What If Someone Could See Everything You’ve Ever Googled?

Joined
Sep 20, 2011
Messages
13,839
What If Someone Could See Everything You’ve Ever Googled?

What If Someone Could See Everything You’ve Ever Googled?

strong>Inalienably Yours
Wednesday, February 15, 2012

google11.jpg


What if there was a little box that could be placed in your home that could…..

…. track every Google search that you ran?

…. see who you email?

…. see from whom you receive emails?

…. watch your keystrokes to learn all your passwords?

…. turn on a camera and watch you at any given time?

…. gather information about your likes, dislikes, political affiliations and religious beliefs?

…. dispense all of the above personal data to fusion centers, whose only purpose is to put together profiles of you and your family?

As it turns out, there is such a box, and if you are reading this, you’re on it right now. You not only voluntarily brought this device into your home, you paid good money for it. Your computer is spying on you.

The home computer is bar none the greatest information sharing device ever created. We can study anything our little hearts desire. We can meet other people anywhere on the globe who have similar interests to us. We can be kept constantly up to date with news, communication with friends and family and updates to our inboxes about myriad topics.

Unfortunately there is a dark side to having a home computer. A home computer means that someone else could have constant access to US.

Here are just a few little tricks that your computer may be up to, unbeknownst to you.

GOOGLE:

Google has the best reputation in the world as a search engine extraordinaire. But the times are changing and Google is becoming less and less trustworthy.

First there is the Gmail scandal. If you are a user of the free email service, you may have noticed that the ads running down the side of the homepage seem uniquely targeted to your current interests. That is precisely because they ARE – Gmail scans every single email sent, gleaning information for “advertisers”. That’s right, every single email you send through Gmail is read. Apparently it is read by a computer, but the point is, your emails are not private. Password, smassword.

Next there is the issue of censored searches. Unless you specifically use keywords that will hook you up with alternative news sources, Google searches are now directing you towards the most politically correct answers. Gone are the days when you can simply type in, for example, 9/11, and find information that is provided based on ratings – now you actually need to already have the source that you want the information from to get a clear picture…for example, “Infowars 9/11. Some websites, like Infowars, are no longer coming up in Google searches unless you include them in your search terms. At the end of 2010, Google blacklisted Infowars and Prison Planet from it’s search aggregates, despite the fact that those sites get more hits than many mainstream media sites that show up front and center.

Finally, let’s talk about Google’s new “privacy policy.” As it turns out, that policy isn’t keeping very much private at all. As of March 1, in an effort to its ads to the tastes of individual consumers, Google will integrate information from all of it’s services, including the search engine itself, Youtube and the aforementioned Gmail. Google refers to this as a “more intuitive Google experience.” Unfortunately for users who prefer more privacy, there is no option to “opt out” of this information gathering and sharing. Check out THIS ARTICLE that recently appeared in The Washington Post for more information on the new lack-of-privacy policy.

YAHOO

Not to be outdone, Yahoo also “analyzes” the content of your emails. And according to their guide for compliance with law enforcement officers, Yahoo hangs on to your information for far longer than the privacy policy states they will. Here are some alarming statistics, directly from Yahoo, wrapped up in a menu-priced
17 PAGE GUIDE

~ All IP addresses that you use to log into your Yahoo mail account are retained for one year, giving an excellent way to track your movements, find your workplace, or see who you visit.
~ Instant messages and chats are logged for a minimum of 60 days.
~ The information provided to law enforcement agencies is not a matter of civic duty – the major communications companies all have “price lists”. The US Marshall Service admitted to having PRICE LISTS FOR DATA INTERCEPTION SERVICES from Yahoo, Verizon, Cox Communications, and ComCast.

FACEBOOK

Over half a billion people worldwide voluntarily provide information about their personal lives, their friends, their families, their religious beliefs and their political agendas on Facebook.

Nowhere can be found a bigger fountain of personal information. As a way to increase the information Facebook learns about it’s users, when a person is logged into Facebook on a computer, a cookie tracks all other sites visited on that same computer. If you are logged into Facebook, the door to your home computer usage is wide open.

Facebook uses facial recognition technology to “tag” people in photographs. Facebook is also like the evil town gossips, making assumptions about you based on who your friends are. Ads that are targeted to your “friends” can also make it onto your own page. Facebook figures you’ll have the same interests.

Facebook uses GPS technology to post the location where photographs have been taken and/or uploaded, making even your physical location public information.

Skype

Purchased in May of 2011 by MICROSOFT, Skype is the world’s #1 provider of VoIP services. Two years before making the purchase Microsoft began efforts to patent technology to intercept VoIP calls.

The information can be used in many ways. Criminally speaking, credit card numbers, social security numbers or other personally identifying information can be easily procured. Information and keywords gathered from phone calls can be used in legal proceedings. Data-mining techniques can be used to gear advertisments and marketing based on conversations that you think are private.

