Typical Democrat President post New Deal – LBJ
This is the fourth in a series of posts. The first three can be found here:
Were All Men Really Created Equal
Equality vs. Inequality
America: A Republic or a Third World Democracy?
Note: You can refer to the Legend section for definitions of the abbreviations used in this write-up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To reduce burden on the reader I am heavily reducing info about LBJ’s political life and characteristics. He is not especially evil but just a typical welfare statist; that does not make GOP war-mongerers saints by comparison; both are typical products of democracy, which is the main villain. Details, references, quotes etc are in Spencer’s original write-up. Despite the above reduction, the issue being complex and Spencer’s ideas being novel, the OP is long by normal standards.
LBJ’s main characteristics: Exceptional power lust; possible fraud, cheating etc; plutocracy, easily manipulating and using people to climb up.
Major failure as President: prolonged Vietnam war, too many American boys killed.
Despite an unimpressive record and Vietnam failure, many Americans are favorably disposed towards him. Reason: Welfare State supported by the Democratic Party. LBJ Designed the “Great Society” legislation that included laws that upheld civil rights, Public Broadcasting, Medicare, Medicaid, environmental protection, aid to education, and his “War on Poverty.” How all these failed policies continue to destroy America even today is explained by Spencer – I am being brief because most readers here are against the Welfare State. But now comes the difference between Spencer and all other critics of democracy and the welfare state – so I will quote directly from his blog:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
…Still let us assume his “domestic policies” to be the basis of his “greatness”. Yet the most important detail about it was neither explained in that Wiki article, nor most people bother to consider – from where did he bring the huge funds for his nation-wide charity? Why, he was the Prez, the whole country was at his disposal – the producers had to contribute! All he had to do was give – they had to work hard and create so that he could give. Johnson’s alleged greatness consists of a simple trick – take Peter’s money and give it to Paul, and achieve sainthood of charity (plus commission and power). Take money from producers and give it to non-producers. Like his predecessors and spiritual equivalents (FDR etc), he heaped doles on some men, but at the cost of other men by using government’s gun, which means reducing these others to slavery. He merely hid behind the word “society” with the help of slogans of charity and altruism, but in reality he stole from some people and gave to others, and in the meantime also charged a very high fee for his altruism.
I have to elaborate a bit on the above paragraph because an appreciable number of men do not understand ‘cheating via government’, as well as the ultimate evil of undifferentiated charity. The explanation ahead shows the weakness of today’s Christianity, where modification is necessary, etc. Supposing there were 2 men with different incomes, you the reader were middle-class, and there was a poor, unemployed man – it was not clear whether he was unemployed because of misfortune or that he was just a bum. Mr. Johnson was suddenly overwhelmed by pity for the poor man, could not control his tears and the urge to help him. So he simply held you by the collar, drew $2000 out of your wallet, and gave them to the poor man. Now the poor man was overwhelmed by emotion – he blessed him, kissed his hand, even touched his feet, and prayed to the Lord to induct Mr. J into heaven. A Padre standing by the side (see ** Note about Padre ahead) also praised Mr. J, and even gave advice to you to continue donations to the poor. What would you feel about Mr. J and about the entire affair, with the Padre telling you it’s your pious duty to help the poor man? Now widen the scope of Mr. J’s charity. He holds ten men in your neighborhood by the collar, draws $2000 from each one of them, and distributes amongst a few poor men. They react the way the single poor man reacted, chanting “Long Live Mr. J!” All those people including the Padre are smiling. But this time, since the money and efforts are more, Mr. J charges a small fee for his ‘pious work’ – $500 for himself and the rest distributed amongst the poor. What would be the reaction of those from whom money was seized? Perhaps someone would draw out his gun and shoot all those people including the Padre, calling them as thieves, robbers and bastards? In the present example nobody does that. With so many men, Padre, etc applauding him, Mr. J is encouraged to further widen his charity – he thinks of demanding money from thousands of ‘haves’ to be given to ‘our poor brethren’ not only in America but all over the earth. But since many more people would object to him, and their voice also would be strong, he calls them in advance as ‘greedy, selfish, materialist looters of society’ etc. (He actually makes a big speech about ‘sacrifice’ to a huge applause in the local church or town-hall which becomes a famous speech as “Do not ask what your neighbors will do for you, but ask what you will do for them” speech. The following will be obvious to many Americans, but to a few uninitiated of the neo-gen: this speech was on the same lines as LBJ’s brother JFK’s famous speech referred to just ahead). This brings in huge applause to him and stifles all opposition. Since the scope of work has grown significantly, he hires men who are strong and powerful enough to bull-doze any opposition. He names them as Sheriff, Deputy, commissioner etc. Their salaries, as well as Mr. J and his direct assistants’ bigger commission, comes out of the much bigger amount collected from those thousands of men. Then there are much louder shouts of “Long Live Mr. J”, the poor whole-heartedly contribute out of what they got from him to erect a statue of Mr. J, and so on. Now Mr. J comes to the final stage of his endeavor – he demands and collects billions from 100-200 million people, hires huge staff to collect it, hires private contractors and establishes private corporations in his wife’s and other relatives’ names to do part of the work, buys copters and jets out of those billions, makes several trips to different parts of the nation, waves to the poor hapless people, who wave back to him with tears in their eyes. Now his statues are erected at various places in America, and even some poor people elsewhere on earth long to touch his feet and kiss his hand.
Are you shocked? Do you call me as mad? But that is what successive Dem-Presidents have done since the New Deal – only that the agency that supports them in this endeavor is known as ‘the government’! And hardly has anybody, having a large enough voice (by which I mean the GOP, many hi-fi intellectuals etc) raised correct objections to it – they are all under the influence of the Padre, particularly GOP – which is why I have called all those rich Americans and Europeans who have achieved so much as moral cowards! The man who felt like drawing out the gun belongs to one of the minority groups demanding a reasonable government, and if he goes beyond fretting, fuming and vociferous dissent he will be hanged.
Mr. J’s actions would be moral only if the money was his own, or contributed voluntarily by his supporters! Else it is robbery whether done by pointing a gun at a few people or at the entire nation. Note this crucial point: Had it not been for the government’s force, Mr. J would not have been able to achieve a speck of his so-called, alleged, great achievements like charity, society’s welfare etc that he is credited with. He forced them on those unwilling to sacrifice and achieved sainthood, commission and power by looting them. Therefore, sacrifice via government is to be banned.
Comment: Banning the welfare state is a major part of Spencer’s solution; not merely protesting like the Libertarians, Tea Partiers etc but making novel provisions to ban it forever.
Two paragraphs removed from here, the first showing why nobody has felt the pinch or noticed the impact of these actions, the second showing weakness of Christianity against Dems.
Now note one important point over which most of America’s intellectuals defaulted – there is a limit to which Mr. J can go on directly demanding money from the producers (i.e. by means of tax); Limited amount of tax money soon gets consumed, and beyond a particular point of taxation the producers rebel, even illiterate savages who believe in slavery to the tribe, rebel against their chief at some stage, so why would Americans not? When money gets exhausted, the poor, the needy etc too disappear along with their blessings, and more importantly their votes. Then the power, the statues, monuments, everything disappears. So there should be, at least seemingly so, an unlimited source of money to throw at the poor, the way Indian Maharajahs threw (looted) coins out of buckets at beggars running behind their chariots! At this point several lines about paper-money are cut: Many like Adam Smith have written about it, and the Founding Fathers had prescribed death penalty for this crime but their descendants are openly committing it in front of a demoralized nation of previously courageous people! And now there is no control on bail-outs, wars, hand-outs, subsidies – left and right robberies without any controls, qualms and shame! Want 5 billion? Print! What 5 billion too less, want 250 billion? Then print that much, why bother the Prez when he is waving to the masses? Reality is of course waiting around the corner to avenge, only that the appropriate moment arrives when the crash brings in the maximum loss. Based on responses to my earlier writing on the internet I can say that despite the Great Depression, most people have no idea of the meaning of irresponsible paper money in the hands of politicians – talks of austerity aimed at reducing doles is meaningless; not only that war-mongering is today the more expensive part, but the idea of majority opinion determining truth and supporting rulers’ irresponsibility is the ultimate recipe for big-bang collapse – paper money will simply hasten the process!
Despite the dollar-printing factory I can say with full confidence that full-fledged slavery is going on in America – how? Newly printed extra dollars do reduce the value of existing dollars, but imagine the situation that all Americans stop working and merely print more and more dollars to bring in universal prosperity in America! It wouldn’t take more than 1-2 years for the world to discard the toilet paper currency, its value would soon become zero. So even if the value gets reduced, whatever value remains is also because of the people who work as slaves while parasites and their leaders lord over producers. In this context remember Reagan’s irresponsible claim that debts don’t matter: then why did he not give $100 bn to every American so as to enjoy? The entire GOP gang that worships him as hero knows that debts do matter, so they create only as much debt as supports their momentary survival and chest-beating, though they know that in the long run they are finishing off America! Also: GOP’s war-mongering is far more expensive than Dems’ welfare and Reagan’s party is using American boys as cannon fodder to support their political survival; and therefore “Debts don’t matter”! Means: from one side the Dems have reduced honest productive Americans to slaves of parasites; from other side, because of their inability to answer Dems’ onslaught, the GOP is using them as cannon fodder! This show will go on – but only for so long, till another Caesar takes over the American Empire!
