Pheonix
Member
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2011
- Messages
- 84
What I don't understand is why the campaign is depending on the grassroots and moneybombs for all of their fundraising. Why can't they hire some fundraising experts who can go out and host banquets for Ron Paul, charging a couple hundred dollars a plate to meet the guy? The way the Romney and Obama campaigns have raised money in past quarters is by appointing several dozen people the task of raising a couple hundred thousand dollars, and they go out to various communities to solicit funds; why doesn't the official campaign replicate this by hiring individuals dedicated for this specific job of collecting funds?
Also, why don't they copy Romney's fundraising scheme by hiring a couple hundred staff (or even having us volunteer) for a day to make thousands of phone calls to all of the RP supporters from 07 and 12, soliciting funds/pledges? People are more willing to donate when you talk to them in person. This argument from the campaign that we don't need Romney-style money doesn't make sense. We're running a campaign against the odds of polls, against the mainstream media, against 100 years of pre-established notions. Heck yes we need Romney-style money!
I don't understand why the campaign is placing their full reliance in the grassroots and moneybombs this time for practically all of their funds. They need to raise money via traditional means as well. We're no longer a grassroots campaign like in 07. We should be running a traditional top-tier campaign WITH a grassroots organization to support it even more.
I hope this is taken as constructive criticism for the campaign. I know they're trying their best, but I think these points may be beneficial for them to consider...
Also, I think they should set up a pledge page prior to entering the website (as all the other campaigns do), that way they'll have a larger email list of supporters to request for funds. Instead of asking the same 30k people for money each moneybomb, they could expand this to 100k easy by just having this pledge page (those numbers are made up). The grassroots always struggles to reach enough people for the moneybombs; this way the campaign can reach many times more people with just one email.
Also, why don't they copy Romney's fundraising scheme by hiring a couple hundred staff (or even having us volunteer) for a day to make thousands of phone calls to all of the RP supporters from 07 and 12, soliciting funds/pledges? People are more willing to donate when you talk to them in person. This argument from the campaign that we don't need Romney-style money doesn't make sense. We're running a campaign against the odds of polls, against the mainstream media, against 100 years of pre-established notions. Heck yes we need Romney-style money!
I don't understand why the campaign is placing their full reliance in the grassroots and moneybombs this time for practically all of their funds. They need to raise money via traditional means as well. We're no longer a grassroots campaign like in 07. We should be running a traditional top-tier campaign WITH a grassroots organization to support it even more.
I hope this is taken as constructive criticism for the campaign. I know they're trying their best, but I think these points may be beneficial for them to consider...
Also, I think they should set up a pledge page prior to entering the website (as all the other campaigns do), that way they'll have a larger email list of supporters to request for funds. Instead of asking the same 30k people for money each moneybomb, they could expand this to 100k easy by just having this pledge page (those numbers are made up). The grassroots always struggles to reach enough people for the moneybombs; this way the campaign can reach many times more people with just one email.


Last edited: