[Video] Sen. Rand Paul reacts to Mitch McConnell's win

The theme of the new Congress is going to be "getting things done."

The Republicans are going to be passing bills regularly and sending them to the President.

Some things will get vetoed, but I expect quite a bit of legislating will actually get done.

...nothing mindblowing from our point of view, but some marginal improvements and in stark contrast to the stalemate since 2010.

Rand, by virtue of the position he's masterfully worked himself into, is going to be a big part of that.

So, what does this mean for Rand? It means he's going to be able to build a resume of legislative accomplishment on which he can run in 2016.
 
The theme of the new Congress is going to be "getting things done."

...

...nothing mindblowing from our point of view, but some marginal improvements and in stark contrast to the stalemate since 2010.

Doing anything is the problem. We want them doing less and leaving us alone.
 
The Republicans are going to be passing bills regularly and sending them to the President.

I don't see why the Democrats will vote for cloture on anything. They will want to avoid making Obama sign vetoes, thereby making himself look like the Obstructor-In-Chief.
 
I don't see why the Democrats will vote for cloture on anything. They will want to avoid making Obama sign vetoes, thereby making himself look like the Obstructor-In-Chief.

The Republicans will have 54 seats in the Senate, so they only need 6 Dems to get cloture. That should be very doable on a number of bills, which have broad bipartisan support (but were not supported by his Lameness and were consequently blocked by Harry Rex in order to prevent his Lameness from having to deign to actually veto them) - e.g. Keystone and coal regulations. And then there are some things they can do on simple majority. In general, the relationship between the President and Congressional Democrats should be very different now than it was before this blow out election. They're not going to carry water for him anymore. Politicians are mostly interested in self-preservation and tonight's results will make it plain to Congressional Democrats that they need to distance themselves from Obama to survive 2016.
 
The Republicans will have 54 seats in the Senate, so they only need 6 Dems to get cloture. That should be very doable on a number of bills, which have broad bipartisan support (but were not supported by his Lameness and were consequently blocked by Harry Rex in order to prevent his Lameness from having to deign to actually veto them) - e.g. Keystone and coal regulations. And then there are some things they can do on simple majority. In general, the relationship between the President and Congressional Democrats should be very different now than it was before this blow out election. They're not going to carry water for him anymore. Politicians are mostly interested in self-preservation and tonight's results will make it plain to Congressional Democrats that they need to distance themselves from Obama to survive 2016.

All excellent points.
 
In fact, Rand will be SO well positioned in the Senate, I almost think he shouldn't run for president! Now instead of risking a single senate seat to take a chance on the presidency, he's risking a very powerful and influential senate seat which has a healthy coalition built up around it.

Focus on passing structural reforms in the Senate for a while, let the house of cards collapse on someone else so that your ideas don't get the blame. Then ride in on your white horse! It couldn't be more perfect! Let 2016 go.
 
The Republican mandate, if there is one, will vanish quickly. There are several issues where they could possibly get something passed, but each one comes with their own problems.

Immigration? Everyone wants something done, but no one wants to do anything. No matter what changes you make that Obama might sign, there will be someone who will label it as "amnesty". So if they move here, it will have to be a bill that they know the President won't sign. But in order for Obama to get the blame, they have to do it fast! Right now, their approval numbers are about equal. A Presidential veto of an unpopular bill could resurrect Obama's numbers which will hurt the Republicans.

Audit the Fed? We have to be realistic here. The only way this will ever come to the floor is if they are assured there are enough votes to stop it. (Or if it's watered down such that it is not a true audit) If they bring this up, it opens up anyone who votes against it for a primary challenge. And since they'll need at least some Republicans to vote against it, there will be pressure not to hurt their incumbents.

I can definitely see them moving on Keystone and I bet Obama signs it. This will give them both a small boost and will take the issue off the table. Unfortunately, having that issue on the table has helped the GOP. But if they get credit for resolving it, it could help them. There are other energy-related proposals that could do the same thing. I wouldn't expect too many of them to actually have economic impacts ahead of 2016, though, so very little credit will be given for improving things.

I would love for them to bring up Rand's REDEEM act and his Repatriation bill. Both of those things could actually get signed by Obama. However, there will be pushback from the establishment. The Tax Repatriation Bill could actually have immediate positive economic impacts. The problem is that if the economy is improving, the President will likely take credit. Bill Clinton employed this strategy after getting his ass handed to him in '94. The REDEEM Act would put many of Rand's own party in an uncomfortable position. They'll see it as slicing their own throats by restoring rights to ex-convicts. In some states, that will allow them to get their voting rights back. Even though it's a small number, the fear is that it could result in more democratic voters and other expanded benefits.

They could also try health care. Now, these are sure to be vetoed, but it will continue the fight into 2016. The fight has been helpful to Republicans, though, so they might push it.