As seen in the sub-article ‘Democracy as Fertile Ground for Moral Degeneration’, either a dishonest, or at least mediocre but ambitious man will more be prone to accept the job of gaining votes of ‘have-nots’ by giving doles out of other peoples’ money, while an honest man will not do this – Johnson is one amongst many such men encouraged by democracy – and the dollar printing factory is in their hands!
But all Dem presidents from FDR to today are same, viz. communists (see their party resolution ahead). They shed many tears, felt a lot for the poor – and used society’s (i.e. others’) money for their charity-cum-vested interest. JFK’s famous speech, that 5000 year old cliché, that eternal banality, is also given a special name, the “Do not ask what your country can do for you” speech, as if engraved on stone. Rob the producers and get airport, parks, libraries, museums, colleges, schools, institutions etc named after you; in addition, indulge in sex-scandals and yet achieve sainthood.
Elsewhere in my writing I have explained this phenomenon (charity via government) can be practiced only by saying “Unselfishness? Non-egoism? Of course great ideals, but to be observed by others so that I can get away with my irrationalities, I will gain sainthood, earn commission, grab power” etc. “Go America go – work hard for your fellow brothers, sacrifice for the down-trodden, wipe their eyes, drink their tears, lick their wounds – work hard and sacrifice. I too will be looking after the welfare of maids in hotels and of actresses.”
The above is the exact meaning of “Achieving Sainthood, commission and power by Charity, but at the cost of others”; explanation why this will lead to civil war is given ahead in sub-article Erosion of Reason as Root of Civil War.
Analysis of LBJ’s action is important – If men are talking about collapse of America, saving civilization etc, then it is important to fully understand LBJ! There is nothing great about his “Great Society”, no “War on Poverty” and no love of the masses but only war on productive people for the sake of sainthood, commission and power. There is nothing great about his works, it is just the work of a pick-pocket, done in open daylight – he has used the words society, public, etc. to hide the fact that he is merely looting productive people and transferring their wealth to parasites and in the meantime extracting commission, achieving sainthood and power. (At this point recall a previous sentence: “The reason why civilization fails at this point is that democracy is a fertile ground for ‘moral degeneration’, for increase of immorality in society where only a small, controllable amount of it existed earlier.” This is the root of that huge ‘unbeatable’ DVB (doles vote-block) the Dems have collected to destroy America! This is what the FFs could not secure the Republic against (which means entire mankind has not been able to transcend), while only the Aristotelian atmosphere of FFs’ times allowed them to achieve greatness.)
Elsewhere I have referred to Obama using the Executive Order too frequently (i.e. he is acting as a dictator by suspending the entire democratic process) – and recently the FCC simply ordered the internet service as government’s utilities – he has torpedoed America’s sovereignty on various scores (inviting the UN into America’s internal matters, amnesty to illegal immigrants etc being some examples) – all of it also belongs to the category of FDR–LBJ–JFK’s “greatness”! What is being explained here is the basis of it.
Important Questions about democracy: Observe an important point about the entire above: to achieve power, LBJ has relied on the votes of parasites, the ones to whom he is offering doles out of producers’ efforts – it’s a contract for mutual benefit amongst them – I will promise productive peoples’ money for you, you give me your votes; we will both gain at their cost, by looting them! That brings forth questions about the morality and honesty of the entire democratic process; it evokes the question, to what extent should honest men abide by the “vote” of the majority? Does truth depend on the opinion of the majority, or is truth to be established by objective reference to reality? Are the rights of an individual really “unalienable” or can they be so very easily trampled by the majority? It also again brings into question Jefferson’s “All men were created equal” – as far as I see it here, the productive individuals have easily been reduced to parasites’ slaves with the help of these 2-3 unquestionable beliefs of American people, the ones they think that have raised them far above “old Yorrup”! Wrong interpretation of equality has suddenly become the poison for the honest and the productive! To the extent that a man is honest, conscientious and responsible (i.e. he is good), he will work like a slave – to the extent he is dishonest, irresponsible, malingerer, drifter, parasite, robber (i.e. he is actually evil), he will be the master, the slave-owner! Honesty is the slave of dishonesty; the good is the slave of the evil – and this they call as “All men were created equal”! Now imagine the words “The Welfare State” – what meaning they have in human minds – welfare of whole mankind, general happiness, no sorrow, no pain, no selfishness, no egoism but men living like brothers (as preached by all religions), sharing each other’s burden … and so on. In reality, Welfare State is merely some bloody rogue offering producers’ money to encourage parasitism – it is not merely that he is offering producers’ money to a few parasites, but he is set to totally destroy a productive, individualist society by heavily increasing parasites beyond this point, because there is no need to work but merely vote for him – the actual meaning of welfare state merely reduces to invitation to rogues to destroy a great country / civilization to get their vested interest satisfied! But that has always been the meaning of all theories of unselfishness, non-egoism, self-sacrifice, charity etc – i.e. of communism and of all religions – the welfare state and democracy merely present the alternative as slow-poisoning which floored the mighty Americano! Had somebody proposed communism in the past – or do so even today – all Americans will rise in rebellion – but communism is already in, drop by drop, ml by ml and mm by mm, and they have not been able to do anything! The Founding Fathers had locked religion out of government by means of the wall of separation – now its essence has captured the White House – rulers looting the productive citizenry with the help of parasites! The implication of locking religion out of government is simple but very important: Those who want to practice it honestly (including its ethics of charity) can do so privately the way they want it and to the extent they want it – those who want to practice dishonesty and destroy society from behind it, are forbidden! Unable to answer Dems’ DVB, the Rep-Conzs are destroying America from the other side. Till men do not fully accept that charity via government (i.e. welfare state, doles etc) is the highest evil in human concerns, cheap rogues will keep destroying civilizations using the same. It is not big evil, it is not Satan – to name a few well-known ones from last century, it is not Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Ho Chi Minh – it is just small, mean cowards facilitated by relatively better men’s meanness of not accepting obvious facts. This has now brought me closer to a dilemma – I still consider today’s white Christians and Jews to be enlightened people when I compare them with other religions the world over – but some of the responses about “governmental charity only for those who are really in need” brings to my mind the phrase “Christian-nutters”!
