Why Was Bin Laden Buried At Sea So Quickly?

Because there was no bin Laden to bury at sea. And that is, of course, a problem of sorts. This official story is even more cheese ball-ish than the 9-11 fairytale.

I will say one thing: somebody must be feeling a bit desperate to do this. Something must not be going quite the way they want. Why risk exposure, blowback, or other unintended consequences unless you were desperate?
 
Last edited:
If they are covering something up, its like they aren't even trying to do a good job of it...
 
Anyone ever heard that George Strait song Ocean Front Property? This whole episode reminds me of that one...
 
Its very strange. When we got Hussein we showed him off like a trophy, and when we get Bin Laden we don't even get a picture?

The details of the operation sound somewhat realistic and achievable to me though.

But seriously, a burial at sea? At least bury his body at sea in front of the public if it was really over burying him in accordance with Islam's rules. It could even be done from a live feed if that was really necessary for some reason. But I mean this is a joke because our government has disrespected and slandered Islam for a long time now, so why suddenly start being respectful of Islam?

This story is very strange.
 
The official story is to conform to Islamic law about burials being within a certain time frame. They also supposedly do not want his grave to become a shrine - like where he was killed won't be?
 
If the time frame was the issue, they could at least video tape his burial or do a live feed. Pictures. Something.
 
this is so absurd - the idea that their story is based on how seriously they wanted to abide by Islamic law, and that people actually believe this, is beyond me...
 
Because there was no bin Laden to bury at sea. And that is, of course, a problem of sorts. This official story is even more cheese ball-ish than the 9-11 fairytale.

I will say one thing: somebody must be feeling a bit desperate to do this. Something must not be going quite the way they want. Why risk exposure, blowback, or other unintended consequences unless you were desperate?

Interesting timing with the never before seen long form birth certificate coming out. Which I still don't know what to make of because they made it more of an issue for some of us coming out with the stupid thing. Now they raise Bin Laden up again and bury him at sea with hours? I feel like the citizens are the abused spouse where the s.o. lies constantly and no matter how ridiculous the lie they are too afraid to break the relationship ties because the misery they know is better than the misery they don't know.

The media coverage is bizarre and the story is so lame that it makes the Wag The Dog scenes look more plausible than this crap. The whole coverage of celebrations was nauseating and disturbing and seemed like contrived movie footage.
 
It pisses me off.

After bin Laden was killed in a raid by U.S. forces in Pakistan, senior administration officials said the body would be handled according to Islamic practice and tradition. That practice calls for the body to be buried within 24 hours, the official said. Finding a country willing to accept the remains of the world's most wanted terrorist would have been difficult, the official said. So the U.S. decided to bury him at sea.

Would it really have been difficult? I doubt it. Vox labels it "trainwreck."

But it strikes me that if you wanted to make your own words more look suspiciously incredible, you would be hard-pressed to top the recent actions of the Obama administration.
[...]
The whole point of engaging in a helicopter raid rather than simply dropping a daisy cutter was to obtain the body. As one British journalist noted: "The decision to carry out a helicopter assault was incredibly risky but the US Navy SEALS and the CIA pulled it off. The huge advantage is that it means that bin Laden’s body was recovered – any speculation that he remains alive is likely to be shortlived."

Unless, of course, the body is immediately thrown into the sea.... But whether the most recent reports of bin Laden's death is real or not, they should at least serve as an excuse to get out of Afghanistan and Iraq before Libya heats up in response to Qaddafi's likely efforts at retaliation following the reported death of his youngest son. [...]

I'm not saying they needed to stick bin Laden's head on a pike at the White House, but providing independent confirmation from a third party such as the Saudi ambassador or one of his family members would have been significantly more convincing than a press release about a body dumped in the ocean.
 
Okay I can buy that we would honor muslim tradition to avoid blowback or whatever. However, if I am to buy that the tradition we were honoring was burying the body within 24 hours, wouldn't that mean we were supposed to do it a week ago when we "actually" killed him. This story is full of more holes than a block of swiss cheese.
 
Okay I can buy that we would honor muslim tradition to avoid blowback or whatever. However, if I am to buy that the tradition we were honoring was burying the body within 24 hours, wouldn't that mean we were supposed to do it a week ago when we "actually" killed him. This story is full of more holes than a block of swiss cheese.

Except it's not honoring Muslim tradition, as Agorism pointed out: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?290352-Muslim-laws-against-sea-burial
 
Now when the patriot act comes up for renewal again in December, it's going to be a no brainer. Gotta renew it! Thank God that we have the legislation already written to protect the collective from the the coming backlash. /s

People are such stupid fucks.
 
If Mccain had been elected and this happened, his head with his cutoff penis in his mouth would be on a pike on the whitehouse lawn. while mccain and his buddies danced around a bonfire covered in his blood.
 
How do we know they REALLY buried him at sea?

After all, this IS coming from the government, and anything they say needs to be received with skepticism.
 
Back
Top