Theocrat

My empirical evidence is benevolence to human intelligence it's like my eyes strapped with lazers using Occam's razors to blast through you haters that show signs of being alive but your heads brainless with those scripture pages what I speak is ageless its foundations built upon civilizations you cant stop me im tameless here to wreak havoc on your maverick but its too easy your claims are baseless

You might be interested:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tg3oGTs0dg&playnext_from=TL&videos=nqPHKVL0qoM&feature=sub

you can rhyme with style but jesus still on that x-file and your argument weak exposed like collateral murder on wikileak your facts are fiction stop depictin u causin friction im on a mission to put you out of comission its not ahead of me, here try this beautiful natural remedy

If you want to experience true spirituality, I suggest you partake in nature's remedy, psilocybin mushrooms. These plants have a huge impact on our neurological systems, and we all know, nature doesn't expend energy for no reason, there's a purpose. I think it could bring you even closer to the true wonders of this universe. This is the next step Theo. http://www.erowid.org/plants/mushrooms/mushrooms.shtml

I never really left. I usually only read through the threads that interest me and even though I feel like responding to many of them, I refrain since I am at work and feel obligated to limit my time on the net. I don't have internet at home yet, I just moved to a rural area, I am looking into satellite internet, maybe I will comment more then but then again maybe not, I have a 2 1/2 acre pond stocked with bass, crappie and bluegill and I am too tempted to grab my pole and go fishing when at home and not waste time staring at a computer, I do that all day at work.

Keep up the good work on your posts, this forum could use the amount of unobstructed light that your posts bring to any subject. You’re a man after my own heart and sound so much like my hero Greg Bahnsen. God bless you bro!

Nihilist no more.

Too much conformity to the label was required. I always tried to classify myself as an absurdist, but now I'm just insane -- but I do believe in morality so far as I believe in "style."

At any rate, you're very stylish.

<3

Is there any scheduling or common conditions to when you come into Vent? Checking every couple hours is kind of lame.

I think you would enjoy my recent post regarding de Soto's lengthy paper on the impossibility of the State. It's here http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?p=2388595#post2388595 if you're interested.

Theo, really nice hearing you in vent tonight, I'd like to hear more from you too

Hey I thought someone else should post here for a change.... HOW HAVE YOU BEEN!!?
You should take me to your church sometime, STAY IN TOUCH!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzglDS88u50 Hoppe explains in great detail how a Stateless society would work in this lecture for your viewing pleasure. (more than an hour long)

I told you, I've listened to all the Constitutionalists' arguments. They fail. I didn't say that "just by having free markets and voluntary associations that will change the human heart"-YOU DID. Individuals are responsible for themselves, their families, and their safety. The Sate not only fails in this, it perpetrates crimes against individuals (see the numerous threads on this subject alone). If you had read the literature you were supposed to, you would know that anarchy exists everywhere the State does not, including your own home.

The articles posted are not the sum total of literature on Stateless society. Conza and others have also listed numerous books which you've ignored (I can tell because your arguments are refuted in the literature which you obviously haven't read). History does show examples of successful Stateless societies (Celtic Ireland, etc.), you just ignore it to advance your phony "arguments". Again, read the literature before posting on the subject again (unless you feel like giving me a laugh at your ignorance-which I do appreciate sometimes).

If you had taken the time to read anarchist literature or paid any attention during the debates, you would know that your criticisms are false. Please refrain from your disinformation campaign till you can actually cite anarchist literature and find a flaw in it. (I can cite flaws in the Republic all day long, and I almost did in the threads on a few occasions) All you're doing is basing your conclusions on uninformed assumptions, per usual. Bad form, and very un-Christian of you.

But the rule of law in a Constitutional republic does not constrain the people who most need to be constrained (TPTB), and inevitably fails due to its lack of objective morality (as I've illustrated in the board debates. Also take note of previous fallen corrupt republics, viz. Rome, Greece, Weimar, Russia, etc.). This problem does not occur in stateless societies (see the literature I've previously posted on Stateless society).

http://www.youtube.com/v/KlL5vm9GK3A&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&featur e=player_embedded&fs=1

FYI, At the above link, Peter Schiff discusses how the FedGov doesn't care about what the Constitution says. (He's talking here about how his Dad's futile fight against the unconstitutional income tax) Enjoy! :cool:

I found out something interesting (I'll find verifying documentation ASAP) today. In AZ, a person receiving disability benefits is not even allowed to VOLUNTEER with a Church-or else they will lose all their means of surviving (SSI disability). How does that make you feel about the State?

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GIpyGQxa2ZY&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GIpyGQxa2ZY&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

I didn't say I understood your entire belief system (as I don't know you that well). I was referring to a specific issue. Since you managed to entirely dodge my point, I'll accept that you have no reasonable reply. This also accounts for your ad hominems against autarchism. I'm whittling away at you, I can see it! I'll make a believer of you yet.