If people defended themselves with lethal force, pursuant to state laws whose constitutionality the federal government does not dispute, against criminals who happen to work for the federal government committing crimes against them in violation...
It only has the same prerequisites as any other use of lethal force. Their position in the government doesn't shield them from that.
Fortunately, there are 28 states that already recognize this in their laws.
Actual photo of nickers' family:
I am not overthrowing anything. The US Government overthrew itself the moment it nullified the Constitution. We The People have always had the power to ABOLISH and REPLACE it. For 150+ years, we have not...
Being an agent of the federal government doesn't give someone a special right to kidnap peeople.
We may not have the power to fire them for doing that (it's naive to think we do). But fortunately in 28 states we do have the legally recognized...
Kidnapping someone is not a mild inconvenience. It is a violent criminal act. Use of deadly force to defend yourself or another person against a criminal attempting to do this is justifiable.
Don't you agree?
Kidnapping you is not just mildly inconveniencing you. It is an act of violence that warrants the use of force to defend yourself or another person who is the victim of this.
If someone had defended this person against this by shooting and...
In preparation for scenarios like that, this list may come in handy.
https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-law-basics/states-that-have-stand-your-ground-laws.html
Unsurprisingly, Minnesota is on the duty-t0-retreat list and not on the...