Using the narrow scope of your definition we could say the state of America changed following the American Revolution when it transitioned from a monarchy to confederation. We could say the state of America changed when the Constitution was adopted when it transitioned from a confederation...
That is a non-argument. The issue is simple. The burden of proof is on he who makes the claim. You are and have been claiming the Constitution does not apply to people. I find it extremely difficult to believe those individuals who participated in the convention were ignorant there was...
You are the one claiming the Constitution does not apply to the people beginning in the OP.
You also asserted:
and haven't proven that one either ...
No. In the post I wrote I didn't even mention the BoR. The BoR came after anything I mentioned as well. I can provide some legal citations...
Let's assume for a moment government knows best just for giggles and grins to argue the OP. I do not understand how one can promote the Constitution yet claim it does not apply to people. Let us take into consideration for a moment how government has interpreted it. In order to amend the AoC...
Dude, I wasn't trying to solve a problem. The whole point of the thread was to stimulate ideas about making the word stand into a graphic where it appeared as a person standing. It is just a cotton picking idea. Hell, its probably already been thought of by someone. This thread has been...
OoOoOo a perceptive individual who can read. Ok so give me a better comeback in the following scenario: My next blowjob at this point in life is probably only going to come from a hooker or me figuring out how to do it myself.
Since I couldn't think of a good hooker comeback and I am not...
This is the only objection statists can mount anymore and it is one of hypocrisy which means it is not a real, legitimate objection. It has already been pointed out why it is a hypocritical argument because no limited government has ever remained limited. When confronted with this historical...
I like how people who see a dick have audacity to comment or infer I am somehow fucked up. Read a little psychology ... perception is in the eye of the fucked up beholder.
Yes, it is about making the word Stand look like a person standing. I stated I am not putting a lot of effort into this, just sharing a concept. Upon first glance it appears there are a couple ways to go about it. One is to get a letter T in a font where the top of the T extends out as arms...
Well, some do get it and the potential of polishing it up. For instance:
RE:
I stated in the OP I have zero interest discussing Rand. Since both of you have been around a while you should have a clue about the forum history and its posters ... especially you Dr. 3D but then again you also...
That is something for a graphic designer to work out. I agree with your point and made the T and A slightly larger above as well. In addition, with some fonts the top of the T extends farther to even further the effect. Some A's are more symmetrical with little curly ends and something like...
First, you politically correct thought police a-holes ban me into oblivion for ... well doesn't matter. Second, I could care all that less about Rand because he has already clearly demonstrated he is not campaigning on end the fed and change foreign policy. I don't even want to discuss Rand...