I remember Perry being critical of the Federal Reserve. Cruz may be the bankers way to kill two birds with one stone. Rand Paul and Perry. I see that Christy's wife also worked for a Wall Street firm, Cantor-Fitzgerald I believe.
looks to me like the establishment is setting up either Christy or Bush to win next time around. Their seems to be some hesitation developing around Christy or maybe this latest news on his being rejected by Romney is just to get that news out of the way early. Seems Hillary is being propped up...
I saw that Drudge had an article that GoldmanSachs paid Hillary 400000 for 2 speeches that were almost back-to-back. They just may be orchestrating who they want to be the candidates.
well cant find article I was thinking of but here is a link from daily paul liberty forum with other links http://www.dailypaul.com/235714/shockingly-deep-ties-to-goldman-sachs-threaten-ted-cruzs-senate-bid and another link...
I think the opening post got it exactly right.
Cruz has the rhetoric of an outsider but the resume of an insider.
The Goldman Sachs support of his Senate run very telling.
on your first point they should be made aware on hiring it might happen and that they will either still have to work or accept less than full backpay for time off.
2nd, Where else are they going to go? especially with the excessive pay they get?
Why in the heck would you give federal workers full back-pay for 13 days off. These people are overpaid to begin with. There is some value in the days off of work for them. I think it was a huge mistake to give them full back-pay.
What we need is a national initiative option...more public in the Republic
This is something a number of states have. The nation of Switzerland also has this option and it is generally considered to be a well run country.