WaPo Slams ‘Diet Culture,’ Calls to Help Kids Resist ‘Anti-Fat Expectations’

Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
117,537
WaPo Slams ‘Diet Culture,’ Calls to Help Kids Resist ‘Anti-Fat Expectations’

I'm a fat guy, and yet I find this Marxist horseshit as appalling as the queeer grooming.

Helicopter Karens will triple mask, scrub down Jr's room with industrial strength anti-bacterials, will scour the earth for whole earth, macrobiotic, fair trade oatmeal, but then embrace this nonsense after following government food guidelines that made Jr a porker.

And we wonder why life expectancy is falling...


WaPo Slams ‘Diet Culture,’ Calls to Help Kids Resist ‘Anti-Fat Expectations’

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media...ls-to-help-kids-resist-anti-fat-expectations/

JOSHUA KLEIN 28 Apr 2023

The time has come to “cancel diet culture,” according to a Washington Post essay that calls to help children “resist” conforming to “anti-fat expectations,” and whose author expresses regret over not having challenged her doctor’s recommendation she lose weight.

The article, by contributing columnist Kate Cohen, entitled “It’s time to cancel diet culture — if not for ourselves, for our kids,” begins by blaming “American diet culture” for establishing a deep-rooted bias surrounding obesity.

“American diet culture teaches us at an early age that fat is bad and thin is good. Fat is ugly and thin is pretty. Fat is unhealthy and thin is healthy. Fat is irresponsible and thin is virtuous,” the author writes.

“This cultural bias is so pervasive and insidious that it turns almost everyone into either victim or collaborator. Or, if you’re like me, into both,” she adds.

Cohen cites author Virginia Sole-Smith, who explores “the toll that weight stigma takes on children” and the tools parents can use “to fight back,” as well as the “near-constant barrage of abuse and discrimination fat people face — in addition to the physical challenges of navigating a world designed for smaller bodies.”

Sole-Smith argues, Cohen writes, that fat children are “underestimated” by their teachers, “Black adolescents in bigger bodies are disproportionately punished for dress code violations,” and doctors “often have trouble seeing beyond a patient’s weight and reflexively prescribe dieting, regardless of the well-documented odds against permanent weight loss.”

According to Cohen, Sole-Smith’s new book Fat Talk also “questions the received narrative of the ‘obesity epidemic’” while tracing a “far more complicated relationship between health, weight, diet, disease and mortality.”

The book also argues that “whatever health risks might come from living in a fat body are compounded, not lessened, by anti-fat messaging.”

Cohen then goes on to berate herself over her own “complicity” in diet culture, as she notes how Sole-Smith demonstrates “how easily everyone, especially parents, can go from being victims of diet culture to being its enforcers” — something she personally admits to having done:

When my own child’s body changed from “slim” to “husky,” I didn’t tell him to diet, but I know I radiated concern and an eagerness to help him lose weight. At the time, I would have said I simply wanted him to flourish in a fatphobic world where people get more goodies if they’re thin. But even if that were true, even if my own anti-fat bias had nothing to do with it, I should have behaved differently.

She, again, cites Sole-Smith’s book, which argues that “instead of urging children to conform to anti-fat expectations, parents could help them identify, critique and resist them.”

“I should have told my son to trust his body, not suggest casually that he might enjoy yoga,” Cohen writes.

She concludes that though she sees the importance in the message of being comfortable with one’s own body, she need not believe it for herself:

What I decided when I read “Fat Talk,” though, is that I don’t have to believe it for myself. I have to believe it for children whose teachers assume they are dumber because they are heavier. For Black girls who are punished because their bodies don’t conform to White body standards. For the women who avoid the doctor because they failed to obey the one impossible doctor’s order: lose weight.

“I can’t stop being a victim of diet culture. But I can stop being a collaborator,” she adds.

The Post columnist then expresses her aspiration to henceforth remain silent on such issues.

“I can, first of all, shut up — about diets, about ‘guilty pleasures,’ about resolutions to eat ‘healthier,’ about any body’s weight,” she writes. “Whatever toxic notions I hold about food and weight I can at least keep from spilling out.”

However, she notes, Sole-Smith insists that silence, too, is harmful.

“Saying nothing isn’t enough,” she writes, “because the rest of the world talks about bodies so loudly, all the time.”

Cohen ends her piece by describing the regret she feels for not challenging her physician, who once recommended she lose weight.

