[Video] Rand Paul on Hannity discusses Benghazi and bill to cut foreign aid

[jct74]

Thursday on 'Hannity'

Tonight a Benghazi victim's mother speaks out about the new e-mails. Plus Sen. Rand Paul on what's next in this investigation. And another look at how the VA neglected our veterans

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/hannity/index.html


update: tube next post below

 

[eduardo89]

Tube:

 

[FriedChicken]

He's also on Hannity radio at 4:35pm.

What time zone, do you know?

 

[eduardo89]

What time zone, do you know?

Pretty sure it's EST since Hannity lives in NY.

 

[francisco]

Hope Rand takes it to Hillary good and hard

 

[JK/SEA]

Hope Rand takes it to Hillary good and hard

what?

 

[jct74]

Here's the Hannity mp3 audio, starts at 21:10. Talks about Benghazi mostly and bill to cut foreign aid at the end.

http://www.premiereinteractive.com/...Hour 2.mp3&site=hannity&type=download&clips=1

 

[jct74]

oops, I forgot to bump this. was he on yet?

 

[francisco]

oops, I forgot to bump this. was he on yet?

Rand did good. He looked appropriately and justifiably annoyed. Supported McCain's call on floor of Senate today, for a bipartisan joint House of Reps / Senate Select Committee to investigate.

Also discussed his proposed common-sense legislation to cut off foreign aid to PA and that Democrats voted against adopting that measure by unanimous consent.

 

[milgram]

 

[eduardo89]

bump:

 

[anaconda]

Here's the Hannity mp3 audio, starts at 21:10. Talks about Benghazi mostly and bill to cut foreign aid at the end.

http://www.premiereinteractive.com/...Hour 2.mp3&site=hannity&type=download&clips=1

LOL Big yawn from Rand very audible on mic from 22:30 to 22:34

 

[anaconda]

Radio show:

25:22 We still use DC-3s? Awesome. What an aircraft!

UPDATE: 25:36 Rand may have misspoken. Here he seems to refer to it as a C-130.

 

[anaconda]

Anyone know why AIPAC has come out against Rand's bill? I'm assuming it "doesn't go far enough?"

UPDATE: The reason is because the funding to the Palestinian Authority includes money for P.A. "security forces" that cooperate with Israel. So AIPAC thinks this would hurt Israel. On the other hand, why can't Israel spring for this expense? Even if it meant giving Israel a little extra money to cover this?