1000s of Apologys for Glenn Beck

I sent him a thank you email!

Mr. Beck:

I watched your show for the first time (how did you know there would be so many of us!). I must thank you for giving a full hour to Ron Paul. He truly deserves such openness to explain many views which to many, might seem "radical" at first.

But you know as well as I do, its all about freedom! And its how our country began, and its how it was intended.

I disagree with your decision to bring up the comments from a small group of Dr. Paul's supporters. However, it needed to be said, and I hope those responsible for their inappropriate actions realize the consequences.

Overall, good interview, and your ideologies for the most part seem to be pretty forward.

Thanks again.


Patrick A. Krott
Fairview, PA
 
Glen Beck is a hot headed idiot and we should not apologize to him.

We don't have to apologize. But we should at least give him thanks for allowing paul on prime time televesion for an entire hour ! what other media reporter would do that ?
 
B.S.

No one should apologize for anyone else who may or may not have been RP supporters.

Glen Beck called us traitors and in bed with islamofascists and suggested the military needs to protect America from YOU AND ME.

I will not apologize to Glen Beck for what anyone else has done.

+1
 
To anyone taking this thread seriously.

Apologizing for someone else's actions contradicts every aspect of personal responsibility, something I'm sure RP supports
 
Email Beck now and apologize for the Truthers or fanatics that were sending him threats. Overall, a very good interview.

Wait a second. I don't agree with the 911 Truthers either, but that has nothing whatsoever to do with the threat that Beck said he received. These are two very separate issues. Please do not combine them.

Nor, am I insulting the Truthers. I am very glad they support Dr. Paul, just like the rest of us. We ALL want freedom.
 
Last edited:
And please be sure to mention that just because someone claims to support Ron Paul does not mean that they really do. Those who oppose us are certainly underhanded enough to make threats and attach Ron Paul's name to it. They have a purpose and that purpose is to portray supporters as psychos especially in the minds of the talking heads.
 
That's right. He offered no proof whatsoever.

Also, I doubt any REAL Ron Paul supporter would threaten anyone.

Don't forget the word "Real" here. There's no such thing as one group people being all good; especially not when talking about something as massive as the Ron Paul Movement.

This is the Ron Paul Re-love-ution and all Glenn Beck needs is a bit of extra love. If he gets 1000 of thank-mails, he'll be endorsing Ron Paul before you know it :D
 
Don't forget the word "Real" here. There's no such thing as one group people being all good; especially not when talking about something as massive as the Ron Paul Movement.

This is the Ron Paul Re-love-ution and all Glenn Beck needs is a bit of extra love. If he gets 1000 of thank-mails, he'll be endorsing Ron Paul before you know it :D

Exactly. Beck is disgusted with all the Republicans right now, and extending an olive branch to Beck could work very well in our favor leading up to Iowa and New Hampshire.
 
That's right. He offered no proof whatsoever.

Also, I doubt any Ron Paul supporter would threaten anyone.

Get real. I don't doubt it for a second. Every campaign has a few nutcases. As far as "proof" is concerned, do you honestly think Dr. Paul would have entertained these questions if Beck had not shown him part of the video? Oh, c'mon! :rolleyes:
 
Wow. So many people on this thread put the "love" in Revolution. So many people here prove that the stereotype of RP supporters being irrationally belligerent at all turns to rest. It warms my heart and would surely make Ron Paul proud.
 
my email to Glen.

I am saddened to hear that you have been threatened by people who purport to be supporters of Ron Paul. As Dr. Paul explained in your interview, the revolution according to him and true supporters of his message is of delivering the message of freedom in a peaceful manner. I can assure you that these people do more harm than good to Dr. Paul and may well be doing so intentionally. Please take the necessary precautions to protect yourself from these people (I suggest exercising your right to carry and use arms if needed).
I am very glad to see that you conducted a fair interview with Dr. Paul. I ardently hope you continue to give his message fair and unbiased coverage in future.

Best,
 
Back
Top