Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/bush-marco-rubio-ted-cruz-syria-216077#ixzz3s0z2h8vq
They do throw Paul a bone at the end, but even then ....
I think it was all about Constitutionalism and trying to get Congress back into controlling the use of force. As I mentioned, he got an earful in the committee debates about why no Declaration was warranted; I think the experience has probably convinced him that the formalism of DOW won't go...
Nothing that happens anywhere ever is not part of the massive joint effort conspiracy to keep the Pauls out of the White House. My bacon this morning was subpar to make me feel less favorable to a market economy.
When exactly did the United States "declare war" on the Barbary Pirates? You're not suggesting an authorization to use military force is constitutionally equivalent to a Declaration, are you?
But speaking of declaring war on ISIL, Bush came out for that yesterday. Rand Paul should be all over...
This matter has been litigated - many times in fact - and the answer has always been the same. Birthers just refuse to accept it. Vattel's definition has been rejected and the English common law definition of "natural born subject" has been accepted. Here is the best summation...
I can't believe there are folks here that believe Paul's DOW proposal in Nov. 2014 should be trumpeted at this time. It's as if they wear blinders to the world outside of Pauldom. Advancing this as somehow a show of Paul's "aggressive stance" versus ISIL ignores the facts on the ground...
"Official notice of Dispute" was filed with New Hampshire attorney general today contesting eligibility of Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Bobby Jindal, and Rick Santorum.
Here...
BRODY: How is that conversation going with God about this potential presidential run? Has He grabbed you by the collar yet? I read an article about that.
CARSON: I feel fingers. But, um, it’s mostly me. I have to be sure. And I have a surgical personality which says always look before you leap...