Recent content by njandrewg

true, but then you don't go around saying "haha I raised 185K to Ron Paul's 60K, its an obvious show that Ron Paul is a loser"

Nathan Hale is an obvious Pedenbot, seriously dude, your guy is losing by like 40%, he has raised only about 25K and the rest was donated by himself and his family. Those 2 newspapers you tout have always endorsed Ron Paul challengers. They especially like to endorse Democratic challengers...

:confused:

or liberterian. I mean think about it, the Republican party loyalists want to screw him over anyways(hell on hannity forums they are promoting that piden guy to help him defeat Paul in the primaries. So why not run as a 3rd party, denounce both parties for pro-big government He'll have a few...

they are doing it because there are now 2 of them left(to the media). Remember the last debate? Huck got almost as little time as Ron. If Romney didn't drop out he wouldn't get as much time

yeah we forgot your average voter is a moron: a) almost all anti-war voters voted for him because they think he wants to get out of Iraq b) they still remember the McCain who spoke out against the other wars c) the ads he ran in this state, only stated that he saw that the Old strategy wasn't...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPyKpcivQYQ

I think the reason he is dropping out, is because his people told him that he is pissing good money after bad, and that he should run in 2012 because the republicans have a low chance of winning in 08

Democrat, which is why they are pushing for McCain, Romney and Huckabee because it'll let the Dems have a much easier time in the general election

we are still very competitive, we raised 4.1mm in January. And we all know that the first month is ALWAYS much worse. If I remember correctly September we had something like 2mm.

why not wait till the Feb 1 money bomb?

also keep in mind that these campaign people are essentially on call 24/7. And also might want to look up how much the other guys are spending

No, they should be doing their jobs and writing unbiased articles. And regardless, the spin of the article has nothing to do with the writer, it has to do with the editor or whatever giving orders

I'd like to know where Romney's people came from: i.e. look at Democrats 78% reported: Clinton and Obama each have about 4,500 people each in a Democratic State Republicans we have Paul and McCain with 4,300. ANd Romney somehow has 17,000 in a democratic state with 38% reporting

turn on any news station its MItt @45 I think, and then Paul and McCain at 15%