“A few years ago, at my physical, I ventured to say, ‘I think this is just what I weigh, and it’s okay.’ I was trying so hard to believe that. My doctor replied, ‘You could stand to lose 10 pounds.’ And I didn’t argue,” she writes.

“One day, though — not for my sake but for the sake of some future patient — I might just muster the courage to ask: ‘What for?’” she concludes.

In response, some took to social media to ridicule the essay.

“‘Diet culture collaborators,’” wrote one user, “[meaning] People who encourage others to eat healthier.”

“Heaven forfend,” the user added.

“Yes, because diabetes is awesome!” another mocked.

“The WaPo is a laughingstock,” one Twitter user wrote.

The issue comes as obesity continues to be encouraged by many on the left and in the entertainment industry, despite it being a condition that puts people at an increased risk of severe illness, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

In December, a Scientific American essay claimed the fight against obesity is rooted in “racism,” and the prescribing of “weight loss” has “long since proved to be ineffective.”

https://twitter.com/sciam/status/1608091753634058242



Meanwhile, a TIME Magazine piece claimed early 20th century pushes for exercise in the U.S. stemmed from “white supremacy” in order to produce “more white babies,” while alleging it is wrong to presume that fat people are “not fit” or that they “want to lose weight.”

In October, entertainment giant Disney unveiled its first “plus-sized” heroine in a short film about an oversized ballet dancer dealing with “body dysmorphia.”

In October, entertainment giant Disney unveiled its first “plus-sized” heroine in a short film about an oversized ballet dancer dealing with “body dysmorphia.”

https://twitter.com/MailOnline/status/1585560710289018882



The obese ballet dancer in the film marks the first time an overweight character is treated as the hero instead of as comic relief or a villain.

In September, the Los Angeles Unified School District reportedly shared a “woke” video stating it was wrong to deem junk food bad while promoting a new concept of “food neutrality,” claiming “diet culture is based on oppression.”

Last January, SELF magazine published a column claiming that “anti-fatness” and “fatphobia” restrict the accessibility of fitness endeavors for fat people.
 
It's not ok. The children are morbidly obese, are going to have a lifetime of health issues and die an early death because parents don't want to offend their snowflakes.
 

[MENTION=3169]Anti Federalist[/MENTION]

Well....wait for body integrity dysphoria to become a thing.

 
Well....wait for body integrity dysphoria to become a thing.

It has...that's been a recognized form of mental illness for years now.

The difference is that, at least up to now, no sane, ethical or legitimate surgeon would perform amputation on healthy limbs to satisfy a mental illness.

But all of sudden, amputating and mutilating perfectly healthy genital organs, on minor children, without parental consent or knowledge is now A-OK.
 
Last edited:
They are going after your thoughts, personal opinions, and desires.
The majority of the country is obese.
The thin fit crowd do not care if you are obese they only care about their own health and diet they choose to eat. They are content to leave fat people alone.

Who is doing the fat shaming? Nobody.
Since fat people have to look at thin, fit, muscular people, they are outraged.

Maybe soon children with a lower BMI will be mandated to become obese.

It doesn't take a medical degree to witness an obese person huffing and puffing, and sweating after taking a few walking steps.

Imagine a petite person and their frame that gets obese. They use to be 30 inches at the shoulders and now are 70. It defies any logic or reason to think that literally pushing your body apart is healthy.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. If you think a 500 pound woman is beautiful, there are plenty of them to choose from. Just make sure you bring them their food to their bed side table on time.

Seems that physical education in schools should be abolished or majorly transformed. To my knowledge PE is all about activity and exercise. That teaching needs to get ousted ASAP.
 
Parents of obese children should be prosecuted for child abuse. Parents are the ones doing the shopping and teaching the kids eating habits. Child obesity should be a crime. It is not enough to abuse their body and make them fat forever they now have to go after their mind and try to convince them that fat is good.

Let the fat care for the fat.
[MENTION=3169]Anti Federalist[/MENTION] there is a guy on youtube Dr. Berg with over 2500 videos about ketogenic diet. Getting nutrients from your delicious food. Get you body into fat burning mode and the weight just disappears while never being hungry.
 
It has...that's been a recognized form of mental illness for years now.

The difference is that, at least up to now, no sane, ethical or legitimate surgeon would perform amputation on healthy limbs to satisfy a mental illness.

But all of sudden, amputating and mutilating perfectly healthy genital organs, on minor children, without parental consent or knowledge is now A-OK.

I don't just mean the classification as a mental illness, but the social contagion aspect of it.

