osan
Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2009
- Messages
- 16,866
https://iamtherabbithole.substack.com/p/what-im-not-a-biologist-revealed?s=w
During her confirmation hearing, Jackson tried to evade the question of the definition of a "woman" by citing that she's "not a biologist", in an attempt to be clever, when in fact she was ever so insufficient to the task.
Stay with me now, ignoring for the moment her embarrassingly transparent attempt at evasion, thus revealing her corrupt self for what she really is.
By responding with "I'm not a biologist", she inadvertently admitted that the broader and far more significant question is in fact one of biology. She openly conceded by direct implication that “gender” is based in biology, while clearly attempting to evade the issue entirely by refusing to define “woman”. Hoisted by her own petard, she has exposed herself as a very weak tactician who knows the truth, endeavors to conceal it, but has not the chops to do so competently. This is SCOTUS material? I think not nearly.
She comes off as just another "minority" who got into law school by virtue of status conferred solely by morphology, and nothing to do with innate capacity, much as we see with Obama. There is precious small doubt that she made it through law school by the skin of her skin, and only through the intercession of hands invisible, which doled passing grades sufficient to give her the degree without raising eyebrows. One can only wonder what chicanery might have been employed to get her past the BAR examination.
Jackson strikes as just another flailing under-achiever whose position is gifted, not earned. Being placed on the high court, not on the merits of ability and character, but by mere dint of biological specifications that have no relevance, all for the purposes of some dishonest and deleterious political expediency, will serve long and well to further the ruin of American life. Compare with Justice Clarence Thomas, who is a scholarly man of a dignified and credible bearing, and we see how dangerously corrupted the motivations must be, which underpin this nomination.
Sadly, none of the right people are likely to notice Jackson’s error and the opportunity it presents for exposing the truth, much less putting that factuality of it to good and proper use, which would be to corner and further expose this candidate as wholly and dangerously unequal to the tasks the position demands. Why not just confirm an average sixth-grader? We might at least then expect some measure of honesty and personal integrity.
Lastly, consider this: the situation is a win-win for Democrats. If confirmed, they get their resident obedient on the high-court. If not, they get to shriek and howl "RACIST!" day and night, right into November.
But since we're all living on planet Bizarro, Jackson will likely be confirmed, to the delight of those who love evil, and the furthered ruin of the rest.
Until next time, please accept my best wishes.
During her confirmation hearing, Jackson tried to evade the question of the definition of a "woman" by citing that she's "not a biologist", in an attempt to be clever, when in fact she was ever so insufficient to the task.
Stay with me now, ignoring for the moment her embarrassingly transparent attempt at evasion, thus revealing her corrupt self for what she really is.
By responding with "I'm not a biologist", she inadvertently admitted that the broader and far more significant question is in fact one of biology. She openly conceded by direct implication that “gender” is based in biology, while clearly attempting to evade the issue entirely by refusing to define “woman”. Hoisted by her own petard, she has exposed herself as a very weak tactician who knows the truth, endeavors to conceal it, but has not the chops to do so competently. This is SCOTUS material? I think not nearly.
She comes off as just another "minority" who got into law school by virtue of status conferred solely by morphology, and nothing to do with innate capacity, much as we see with Obama. There is precious small doubt that she made it through law school by the skin of her skin, and only through the intercession of hands invisible, which doled passing grades sufficient to give her the degree without raising eyebrows. One can only wonder what chicanery might have been employed to get her past the BAR examination.
Jackson strikes as just another flailing under-achiever whose position is gifted, not earned. Being placed on the high court, not on the merits of ability and character, but by mere dint of biological specifications that have no relevance, all for the purposes of some dishonest and deleterious political expediency, will serve long and well to further the ruin of American life. Compare with Justice Clarence Thomas, who is a scholarly man of a dignified and credible bearing, and we see how dangerously corrupted the motivations must be, which underpin this nomination.
Sadly, none of the right people are likely to notice Jackson’s error and the opportunity it presents for exposing the truth, much less putting that factuality of it to good and proper use, which would be to corner and further expose this candidate as wholly and dangerously unequal to the tasks the position demands. Why not just confirm an average sixth-grader? We might at least then expect some measure of honesty and personal integrity.
Lastly, consider this: the situation is a win-win for Democrats. If confirmed, they get their resident obedient on the high-court. If not, they get to shriek and howl "RACIST!" day and night, right into November.
But since we're all living on planet Bizarro, Jackson will likely be confirmed, to the delight of those who love evil, and the furthered ruin of the rest.
Until next time, please accept my best wishes.
