vote ron paul in times top 100 influential list

Umm, the girl that plays Hermione in Harry Potter is only 11 spots behind Paul. Who, exactly, is she influencing?
 
I voted, but this is a stupid list. Ex:

1 - Lady Gaga
2 - Kim Yu-Na
3 - Jeff Bridges
8 - Sandra Bullock
15 - Scott Brown
16 - Nicole "Snooki" Polizzi

I could go on but why waste my time
 
I swear this is true.

When I just voted for Ron Paul, the captcha thing underneath said "The Loony."
 
I guess the Obamas, Hillary Clinton, and Nancy Pelosi made the top 10 because they were the most influential in a negative way?
 
I voted, but this is a stupid list. Ex:

1 - Lady Gaga
2 - Kim Yu-Na
3 - Jeff Bridges
8 - Sandra Bullock
15 - Scott Brown
16 - Nicole "Snooki" Polizzi

I could go on but why waste my time

I think they just opened it up for voting today, the list is going to change a lot over the days. Dana White was number 1 this morning. keep voting guys, make it go viral, spread it around on all your social netwroking sites.


LETS MAKE RON PAUL NUMBER 1 BEEEOOOOOTTTTCCCCHHHHEEESSSSS!!!!!
 
lady gaga??!! are you fucking kidding?!


all I have to say is fuck everyone who voted for her.
 
http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1972075_1972078_1972290,00.html

got to slide the bar over and do a captcha

currently ranked 74 lets get the man to the top

I do not believe those numbers are supposed to represent "rank".

Unless I'm wrong, THIS list seems to be the ranked list (if this crazy link works)

http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1972075_1976159_1976160,00.html

As of this time he is ranked 49. The algorithm seems to take into account both how high a person rates AND how many people vote for the person. So, for example Ron is ahead of Betty White, even though she has a higher rating than him (92-82) because he has more voters (26-23). But Arnold S. is ahead of Paul because he has more voters (32) even though he only has a rating of 70.

So it actually seems to be MORE based on number of voters than how high the ratings are, though it's based on both and there are some exceptions. So let's get him lots of voters! :-)
 
Personally, I'm just fine with Paul NOT appearing in this globalist/socialist propaganda rag.

(I voted for the hell of it, though.)
 
Desperation at it's height. Time's time has come to an end.

I would not vote in that stupid poll on a cold day in Hell.

They can't tell about all the corruption going on, but waste time on a poll that has nothing to do with all the problems going on right now. SHAME ON YOU TIME. MAGAZINE that I will never ever buy your rag again.

Think about the insult to everyone in just putting this stupid poll in print. I am sure we will see more shortly.
 
Back
Top