Now as far as the racial angle is concerned: This paragraph is removed from this version because of misunderstanding about race, allegations etc though it gives full proof that both sides have changed stance for votes, but so also Af-Ams have changed their loyalty per benefit, i.e. democracy has taken its toll!
Question of responsibility Overall there is nothing great about America’s fall – no great conspiracy, no danger-diabolic, no Satan at work – just a bunch of cheap small-timers like LBJ have taken the US for a ride! His skill rests on single factor – intellectuals’ inability to explain it properly, their meanness of not allowing it when somebody else is doing it, and productive peoples’ cowardice not to identify it properly. LBJ is of-course an example – the game is thousands of years old, but this is the start of destruction of civilization. And if you give in to this cheapness Americano, you never deserved your inheritance, your legacy.
And finally a caution: Don’t be impatient, don’t draw the gun and kill a few arbitrary people on the street. Instead be adequately aroused that now you have to start action, AND UNITE – but you have to unite in a specific manner explained to some extent by me elsewhere in this book – unite for a specific purpose, viz. to preserve individualism, i.e. preserve the FF-Constitution. ELSE COLLAPSE OF CIVILIZATION RESTS ON YOU, NOT ON LBJ TYPE OF SMALL-TIMERS STRETCHING TO 4000 YEARS BACK.
Throughout mankind’s history, all those who are good at talking about charity, unselfishness etc and pointing at others’ money for their program, have made huge money for themselves and / or fame and publicity and achieved sainthood and power. That is one big racket nobody has busted so far, and the fate of civilization hangs on it…..
…..Now compare these governments (post 1900) with the Founding Fathers’ governments – the FFs were neither ready to use government monies to supply “purified water” to society, nor help a destitute war widow with it. Also compare today’s politicians with the FFs. The FFs were honest as well as sufficiently magnanimous. Some of them were poor (being upright farmers), and though they denied government money to the war widow, they pooled their personal money to help her! (The previously referred to web-site GOP anti-doles[4] titled Is Welfare Unconstitutional says that the man Davy Crockett who opposed government money to the widow was the poorest man in Congress but donated the most to her out of his personal money!) Today, many like LBJ are the opposite – millions of Peters’ money to millions of Pauls, and millions of commission to me, a small fee for my services, he, he, he, he! I kiss babies prior to elections and maids after the elections and shed tears for the poor Mexican children, he, he, he, he! (Remember: All of this is Democracy as Fertile Ground for Moral degeneration!) If Americans allow so very cheap a game to destroy their country – climax of rational man’s aspirations for civilization as I have called it in ASP-R – then they are to be blamed for it, not cheap, mediocre and dishonest politicians and bureaucrats. The unfortunate part is that many of the present shameless generations will have enjoyed during the phase of destruction, while leaving the effects of destruction (the debt) for the future generations to face! (Moral degeneration has spread amongst them too a lot.)
The crucial point of difference is using government for charity – its not charity itself, but using government for charity and achieving sainthood, commission and power at the cost of others. (Remaining paragraph is presently cut from this version).
But do not jump to wrong conclusions – Republicans are more expensive than the Dems, but method is different, war-mongering and plutocracy of bail-outs.
Comment: Since this OP has become too long, I urge readers to see rest of the material (mainly doings of Republican-Conservatives) on Spencer’s website https://americanemesis.wordpress.com.
Remember that unlike other critics of democracy Spencer has achieved novel solution to the problems of democracy, welfare state, war-mongering, plutocracy etc. It is a different matter that he has no position in American society, is heroically fighting religious persecution in India. He needs Americans’ support – but equally, they too need him very badly.