That said...we are indeed there...

https://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/transgendered-transabled-people-choosing-identify-handicapped
From transgendered to 'transabled': Now people are 'choosing' to identify as handicapped
Some with 'body integrity identity disorder' even desire amputation or other impairments — experts weigh in

Deirdre ReillyBy Deirdre Reilly | Fox News

A troubling societal issue called "transableism" is attracting attention these days.

Transableism is a newer term for BIID, or "Body Integrity Identity Disorder," in which a person actually "identifies" as handicapped.

BIID has been relabeled to transableism to align with today's trans community, according to some.

The point of "changing the identifier" from a psychiatric condition (BIID) to an advocacy term (transableism) is to "harness the stunning cultural power of gender ideology" to the cause of allowing doctors to "treat" BIID patients by "amputating healthy limbs, snipping spinal cords or destroying eyesight," according to Evolution News and Science Today (EN), which reports on and analyzes evolution, neuroscience, bioethics, intelligent design and other science-related issues.

Culturally, transableism is "the next abyss," that site also notes.

In one case, a woman in her 50s in Oslo, Norway, identifies as disabled and uses a wheelchair, although she has no physical handicap. (iStock)

Why?

Because "some of these persons mutilate themselves; others ask surgeons for an amputation or for the transection of their spinal cord," that site adds of the shocking steps some are taking.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) notes on its website, "Those with BIID desire the amputation of one or more healthy limbs or desire a paralysis."

A North Carolina college student called transableism a "cry for attention."

The 24-year-old told Fox News Digital, "It’s offensive to people who actually suffer from the condition that you say you need, in order to be your true self."


"It’s offensive to people who actually suffer from the condition."

He went on, "It’s embarrassing, and I don’t know if you can be considered a serious human being if you alter your body like this, instead of getting the appropriate mental help you need."

In one case of BIID, Jørund Viktoria Alme, 53, a senior credit analyst in Oslo, Norway, identifies as disabled and uses a wheelchair, even though she has no physical handicap.

Alme is also transgender, according to Heraldscotland.com. Alme said on the morning TV program "Good Morning Norway" in 2022 that it had been a "lifelong wish" to have been born "a woman paralyzed from the waist down," the same source noted.

One woman in her 20s (not pictured) identified as blind but wasn't — and even took steps to try to destroy her own eyesight, according to multiple reports. (iStock)

In an even more shocking case, a 21-year-old North Carolina woman who identified as blind actually took steps to destroy her own eyesight, according to multiple reports from a few years ago.


One Arizona internist called today's transableism a "delusional disorder."

"In my opinion, both transgender and transabled persons suffer from a delusional disorder," Jane Orient, a general internist in Tucson, Arizona, and executive director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, told Fox News Digital via email.

"The Oath of Hippocrates adjures physicians to do no harm," Orient said.

"Mutilating the body is an objective harm even if makes the patient subjectively feel better," she added.

"Those with BIID desire the amputation of one or more healthy limbs or desire a paralysis," notes the website of the NIH. (iStock)

"The disability is lifelong and imposes burdens on others — and neither patients nor physicians can duck responsibility for that."

Orient also noted, "With transgenders the follow-up is generally very short — not sure about the [follow-up with] elective amputees," she said.

"The ‘no other way’ [to cope with the condition] excuse is a cop out; we need to find other ways," she also said. "Denial of reality is anti-scientific."

Dr. Marc Siegel, a clinical professor of medicine and a practicing internist at NYU Langone Medical Center in New York City — as well as a Fox News medical contributor — told Fox News Digital via email that most doctors will "only perform procedures they feel are medically indicated."

Siegel referred to Munchausen syndrome, which is a "factitious disorder" in which a person "repeatedly and deliberately acts as if they have a physical or mental illness" when they are not really sick, according to WebMd.com.

Dr. Siegel continued, "We deal with Munchausen and Munchausen by proxy, where patients can be quite convincing about illnesses they don't really have — and we need to be on the lookout for this."

"Today, I feel like people would [even] encourage mutilation for ‘transabled’ people, in order to be thought of as an ‘ally.’" (iStock)

Calling cosmetic plastic surgery procedures a "gray area," Siegel noted that "as an internist who clears people for all kind of surgeries, I find myself in lengthy discussions with patients about whether they really need a face lift, tummy tuck, etc."

He added about "transableism," "I would never clear anyone for surgery to remove a limb that does not need removal."

The North Carolina college student also said about today's trend of transableism, "Today, I feel like people would [even] encourage mutilation for ‘transabled’ people, in order to be thought of as an ‘ally.’"​
 
Back
Top