WikiLeaks to Release 'Very Important Secret Document' Tomorrow

Lucille

Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2007
Messages
15,019
Still holding out hope wikileaks has all the Snowden docs.

http://reason.com/blog/2014/06/18/wikileaks-to-release-very-important-secr

"Tomorrow we will release a very important secret document," announced WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson earlier today.

Hrafnsson was participating in a press conference with Julian Assange, the founder of the information-leaking media organization. Tomorrow marks two years that Assange has been confined within the Ecuadorian embassy in London, which is surrounded at all hours by police.

Hrafnsson hinted that tomorrow's leak will be significant to "international negotiations" but said that he couldn't give any more details.

Assange added that "there are 50 countries involved" in tomorrow's disclosure.

I assume it's on the TPP negotiations.

He would not provide details and would not confirm or deny whether the file was related to the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the trade deal being negotiated with 12 countries, including Canada. Late last year, WikiLeaks caused a minor sensation when it published a draft text of the agreement, triggering questions from lawyers about its apparently American-centric view on intellectual property rights.

“You’ll have to check the website tomorrow,” is all he would say.

Assange spoke on a range of topics, criticizing the U.S. government and, in particular, President Barack Obama:

Obama should start to reflect on what [his] legacy will be after two presidential terms. It must be at odds with a former professor of constitutional law to have a legacy that involves the construction of extra-judicial kill lists of individuals including American citizens [and] a legacy of being the president who conducted more Espionage Act investigations against journalists … than all previous presidents combined going back to 1917. ...

It is against the stated principles of the United States and I believe the values supported by its people, to have a four-year criminal investigation against a publisher. The ongoing existence of that investigation produces a chilling effect, not just on internet based publishers, but all publishers.

Questioned about his own legacy and why he hasn't produced a groundbreaking leak in several years, Assange said, "I think the best answer to that question was given by the author of Catch-22 when it was put to him that he hadn't eclipsed his novel, and the response of course is, well, neither has anyone else."
 
Stay tuned boys and girls for the next exciting episode of "Wikileaks and the Very Important Secret Document". :D
 
Julian Assange said:
It must be at odds with a former professor of constitutional law to have a legacy that involves the construction of extra-judicial kill lists of individuals including American citizens [and] a legacy of being the president who conducted more Espionage Act investigations against journalists … than all previous presidents combined going back to 1917.

Only if you assume that "constitutional law" has something to do with what the Constitution actually says, Mr. Assange.
(As opposed to what federal judicial hacks & lick-spittles - not to mention "professors of constitutional law" - have said.)
 
vChAYtt.jpg
 
At the time of your post, the day was half over where Assange is located.

And yet as seen above, the leak was timed differently than Assange's location. Adjust your specs, mate. Assange timed the leak for the Western world.
 
Yeaw I wonder if they aren't getting money for traffic. Lot of hype for nothing much.
 
And yet as seen above, the leak was timed differently than Assange's location. Adjust your specs, mate. Assange timed the leak for the Western world.

My spec's are just fine, the UK and most of the EU is considered the "western world."
 
Just more perks for the multinational TBTF bankstas.

https://wikileaks.org/tisa-financial/analysis.html

The rules apply to measures that ‘affect’ the supply of financial services through foreign direct investment (commercial establishment) or offshore provision by remote delivery or services purchased in another country (cross-border). They also aim to ‘discipline’ governments in favour of a light handed and self-regulatory model of financial regulation. The substantive rules target what the financial services industry sees as obstacles to its seamless global operations, including:
  1. limits on the size of financial institutions (too big to fail);
  2. restrictions on activities (eg deposit taking banks that also trade on their own account);
  3. requiring foreign investment through subsidiaries (regulated by the host) rather than branches (regulated from their parent state);
  4. requiring that financial data is held onshore;
  5. limits on funds transfers for cross-border transactions (e-finance);
  6. authorisation of cross-border providers;
  7. state monopolies on pension funds or disaster insurance;
  8. disclosure requirements on offshore operations in tax havens;
  9. certain transactions must be conducted through public exchanges, rather than invisible over-the counter operations;
  10. approval for sale of ‘innovative’ (potentially toxic) financial products;
  11. regulation of credit rating agencies or financial advisers;
  12. controls on hot money inflows and outflows of capital;
  13. requirements that a majority of directors are locally domiciled;
  14. authorisation and regulation of hedge funds; etc.



Finance industry has captured global rule making

The development of global finance rules under the guise of ‘trade’ was the brainchild of senior executives of AIG, American Express, Citicorp and Merrill Lynch in the late 1970s. Their role, and subsequently a broader lobby called the Financial Leaders Group, is well documented. The former director of the WTO’s services division himself acknowledged in 1997 that: ‘Without the enormous pressure generated by the American financial services sector, particularly companies like American Express and Citicorp, there would have been no services agreement’.16

As the lobby evolved it was still led from Wall Street, but expanded to include the major insurance and banking institutions, investment banks and auxiliary financial services providers, from funds managers to credit-rating agencies and even the news agency Reuters. They were later joined by the e-finance and electronic payments industry, which includes credit, stored value and loyalty cards, ATM management, and payment systems operators like PayPal.

The industry lobbyists have also set the demands for financial services in TISA. The Chairman of the Board of the US Coalition of Service Industries is the Vice Chairman of the Institutional Clients Group at Citi. When the industry’s demands, as expressed in the consultation on TISA conducted by the US Trade Representative in 2013, are matched against the leaked text it becomes clear that they stand to get most of what they asked for. Extracts from their submissions are listed at the end of this document.
 
bump.... This is worthy of attention. Seems there is so much underhanded shit going down these days, that I cant devote enough attention to all the corruption.
 
bump.... This is worthy of attention. Seems there is so much underhanded shit going down these days, that I cant devote enough attention to all the corruption.

I think that's part of their strategy!

Hunt for Money & TiSA Negotiations Leaked by WikiLeaks
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/06/22/hunt-for-money-tisa-negotiations-leaked-by-wikileaks/

Leaked WikiLeaks documents reveal the Abbott government in Australia is moving with the EU and the USA in a secret trade negotiation that is aimed at bringing about radical deregulation of international banking and finance sector. While this Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA) negotiations, reported by The Age, show Australian trade negotiators are working on a financial services agenda that could end the Australian government’s ”four pillars” banking policy and allow foreign banks much greater freedom to operate in Australia, there is also a secret agenda according to our sources that go hand in hand with global reporting of anyone who has accounts outside their home country. This is under the cloud of deregulating financial institutions when in fact it is also ensuring transparency for government tax authorities to hunt money internationally.

All financial data will be freely transferred overseas. This is the main objective. I was in Brussels for meetings. The most interesting aspect of this trip was they stopped me at customs because I was dressed in a suit and tie. It was clearly a money hunt inspection. I produced my passport and they wanted to see where I bought the ticket. I clearly would not have owed taxes on some imported trinkets and there were no questions regarding that. It was simply a stop and check to see if I was moving money between countries and where was I domiciled. This is the FIRST time I have ever been stopped ever. Let’s see what happens when I return to the States.
 
Back
Top