This is the fourth in a series of posts. The first three can be found here:
Were All Men Really Created Equal
Equality vs. Inequality
America: A Republic or a Third World Democracy?
Note: You can refer to the Legend section for definitions of the abbreviations used in this write-up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To reduce burden on the reader I am heavily reducing info about LBJ’s political life and characteristics. He is not especially evil but just a typical welfare statist; that does not make GOP war-mongerers saints by comparison; both are typical products of democracy, which is the main villain. Details, references, quotes etc are in Spencer’s original write-up. Despite the above reduction, the issue being complex and Spencer’s ideas being novel, the OP is long by normal standards.
LBJ’s main characteristics: Exceptional power lust; possible fraud, cheating etc; plutocracy, easily manipulating and using people to climb up.
Major failure as President: prolonged Vietnam war, too many American boys killed.
Despite an unimpressive record and Vietnam failure, many Americans are favorably disposed towards him. Reason: Welfare State supported by the Democratic Party. LBJ Designed the “Great Society” legislation that included laws that upheld civil rights, Public Broadcasting, Medicare, Medicaid, environmental protection, aid to education, and his “War on Poverty.” How all these failed policies continue to destroy America even today is explained by Spencer – I am being brief because most readers here are against the Welfare State. But now comes the difference between Spencer and all other critics of democracy and the welfare state – so I will quote directly from his blog:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
…Still let us assume his “domestic policies” to be the basis of his “greatness”. Yet the most important detail about it was neither explained in that Wiki article, nor most people bother to consider – from where did he bring the huge funds for his nation-wide charity? Why, he was the Prez, the whole country was at his disposal – the producers had to contribute! All he had to do was give – they had to work hard and create so that he could give. Johnson’s alleged greatness consists of a simple trick – take Peter’s money and give it to Paul, and achieve sainthood of charity (plus commission and power). Take money from producers and give it to non-producers. Like his predecessors and spiritual equivalents (FDR etc), he heaped doles on some men, but at the cost of other men by using government’s gun, which means reducing these others to slavery. He merely hid behind the word “society” with the help of slogans of charity and altruism, but in reality he stole from some people and gave to others, and in the meantime also charged a very high fee for his altruism.
I have to elaborate a bit on the above paragraph because an appreciable number of men do not understand ‘cheating via government’, as well as the ultimate evil of undifferentiated charity. The explanation ahead shows the weakness of today’s Christianity, where modification is necessary, etc. Supposing there were 2 men with different incomes, you the reader were middle-class, and there was a poor, unemployed man – it was not clear whether he was unemployed because of misfortune or that he was just a bum. Mr. Johnson was suddenly overwhelmed by pity for the poor man, could not control his tears and the urge to help him. So he simply held you by the collar, drew $2000 out of your wallet, and gave them to the poor man. Now the poor man was overwhelmed by emotion – he blessed him, kissed his hand, even touched his feet, and prayed to the Lord to induct Mr. J into heaven. A Padre standing by the side (see ** Note about Padre ahead) also praised Mr. J, and even gave advice to you to continue donations to the poor. What would you feel about Mr. J and about the entire affair, with the Padre telling you it’s your pious duty to help the poor man? Now widen the scope of Mr. J’s charity. He holds ten men in your neighborhood by the collar, draws $2000 from each one of them, and distributes amongst a few poor men. They react the way the single poor man reacted, chanting “Long Live Mr. J!” All those people including the Padre are smiling. But this time, since the money and efforts are more, Mr. J charges a small fee for his ‘pious work’ – $500 for himself and the rest distributed amongst the poor. What would be the reaction of those from whom money was seized? Perhaps someone would draw out his gun and shoot all those people including the Padre, calling them as thieves, robbers and bastards? In the present example nobody does that. With so many men, Padre, etc applauding him, Mr. J is encouraged to further widen his charity – he thinks of demanding money from thousands of ‘haves’ to be given to ‘our poor brethren’ not only in America but all over the earth. But since many more people would object to him, and their voice also would be strong, he calls them in advance as ‘greedy, selfish, materialist looters of society’ etc. (He actually makes a big speech about ‘sacrifice’ to a huge applause in the local church or town-hall which becomes a famous speech as “Do not ask what your neighbors will do for you, but ask what you will do for them” speech. The following will be obvious to many Americans, but to a few uninitiated of the neo-gen: this speech was on the same lines as LBJ’s brother JFK’s famous speech referred to just ahead). This brings in huge applause to him and stifles all opposition. Since the scope of work has grown significantly, he hires men who are strong and powerful enough to bull-doze any opposition. He names them as Sheriff, Deputy, commissioner etc. Their salaries, as well as Mr. J and his direct assistants’ bigger commission, comes out of the much bigger amount collected from those thousands of men. Then there are much louder shouts of “Long Live Mr. J”, the poor whole-heartedly contribute out of what they got from him to erect a statue of Mr. J, and so on. Now Mr. J comes to the final stage of his endeavor – he demands and collects billions from 100-200 million people, hires huge staff to collect it, hires private contractors and establishes private corporations in his wife’s and other relatives’ names to do part of the work, buys copters and jets out of those billions, makes several trips to different parts of the nation, waves to the poor hapless people, who wave back to him with tears in their eyes. Now his statues are erected at various places in America, and even some poor people elsewhere on earth long to touch his feet and kiss his hand.