Unfortunately, Obama is kind of in the driver's seat. He has options, too.
Push his executive over reach. This will cause combativeness. The GOP could get caught up in investigations and hearings. Then, the dems can run on the fact that the GOP was too busy playing partisan games than actually trying to get things done.

He could use his veto pen and the media to prevent any new legislation from being passed and painting himself as the savior from bad GOP policies.

He could go Bill Clinton and co-opt any economic changes the GOP passes. This could help his legacy and could help Hillary. I tend to think he'd like to do the former, but not the latter.


Anyway, should be an interesting couple of months to see which way the winds are blowing.
 
The REDEEM Act would put many of Rand's own party in an uncomfortable position. They'll see it as slicing their own throats by restoring rights to ex-convicts. In some states, that will allow them to get their voting rights back. Even though it's a small number, the fear is that it could result in more democratic voters and other expanded benefits.

If this was executed properly it could redeem the republican brand in time for 2016 in one move. Instead of having their throats cut, members would have to tout their vote for it and proclaim how the GOP is finally helping blacks now that Democrats are unable to stop them.

The should just pass civil rights stuff, things that undercut the DNC, like crazy and "prove" that the DNC was keeping blacks in chains.

Hillary could never top that. DNC wouldn't win an election for a decade.
 
In fact, Rand will be SO well positioned in the Senate, I almost think he shouldn't run for president! Now instead of risking a single senate seat to take a chance on the presidency, he's risking a very powerful and influential senate seat which has a healthy coalition built up around it.

Focus on passing structural reforms in the Senate for a while, let the house of cards collapse on someone else so that your ideas don't get the blame. Then ride in on your white horse! It couldn't be more perfect! Let 2016 go.

He'll run for both positions so if he loses the presidency he'll just keep his senate seat.
 
Rand Paul: "...I don't think our policies are bad. I like the Republican Party. I'm a Republican...."

:eek:

Speaking of 'obtuse'..You'd have to be real obtuse to not see the double and quadruple-talking going on here!
 
last week, Dr. Ron Paul's grand-daughter was married to an aide to the GOP's Minority Leader in the Senate.
You young ones here are sugar'd out on your Halloween candy. Thanksgiving looms, and an exciting string
of conversations around a vast and ample dinner table. Right now, young Jesse Benton has an upgrade in
his job title that goes along with a doubling or tripling of personal responsibility. The New Year looms for all!
 
If this was executed properly it could redeem the republican brand in time for 2016 in one move. Instead of having their throats cut, members would have to tout their vote for it and proclaim how the GOP is finally helping blacks now that Democrats are unable to stop them.

The should just pass civil rights stuff, things that undercut the DNC, like crazy and "prove" that the DNC was keeping blacks in chains.

Hillary could never top that. DNC wouldn't win an election for a decade.
"Properly executed" is the key phrase. Do you really think that there's any way humanly possible that if Obama signed this piece of legislation that he wouldn't get credit for it?! Even if it was passed by all GOP votes and every other democrat voted against it (something that would never happen), Obama would still come out of it as the President who restored rights to a generation of non-violent offenders.
 
"Properly executed" is the key phrase. Do you really think that there's any way humanly possible that if Obama signed this piece of legislation that he wouldn't get credit for it?! Even if it was passed by all GOP votes and every other democrat voted against it (something that would never happen), Obama would still come out of it as the President who restored rights to a generation of non-violent offenders.

Worth it.
 
Rand Paul: "...I don't think our policies are bad. I like the Republican Party. I'm a Republican...."

:eek:

Speaking of 'obtuse'..You'd have to be real obtuse to not see the double and quadruple-talking going on here!

Of course he's double-talking. I think most of us realize this. I'm not convinced that Rand Paul is a candidate that can bring liberty back to this country. I am just convinced that the other candidates won't. In other words, I'm hoping for the best.
 
FF writes: I'm not convinced that Rand Paul is a candidate that can bring liberty back to this country.

:confused::confused:

(have we ever had 'liberty'??...i don't think so...quit looking back to chattel slavery, monetary slavery, war draft slavery, suppression of women, etc. ad nauseam as 'the good old days!'...more like 'the good old daze'...

..Btw, for one hideous example, to my knowledge Rand Paul has never uttered a stinking peep in condemnation of banksters acquiring 'our' bonds for nothing...(that's right, your broker bids for them with your hard-earned 401-k money, but the banksters get them for nothing, Rand cheerleaders!...see Bill Still, Ellen Brown, Brother Nathaniel, Byron Dale, etc.)...what suckers to believe in a stinking Republicrat who's winking and stinking his way through the public....like a horny teenage boy, 'Trust me, I'm not like the others"...:rolleyes:...suckers..
 
Last edited:
Back
Top