crowd.
 
I'm thinking it was more than just the DWI's that led to the sentence.

The guy cut off his ankle bracelet and skipped bond. It's not like the justice system didn't try to give him as many alternatives as possible. The video even mentions rehab at one point.

Other than letting him go and sending a message that it's okay to get smashed and drive on the opposite side of the highway, what do you do with a guy like this?
 
I'm thinking it was more than just the DWI's that led to the sentence.

The guy cut off his ankle bracelet and skipped bond. It's not like the justice system didn't try to give him as many alternatives as possible. The video even mentions rehab at one point.

Other than letting him go and sending a message that it's okay to get smashed and drive on the opposite side of the highway, what do you do with a guy like this?

The answer is the same for all cases of living "impaired" nothing.

Nothing needs to be done until there's actual damage done, then that specific crime must be addressed and possibly the sentence enhanced due to impairment.

"Impairment"can be any number of things that would effect concentration from being lovelorn to high or drunk, even operating a vehicle with an infant in the car could rightly be considered an impairment.

This idea that consuming booze or dope is a greater evil than consuming pharmaceutical drugs or living with a crazy person is absolute insanity that's being taught from grade school on...
 
I agree the gentleman is probably a waste of good air, but that doesn't mean he should waste it on our nickel.
 
The answer is the same for all cases of living "impaired" nothing.

I wish to be protected from this man and anyone like him as a direct threat to my life and liberty. It is possible to prevent death and injuries due to their actions. We used to be able to ship guys like this to Australia....

An alternative to taking away this mans life via prison, I'm thinking implanting a device that closes the esophagus when it detects alcohol.
 
I wish to be protected from this man and anyone like him as a direct threat to my life and liberty. It is possible to prevent death and injuries due to their actions.

Then you do not understand what LIBERTY is.

We used to be able to ship guys like this to Australia....

When "we" were SUBJECTS to a king.

An alternative to taking away this mans life via prison, I'm thinking implanting a device that closes the esophagus when it detects alcohol.

The alternative is TOLERANCE and COMPASSION, be a public SERVANT and offer the man with mental issues a ride home. ...or go on with your day because if there is NO THEFT and NO VIOLENCE then its NON OF YOUR BUSINESS.
 
10 chances seem like an awful lot. Is he the judge's or police chief's brother in law? Keep him off the streets before he kills some innocent folks.
 
The alternative is TOLERANCE and COMPASSION, be a public SERVANT and offer the man with mental issues a ride home. ...or go on with your day because if there is NO THEFT and NO VIOLENCE then its NON OF YOUR BUSINESS.

That sounds like a nice utopia. A problem being no-one else is ever held accountable when people get killed by drunk drivers.

I understand the principles of liberty my friend. I have the right to protect myself and ask others to help protect me. I believe driving impaired is an act of aggression against people. The question is how to apply sufficient justifiable defense. I've already indicated I disagree with taking this mans life and liberty via prison. However your alternative is its own fallacy.
 
Back
Top