Wash Times wrong on Dr. Paul

[Bradley in DC]

Laddies and gentlemen, start your keyboards!

Today's conservative Washington Times newspaper (well read among Republicans in DC), "Though not on stage, Bush is at center of GOP debate"
by Stephen Dinansays this about the debate last night:

"All who were asked said they would consider the option of using tactical nuclear weapons to stop Iran from gaining a nuclear weapon" which might be technically true, but it certainly gives the wrong impression as Dr. Paul clearly stated his opposition in his response to the most important moral issue of our time question.

His only mention, "Also participating were former Govs. Mike Huckabee of Arkansas, Tommy G. Thompson of Wisconsin and James S. Gilmore III of Virginia and Rep. Ron Paul of Texas."

A flood of POLITE AND RESPECTFUL corrections might be in order...

 

[Therion]

Don't bother. This is Washington Times, not Washington Post.

 

[RationalActivist]

I would agree. Living in the Washington DC area myself I can tell you while the Washington Times is read by a fair amount of people the Washington Post is the more popular paper - even if it is more liberal.

 

[BuddyRey]

You can trust the Moonie Times about as far as you can throw it. It is, without a doubt, the least credible, most biased rag on the East Coast. Even the New York Post isn't as bad, and that's really saying something!