Are you shocked? Do you call me as mad? But that is what successive Dem-Presidents have done since the New Deal – only that the agency that supports them in this endeavor is known as ‘the government’! And hardly has anybody, having a large enough voice (by which I mean the GOP, many hi-fi intellectuals etc) raised correct objections to it – they are all under the influence of the Padre, particularly GOP – which is why I have called all those rich Americans and Europeans who have achieved so much as moral cowards! The man who felt like drawing out the gun belongs to one of the minority groups demanding a reasonable government, and if he goes beyond fretting, fuming and vociferous dissent he will be hanged.
Mr. J’s actions would be moral only if the money was his own, or contributed voluntarily by his supporters! Else it is robbery whether done by pointing a gun at a few people or at the entire nation. Note this crucial point: Had it not been for the government’s force, Mr. J would not have been able to achieve a speck of his so-called, alleged, great achievements like charity, society’s welfare etc that he is credited with. He forced them on those unwilling to sacrifice and achieved sainthood, commission and power by looting them. Therefore, sacrifice via government is to be banned.
Comment: Banning the welfare state is a major part of Spencer’s solution; not merely protesting like the Libertarians, Tea Partiers etc but making novel provisions to ban it forever.
Two paragraphs removed from here, the first showing why nobody has felt the pinch or noticed the impact of these actions, the second showing weakness of Christianity against Dems.
Now note one important point over which most of America’s intellectuals defaulted – there is a limit to which Mr. J can go on directly demanding money from the producers (i.e. by means of tax); Limited amount of tax money soon gets consumed, and beyond a particular point of taxation the producers rebel, even illiterate savages who believe in slavery to the tribe, rebel against their chief at some stage, so why would Americans not? When money gets exhausted, the poor, the needy etc too disappear along with their blessings, and more importantly their votes. Then the power, the statues, monuments, everything disappears. So there should be, at least seemingly so, an unlimited source of money to throw at the poor, the way Indian Maharajahs threw (looted) coins out of buckets at beggars running behind their chariots! At this point several lines about paper-money are cut: Many like Adam Smith have written about it, and the Founding Fathers had prescribed death penalty for this crime but their descendants are openly committing it in front of a demoralized nation of previously courageous people! And now there is no control on bail-outs, wars, hand-outs, subsidies – left and right robberies without any controls, qualms and shame! Want 5 billion? Print! What 5 billion too less, want 250 billion? Then print that much, why bother the Prez when he is waving to the masses? Reality is of course waiting around the corner to avenge, only that the appropriate moment arrives when the crash brings in the maximum loss. Based on responses to my earlier writing on the internet I can say that despite the Great Depression, most people have no idea of the meaning of irresponsible paper money in the hands of politicians – talks of austerity aimed at reducing doles is meaningless; not only that war-mongering is today the more expensive part, but the idea of majority opinion determining truth and supporting rulers’ irresponsibility is the ultimate recipe for big-bang collapse – paper money will simply hasten the process!
Despite the dollar-printing factory I can say with full confidence that full-fledged slavery is going on in America – how? Newly printed extra dollars do reduce the value of existing dollars, but imagine the situation that all Americans stop working and merely print more and more dollars to bring in universal prosperity in America! It wouldn’t take more than 1-2 years for the world to discard the toilet paper currency, its value would soon become zero. So even if the value gets reduced, whatever value remains is also because of the people who work as slaves while parasites and their leaders lord over producers. In this context remember Reagan’s irresponsible claim that debts don’t matter: then why did he not give $100 bn to every American so as to enjoy? The entire GOP gang that worships him as hero knows that debts do matter, so they create only as much debt as supports their momentary survival and chest-beating, though they know that in the long run they are finishing off America! Also: GOP’s war-mongering is far more expensive than Dems’ welfare and Reagan’s party is using American boys as cannon fodder to support their political survival; and therefore “Debts don’t matter”! Means: from one side the Dems have reduced honest productive Americans to slaves of parasites; from other side, because of their inability to answer Dems’ onslaught, the GOP is using them as cannon fodder! This show will go on – but only for so long, till another Caesar takes over the American Empire!
