Yemen opposes any US troops in terror fight

[reduen]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100106/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_yemen_al_qaida

 

[Fiscal Conservative]

We were suppose to be the "liberators" in Iraq, but instead, we gave the Iraqi citizens a front-row seat to their first sightings of a suicide bomb attack. The civilians that were caught in the crossfire that led to either wounded or casualty also led many to become rebelious towards our occupation within their country. The insurgency should have been a great example, but of course, with our policies, we stuck around. Not to mention, the motivation led to many taking up arms with Al Qaeda. So we were, and still are, giving the enemy a reason to grow in numbers.

The message has been clear, and it's been clear many years now, they do not want us over there. The more we spread the act of violence towards other countries in the Middle East, not only is going to be more money spent, but it's going to escalate more terrorism.

If we were to begin occupying Yemen, the violence would have spread more due to our intervention policies, and more money to be spent in order to maintain the theory that has basically broke us down almost completely here at home.

 

[Romulus]

That's ok. They'll do what needs to be done under the radar in Yemen anyway.

 

[Vegetarianist]

The FM says that in public. I doubt it's the same in private.