Why it's 1873 South Carolina all over again...

[Snowball]

There are certain uncomfortable truths about Reconstruction and post-Reconstruction (up to the 1890's) that certain groups who are in power today wish to conceal and misrepresent. Those groups, to be frank about it, are Blacks and Jews. The Jews were the primary carpetbaggers. They were backed by the Northern and foreign banks, and this was the same time they were setting up a judicial and media/education takeover by establishing the NAACP, and other socialist orgs, like the ADL, and the Zionist movement, including the foreign plot to establish the Central Bank and income tax in the USA which achieved fruition in 1913 by the London and NY Jewish oligarchy. They promoted Black interests in order to manage them and turn them against Whites, whose power they wanted to take down because the bankers want socialism, and the Blacks were/are their unwitting proxy warriors.

I'm going to show you some proof that's not taught in schools. Proof of what Black political power looked like in the 1870's when they reached a 3/4 demographic advantage in South Carolina. You see, South Carolina white men got killed in the war, and Columbia was run down hard by the carpetbagger gangs.

Notice the phrase "alien white men joined the Negro majority WHICH THEY LED" in this article below. Now, think about what the level of Black political corruption in power was, why they issued milions in new debts and destroyed South Carolina's public trust at their own benefit, blowing up the budget to insolvency? Who were the masterminds that abused the natural urges of the Negro majority It's what they want TODAY. It's what has ALREADY HAPPENED. Who approves of all this debt and corruption? The BANKERS DO. This is WHY the Blacks had to be brought up North to turn it into a DEMOCRAT/SOCIALIST stronghold. They flipped New York and all of New England and the Upper Midwest eventually by bringing up the Blacks in the 1960's. They already had the template for what the Blacks want politically because the Blacks and Jews ruled South Carolina after the Civil War.

The Black majority of the Assembly was supported by a Jewish governor, Franklin Israel Moses, Jr. (Franklin J. Moses Jr.). See here and here.
He is known as the "robber governor" of South Carolina. Franklin adopted Episcopalian and Republican trappings in order to forward his political ambitions. See here and here.

An actual Northern abolitionist lawyer, Joseph S. Pike, went down to South Carolina in 1873 and first-hand witnessed it all, writing a book about what he saw happening. That book was called "The Prostrate State: South Carolina under Negro government", published in early 1874.

Here is a newspaper editorial about it with some rather salient and revealing quotes. All the math and facts have never been disputed. The only thing today's fake historians can say is, this abolitionist, he was "racist". But to be honest with you, only ONE academic historian even mentions this, and he was Black, and called Pike a racist, even though he wasn't. So, you see how real American history has been transformed to suit the agenda, like a malleable play-doh from which facts and the actual reports and thoughts and causalities expressed AT THE TIME are ignored in favor of the agenda. See what I'm writing here? It's not allowed in over 95% of American universities today, it is anathema to even present the truth objectively anymore. Go to the heading "A Prostrate State" in this newspaper link: https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn8402...+of+the+age"+&sp=1&r=0.64,0.355,0.432,0.181,0

 

[Snowball]

One may discern the seed that sprouted our current state of affairs socially in letters such as this.

Joseph C. Lovejoy went on a tour of the antebellum South, right before the War Between The States.
Lovejoy, and Owen, whom he is addressing here, were both brothers of the murdered abolitionist Elijah Lovejoy.

Joseph is not pro-slavery. He's just asking his brother up North to consider what's happening, and the best way to politically conduct any dissolution of slavery... peaceably, democratically, from within. Instead, the country was thrown into its worst turmoil. He says better to allow slaveholding to migrate to new states in the West, along with abolitionism, then let these new states, after their admission to the Union, decide for themselves at the State Level whether or not to outlaw the practice. This is a proposition that would have likely warded off the Civil War. He thought the nature and aspect of abolitionism was going to cause more harm than good. It was 1859, and he was right.

But there are just a few sentences I wanted to draw attention to, and it's not about slavery, it's about the seeds of secular humanism, the fruit from which we are living in our times.

The letter is only 12 pages.

There are visible footprints of God's disapprobation of the abolitionism of this country. Look at the flocks of unclean beasts and birds that have come up out of its train. Infidels that curse God, abuse every man of good character, and then praise humanity in general to counterbalance their malignity and blasphemy. Out of the abstract rights of man have grown the more abstract rights of woman ; and once respectable wives call St. Paul a crusty old bachelor,and Abraham a tyrant, because Sarah obeyed him, and Paul makes mention of the fact. The second edition of the rights of woman is divorce, " affinity," and universal concubinage. We have far more of these immoral tendencies in the northern States than they have at the South. Is it not time to look at home?

https://ia601302.us.archive.org/5/items/northsouth00love/northsouth00love.pdf

btw, I hadn't known about Joseph Lovejoy's letter to his brother Owen.
I heard it mentioned in passing while watching Peter Helland and E. Michael Jones last night. Dr. Jones really packs as much info and truth bombs as can be packed.