People here should understand that you have the power to nullify any law that you deem as unjust, one defendant at a time.
The most important right you have, and one which cannot be taken away can be found on this page:
http://www.fija.org/docs/jurors_handbook_a_citizens_guide_to_jury_duty.pdf...
Ban me. I'm a Ron Paul supporter, including a monetary supporter. I go through hell arguing the correctness of his views to everyone I meet, and have swayed several that would not have been swayed otherwise.
And look up my posts, 90% of them support Ron Paul. But I refuse to believe there is...
A boat filled with boxes, speeding towards a US warship in International Waters isn't a threat? I beg to differ with that leftist rag "democracy now".
History has already proven that historian wrong.
The Iranians should have been blown out of the water.
No, when white supremacists and troothers align themselves as your freind you immediately denounce them. Guilt by association is reality, whether or not it should be means nothing. He's running for president, and using a lot of my money to do it. He better take it seroiusly and publicly denounce...
I didn't think he handled it well, and his supporters in the crowd applauding didn't help. He had a chance to denounce them. To announce that he is not their friend, and will not help to further any of their causes, and instead came off looking like he wanted to change the subject.
I've never heard him say it, and didn't see any of the videos posted above. But always had a pretty good feeling that his first week in office would involve the pardoning of 10's if not 100's of thousands of people in prison. Every non violent drug user, and every person convicted of tax...
It's nothing to do with Bush. It's actually a credit to Ron Paul's policy. For the mullahs to distract their own people they needed something to rally around. An imminent attack from the U.S. played right into their hands.
The state departments announcement last month erased the mullahs power...
He linked to one site, it crashed due to traffic, so he added another link. Both sites began to fill with 99.9% comments FOR Ron Paul, with nothing but hundreds of different points of view on how it was a pure smear campaign, and completely discredited the actual article. I think once Drudge and...
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2007/12/27/study-fox-most-fair-balanced-thus-far-prez-campaign and FOX is singing that study from the hilltops.
It's alright though. If there's no desire to prove that study wrong. So be it.
From drudgereport
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash.htm
CNN MOVES ON FOX: PLANS RERUN DEBATE AS REPUBLICANS GO LIVE
Sun Jan 06 2008 12:24:15 ET
CNN has decided to air an encore presentation of last night's ABCWMURFACEBOOK debates - at the same time FOXNEWS is airing its live Republican...
No, they just broadcast the independent study done that shows they are the most fair and balanced. It was a study which put them as the most balanced in both positive and negative coverage of Democrats and republicans.
Its OK though. Just an idea. Carry on...
That's the point. On what evidence do you base this bias accusation? They don't mention him? Prove your point. The average Joe would say you are the one with bias. Fox is fair and balanced. They say so, and there isn't hard evidence to the contrary. You have no numbers to back your claim.
Because it wont give them extra ratings. It isn't sweeps week, the 50 additional viewers out of their normal 10 million wont be counted, and if so, won't even be a blip. And the information would prove bias, thus potentially reducing their ratings.
I think there should be some organized effort to watch the FOX coverage on Tuesday and count the number of times Ron Paul's name is mentioned and printed on the screen. It would probably take 50 people. All of the other mentions of other candidates would need to be counted as well.
Why?
For...