As seen in the sub-article ‘Democracy as Fertile Ground for Moral Degeneration’, either a dishonest, or at least mediocre but ambitious man will more be prone to accept the job of gaining votes of ‘have-nots’ by giving doles out of other peoples’ money, while an honest man will not do this – Johnson is one amongst many such men encouraged by democracy – and the dollar printing factory is in their hands!
But all Dem presidents from FDR to today are same, viz. communists (see their party resolution ahead). They shed many tears, felt a lot for the poor – and used society’s (i.e. others’) money for their charity-cum-vested interest. JFK’s famous speech, that 5000 year old cliché, that eternal banality, is also given a special name, the “Do not ask what your country can do for you” speech, as if engraved on stone. Rob the producers and get airport, parks, libraries, museums, colleges, schools, institutions etc named after you; in addition, indulge in sex-scandals and yet achieve sainthood.
Elsewhere in my writing I have explained this phenomenon (charity via government) can be practiced only by saying “Unselfishness? Non-egoism? Of course great ideals, but to be observed by others so that I can get away with my irrationalities, I will gain sainthood, earn commission, grab power” etc. “Go America go – work hard for your fellow brothers, sacrifice for the down-trodden, wipe their eyes, drink their tears, lick their wounds – work hard and sacrifice. I too will be looking after the welfare of maids in hotels and of actresses.”
The above is the exact meaning of “Achieving Sainthood, commission and power by Charity, but at the cost of others”; explanation why this will lead to civil war is given ahead in sub-article Erosion of Reason as Root of Civil War.
Analysis of LBJ’s action is important – If men are talking about collapse of America, saving civilization etc, then it is important to fully understand LBJ! There is nothing great about his “Great Society”, no “War on Poverty” and no love of the masses but only war on productive people for the sake of sainthood, commission and power. There is nothing great about his works, it is just the work of a pick-pocket, done in open daylight – he has used the words society, public, etc. to hide the fact that he is merely looting productive people and transferring their wealth to parasites and in the meantime extracting commission, achieving sainthood and power. (At this point recall a previous sentence: “The reason why civilization fails at this point is that democracy is a fertile ground for ‘moral degeneration’, for increase of immorality in society where only a small, controllable amount of it existed earlier.” This is the root of that huge ‘unbeatable’ DVB (doles vote-block) the Dems have collected to destroy America! This is what the FFs could not secure the Republic against (which means entire mankind has not been able to transcend), while only the Aristotelian atmosphere of FFs’ times allowed them to achieve greatness.)
Elsewhere I have referred to Obama using the Executive Order too frequently (i.e. he is acting as a dictator by suspending the entire democratic process) – and recently the FCC simply ordered the internet service as government’s utilities – he has torpedoed America’s sovereignty on various scores (inviting the UN into America’s internal matters, amnesty to illegal immigrants etc being some examples) – all of it also belongs to the category of FDR–LBJ–JFK’s “greatness”! What is being explained here is the basis of it.
Important Questions about democracy: Observe an important point about the entire above: to achieve power, LBJ has relied on the votes of parasites, the ones to whom he is offering doles out of producers’ efforts – it’s a contract for mutual benefit amongst them – I will promise productive peoples’ money for you, you give me your votes; we will both gain at their cost, by looting them! That brings forth questions about the morality and honesty of the entire democratic process; it evokes the question, to what extent should honest men abide by the “vote” of the majority? Does truth depend on the opinion of the majority, or is truth to be established by objective reference to reality? Are the rights of an individual really “unalienable” or can they be so very easily trampled by the majority? It also again brings into question Jefferson’s “All men were created equal” – as far as I see it here, the productive individuals have easily been reduced to parasites’ slaves with the help of these 2-3 unquestionable beliefs of American people, the ones they think that have raised them far above “old Yorrup”! Wrong interpretation of equality has suddenly become the poison for the honest and the productive! To the extent that a man is honest, conscientious and responsible (i.e. he is good), he will work like a slave – to the extent he is dishonest, irresponsible, malingerer, drifter, parasite, robber (i.e. he is actually evil), he will be the master, the slave-owner! Honesty is the slave of dishonesty; the good is the slave of the evil – and this they call as “All men were created equal”! Now imagine the words “The Welfare State” – what meaning they have in human minds – welfare of whole mankind, general happiness, no sorrow, no pain, no selfishness, no egoism but men living like brothers (as preached by all religions), sharing each other’s burden … and so on. In reality, Welfare State is merely some bloody rogue offering producers’ money to encourage parasitism – it is not merely that he is offering producers’ money to a few parasites, but he is set to totally destroy a productive, individualist society by heavily increasing parasites beyond this point, because there is no need to work but merely vote for him – the actual meaning of welfare state merely reduces to invitation to rogues to destroy a great country / civilization to get their vested interest satisfied! But that has always been the meaning of all theories of unselfishness, non-egoism, self-sacrifice, charity etc – i.e. of communism and of all religions – the welfare state and democracy merely present the alternative as slow-poisoning which floored the mighty Americano! Had somebody proposed communism in the past – or do so even today – all Americans will rise in rebellion – but communism is already in, drop by drop, ml by ml and mm by mm, and they have not been able to do anything! The Founding Fathers had locked religion out of government by means of the wall of separation – now its essence has captured the White House – rulers looting the productive citizenry with the help of parasites! The implication of locking religion out of government is simple but very important: Those who want to practice it honestly (including its ethics of charity) can do so privately the way they want it and to the extent they want it – those who want to practice dishonesty and destroy society from behind it, are forbidden! Unable to answer Dems’ DVB, the Rep-Conzs are destroying America from the other side. Till men do not fully accept that charity via government (i.e. welfare state, doles etc) is the highest evil in human concerns, cheap rogues will keep destroying civilizations using the same. It is not big evil, it is not Satan – to name a few well-known ones from last century, it is not Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Ho Chi Minh – it is just small, mean cowards facilitated by relatively better men’s meanness of not accepting obvious facts. This has now brought me closer to a dilemma – I still consider today’s white Christians and Jews to be enlightened people when I compare them with other religions the world over – but some of the responses about “governmental charity only for those who are really in need” brings to my mind the phrase “Christian-nutters”!