Even more alarming is the fact that once Skype is downloaded on your computer, it is possible to turn on your webcam from a remote location. That’s right. You might be sitting there reading the latest blog from your favorite afghan-knitting granny and somebody, somewhere, might be looking back at you.

You owe it to yourself and your personal security to learn as much as you can about how your computer, your home and even your thoughts, if you are careless enough to type them in somewhere, can be accessed.

FUSION CENTERS

Finally, know that fusion centers really do exist and they are the final clearinghouse for all of this information. Sometimes loosely cloaked as “marketing research” facilities, they have systems for corralling the information gleaned from your computer usage that will provide a very complete profile of you. That profile may contain information about your relationships, your sexual orientation and fantasies, your political ideologies, your religious beliefs, your family, your friends, your bank accounts, where your money comes from, photo recognition profiles….absolutely everything there is to know about you.

The fusion centers are the real threat – if personal freedoms continue to erode at the current rate, you may one day be deemed an enemy of the state based on your Facebook status updates. Information compiled there could, potentially, make you a target of the government.

Personally, I have no intention of ceasing my usage of the internet. The internet and the continuous access to knowledge make this a great time to be alive. I will continue to do my research, I’ll continue to share my opinions and information. But I will do these things knowing that nothing is private anymore.

Big Brother is not just watching – he’s making a scrapbook.


Hyperlinks in original article:
http://www.infowars.com/what-if-someone-could-see-everything-youve-ever-googled/
 
WTF do you mean "what if"? how can you be so naive to think that wasn't already the case? you seriously think people can be googling crime tips and child porn without leaving traces for investigation, if law enforcement asks?
 
WTF do you mean "what if"? how can you be so naive to think that wasn't already the case? you seriously think people can be googling crime tips and child porn without leaving traces for investigation, if law enforcement asks?

Wait, did you read the article?
 
Danke has some explaining to do. his scrapbook is full of pictures of fat people and women who can't park.
 
I keep hoping that The Super-Wide Area Network gets up and running. So far... just hope.

Pardon my ignorance, but can you summarize the benefits of Swansat from - what I assumed was - the google/privacy perspective?

From the Swansat pages:
Instead of receiving a series of monthly bills totaling more than USD$215 for all of these services listed above, the user will only pay about 50% of that amount (about USD$100 per month).

http://swansat.com/overview_1.htm

Since my AT&T fiber bill (lowest package - but more than enough to stream without issue), is about $20 per month. So it interests me little to go to $100/month. Granted, if this covered my company-provided cellphone too, I could see how the numbers start to add up. That said, they don't seem more than just another ISP. The lag might suck for gamers (minimum one-quarter second for the up-down trip to a geostationary satellite). My ping to google is 9 ms and I could see a result of 259 ms as annoying.

This would still be great if you have nothing or pay too much - more competition is good. I just don't see how Swansat connects here...
 
Companies have been doing this for a very long time. Have you ever wondered why you see an advertisement which matches something you have searched for or a similar product or service which you have recently purchased? Companies use demographics, spending habits, searches... in order to match products and/or services with you in hopes that you buy their product or service. So too, this information could be sold to pretty much anyone....
 
Pardon my ignorance, but can you summarize the benefits of Swansat from - what I assumed was - the google/privacy perspective?

From the Swansat pages:


Since my AT&T fiber bill (lowest package - but more than enough to stream without issue), is about $20 per month. So it interests me little to go to $100/month. Granted, if this covered my company-provided cellphone too, I could see how the numbers start to add up. That said, they don't seem more than just another ISP. The lag might suck for gamers (minimum one-quarter second for the up-down trip to a geostationary satellite). My ping to google is 9 ms and I could see a result of 259 ms as annoying.

This would still be great if you have nothing or pay too much - more competition is good. I just don't see how Swansat connects here...
I don't use SWANset yet so I don't know much about them. I just found them on the Internet and thought it looked interesting because of the privacy issue. I think they would be less expensive for most people when you add it all up.
If your basic residential phone service costs about USD$30 per month,
and if you have a second dedicated fax line costing about USD$15 per month,
and if you have cellular service costing about USD$50 per month (with long distance charges included),
and if you have high speed DSL internet access costing about USD$50 per month,
and if you subscribe to about 100 cable or DBS satellite channels costing about USD$70 per month,
and if you subscribe to a satellite-delivered digital audio service costing about USD$10 per month,
then your total information utility bill is currently running no less than USD$225 per month.

SWANsat™ will deliver all of these services for only about USD$100.00—and maybe for less than that!
 
In the Casey Anthony case, the police were easily able to see the searches for chloroform. It's already being done. Google needs to be taken down a notch or two. Isn't there a better search engine that is private anyway??
 
Back
Top