supreme court

  1. Objectivist

    Souter To Retire From SCOTUS.....

    What do you think Obama thinks about Supreme Court Appointees? Here, listen for yourself. YouTube - Obamas on Supreme Court Nominations, President Won Election Does Not Mean He Gets His Judge I wonder how much he'll listen to the Republicans on their views of his chick pick.
  2. lynnf

    Bogus POTUS SCOTUS case: Scalia gives us a hint

    Scalia says you have to have 4 votes - that hints that one of the "conservative" justices is not voting with the other conservatives. thank you Scalia! now we need to find the traitor and expose them. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=91345 .... "Scalia stated that...
  3. D

    SCOTUS takes yet another chunk out of the 4th Amendment

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/sns-ap-scotus-pat-down,0,597117.story So I guess now just being stopped for a broken taillight means you and your passenger are considered armed and dangerous , giving reasonable suspicion for search.
  4. arKangel

    SCOTUS Drops All Obama Cases?

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2169142/posts Dr. Orly Taitz case mysteriously disappears... http://drorly.blogspot.com/2009/01/obama-has-been-in-power-only-one-day.html Google Cache: Original It does now appear to be gone. No explanation, just gone. According to freepers, all...
  5. anaconda

    Should the House impeach SCOTUS justices?

    What if RP introduced articles of impeachment against the SCOTUS judges for throwing out Obama natural born citizen cases, with the assertion that all U.S. citizens have "standing?"
  6. B

    Berg distributed in SCOTUS

    "Dec 23 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2009." http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm
  7. T

    Donofrio case - SCOTUS It's not about the birth certificate

    http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/williams/081205 [...] However, this case is an action against the Secretary of State of New Jersey and as such, has precedent, as Donofrio relates. He originally sought to motivate the Secretary to qualify or disqualify these three candidates on the New Jersey...
  8. P

    Scotus ***important info*********

    sorry guys...i am rushed for time...so this is a copy/paste from another m/u ======================== aloha kath, GLAD to see someone else posting this stuff!!!! i've felt like the lone ranger here sometimes ;( note: anyone following leo's case--he had to move his blog once...
  9. P

    Scotus *** important info*************

    Mods, my humble apologies...you can move this if necessary-- yet if people are not visiting "Obama watch" ...they are missing out on the most important issues right now. ============================== sorry guys...i am rushed for time...so this is a copy/paste from another m/u...
  10. P

    Confirmed by scotus: Donofrio v. Wells was distributed for conference of december 5,

    http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/ CONFIRMED BY SCOTUS: DONOFRIO V. WELLS WAS DISTRIBUTED FOR CONFERENCE OF DECEMBER 5, 2008 BY THE FULL UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Posted in Uncategorized on December 1, 2008 by naturalborncitizen [UPDATE] Leo Donofrio and Cort Wrotnowski will be on...
  11. RSLudlum

    SCOTUS to rule on Fed pre-emption of States

    ....through a FDA regulatory case. :(
  12. Cowlesy

    SCOTUS Interpretation of the object "Arms"

    Scalia cites the 1773 edition of Samuel Johnson's dictionary which defined "arms" as "weapons of offence, or armour of defence". He also cites Timothy Cunningham's 1771 dictionary which defined "arms" as "any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to...
  13. angelatc

    Cool Link: SCOTUS Live Blog

    http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/liveblog-orders-and-opinions-62308/ Next live blog will be Wednesday.
  14. madengr

    SCOTUS DC case and Fincher NFA

    Maybe you guys have heard of Wayne Fincher. http://www.snubnose.info/wordpress/rkba/hollis-wayne-fincher/ In a nutshell, he purposly built machine guns himself, took pictures, and sent it to the ATF. The whole point was to force the issue into court. The feds can only regulate interstate...
  15. Truth Warrior

    How many Federal laws has the SCOTUS ever declared unconstitutional?

    Just curious!
  16. B

    w00t! SCOTUS sides with Washington voters for primary rules!!!

    Story SCOTUS has ruled that two top vote-getter primary may be used in Washington, and this will be used in August primary (I'm not sure what this is for since we already had our primary but whatever). However, they cautioned that the design of ballot will be the real litmus test and thus...
  17. IPSecure

    SCOTUS Says "NO"! What Must A Free People Do? We have NO Redress!!!

    SCOTUS Says "NO"! What Must A Free People Do? We have NO Redress! On February 25, 2008, the Supreme Court of the United States, without comment, voted again not to hear We The People v. United States. Thus, SCOTUS ducked its Constitutional duty, yet again, to declare the meaning of the last...
  18. N

    SCOTUS Says "NO" What Must A Free People Do?

    SCOTUS Says "NO" What Must A Free People Do? This Saturday: Schulz Speaks in Tampa Next: Schulz to Speak in TX, NM, AZ On February 25, 2008, the Supreme Court of the United States, without comment, voted again not to hear We The People v. United States. Thus, SCOTUS ducked its Constitutional...
  19. T

    List of Amacus Briefs sent to SCOTUS supporting the 2nd Amendment

    http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/?s=DC+v.+Heller That link will take you to a list of all the Amacus (friend of the court) briefs supporting the Second Amendment. I've only read three of four of them. The best so far is the one submitted by Gun Owners of America, next is the one (amazingly)...
  20. T

    Administration requests liberal ruling from SCOTUS

    The information below is from the Supreme Court of the United States as posted on their SCOTUSBLOG. It is a very important presentation that should be carefully considered. The Administration is asking rule in a way that will allow current federal law to be retained even if it is technically or...
Back
Top