Now as far as the racial angle is concerned: This paragraph is removed from this version because of misunderstanding about race, allegations etc though it gives full proof that both sides have changed stance for votes, but so also Af-Ams have changed their loyalty per benefit, i.e. democracy has taken its toll!
Question of responsibility Overall there is nothing great about America’s fall – no great conspiracy, no danger-diabolic, no Satan at work – just a bunch of cheap small-timers like LBJ have taken the US for a ride! His skill rests on single factor – intellectuals’ inability to explain it properly, their meanness of not allowing it when somebody else is doing it, and productive peoples’ cowardice not to identify it properly. LBJ is of-course an example – the game is thousands of years old, but this is the start of destruction of civilization. And if you give in to this cheapness Americano, you never deserved your inheritance, your legacy.
And finally a caution: Don’t be impatient, don’t draw the gun and kill a few arbitrary people on the street. Instead be adequately aroused that now you have to start action, AND UNITE – but you have to unite in a specific manner explained to some extent by me elsewhere in this book – unite for a specific purpose, viz. to preserve individualism, i.e. preserve the FF-Constitution. ELSE COLLAPSE OF CIVILIZATION RESTS ON YOU, NOT ON LBJ TYPE OF SMALL-TIMERS STRETCHING TO 4000 YEARS BACK.
Throughout mankind’s history, all those who are good at talking about charity, unselfishness etc and pointing at others’ money for their program, have made huge money for themselves and / or fame and publicity and achieved sainthood and power. That is one big racket nobody has busted so far, and the fate of civilization hangs on it…..
…..Now compare these governments (post 1900) with the Founding Fathers’ governments – the FFs were neither ready to use government monies to supply “purified water” to society, nor help a destitute war widow with it. Also compare today’s politicians with the FFs. The FFs were honest as well as sufficiently magnanimous. Some of them were poor (being upright farmers), and though they denied government money to the war widow, they pooled their personal money to help her! (The previously referred to web-site GOP anti-doles[4] titled Is Welfare Unconstitutional says that the man Davy Crockett who opposed government money to the widow was the poorest man in Congress but donated the most to her out of his personal money!) Today, many like LBJ are the opposite – millions of Peters’ money to millions of Pauls, and millions of commission to me, a small fee for my services, he, he, he, he! I kiss babies prior to elections and maids after the elections and shed tears for the poor Mexican children, he, he, he, he! (Remember: All of this is Democracy as Fertile Ground for Moral degeneration!) If Americans allow so very cheap a game to destroy their country – climax of rational man’s aspirations for civilization as I have called it in ASP-R – then they are to be blamed for it, not cheap, mediocre and dishonest politicians and bureaucrats. The unfortunate part is that many of the present shameless generations will have enjoyed during the phase of destruction, while leaving the effects of destruction (the debt) for the future generations to face! (Moral degeneration has spread amongst them too a lot.)
The crucial point of difference is using government for charity – its not charity itself, but using government for charity and achieving sainthood, commission and power at the cost of others. (Remaining paragraph is presently cut from this version).
But do not jump to wrong conclusions – Republicans are more expensive than the Dems, but method is different, war-mongering and plutocracy of bail-outs.
Comment: Since this OP has become too long, I urge readers to see rest of the material (mainly doings of Republican-Conservatives) on Spencer’s website https://americanemesis.wordpress.com.
Remember that unlike other critics of democracy Spencer has achieved novel solution to the problems of democracy, welfare state, war-mongering, plutocracy etc. It is a different matter that he has no position in American society, is heroically fighting religious persecution in India. He needs Americans’ support – but equally, they too need him very badly.
