Trump & the Establishment [edit]

openfire

Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2008
Messages
1,810
On the face of it, Trump is Reagan on steroids. His towering size, his nativist US supremacism, his down-home talk, and his reality-show confidence make him ideal for the role of bullying and big lies from the oval office. He is America come to meet itself in larger-than-life image to rejuvenate it as its pride slips away in third-world conditions and a multi-polar world.

While Trump’s narrative is that the American Dream seeks recovery again, the dominant media and political elite relentlessly denounce him as an implicit fascist and disastrous fake. Something deeper is afoot. An untapped historic resentment is boiling up from underneath which has long been unspeakable on the political stage. Trump has mined it and proposed a concrete solution always denied of his candidacy. From his promise to halve the Pentagon’s budget to getting the Congress off corporate-donation payrolls, the public money that the big corporate lobbies stand to lose from a Trump presidency are off the charts. But his attackers dare not recognize these explosive issues because they are all part of the problem.

The public money stakes may be bigger than the US corporate stakes behind the foreign wars the US state has initiated since 1991. The takeaway promised by Trump’s policies threaten almost every big lobby now in control of US government purse strings. It grounds in the military-industrial complex spending close to $2,000,000,000 a day for its endless new untested weapons and foreign wars both of which Trump opposes. But the cut-off of hundreds of billions of public giveaways to the Big Corps do not end here. They hit almost every wide-mouthed transnational corporate siphon into the US Treasury, taxpayers’ pockets and the working majority of America. Masses of American citizens increasingly without living wages and benefits and in increasing public squalor and insecurity are paying attention to what the political establishment and corporate media have long buried and continue to silence.

Trump has raised the great dispossession from impotence into the establishment’s face, and this is why he is a contagion on the American political scene. He is pervasively mocked, accused and slandered in non-stop public fireworks of ad hominem hits, but the counter-attacks never engage what Trump has set his sights on – the long stripping of America by
cancerstagecorporate globalization selecting for the limitless enrichment of the very rich living off an ever-growing take from public coffers and the impoverishment of America’s working people. A primal rage unites the political establishment across party lines, but they can’t say why. No defaming scorn and abuse is off limits, but Trump’s underlying betrayal of the ruling game remains unspeakable on the stage.

The electoral dynamite of all the Americans who have lost all their good blue-collar jobs, social benefits and public infrastructures is recognized only in class condescension. But the facts cannot be denied of a corporate globalization effectively stripping the lower middle classes and the public realm itself with no-one in Washington establishment saying a word against the greatest transfer of wealth to the 1% in history.

Trump may deserve back as bad he gives. But this understanding keeps our eyes on the ego-contest which is the standard spectacle to avoid the real issues. The personal attacks only tells us how deep the rupture has become between Trump’s campaign and the establishment on the issues kept out of sight. This is why the corporate politicians and media are almost as wound into one-way demonization of Trump as they are when they beat the drums of war against a designated Enemy abroad.

In the end, it may get to him – as when he tries to find angry millions again from onside with an evangelical trumpet of abortion-is-murder just before the primary in Wisconsin.

Trump is a shameless opportunist, no doubt. Yet we continue to revolve within an ad hominem circle until we go deeper than the establishment morality tale of the evil of the stigma object – the oldest propaganda trick in the book. The major money interests that are really at stake in the conflict between Trump and the political-economic establishment remain unconnected and blocked out. “Who will stop Trump’ is not only now asked across America, but the world’s media in China too. But nothing is less talked about than the globally powerful interests he has promised to rein back from the public troughs bleeding the country’s capacities to build for and to employ its people. On this topic, there is only silence or abusive distortion frothing from the mouth.

Joining the Dots of the Great Silence

Eventually people may ask why the establishment unanimously abhors Trump across party divisions which are otherwise unbridgeable. Even if he is a caricature of American privilege and self-promotion, who else could fight the corrupt corporate-state and media establishment? Who else could ever get public support from dispossessed masses and from inside the Republican Party base itself? Who else could take on the supra-dominant corporate interests of the war state, drug monopoly, health insurance racket, lobby-run foreign policy, off-shore tax evasion, and global trade with only corporate rights to profit taking jobs in the tens of millions from home workers, and still hold a large and right-wing voter base onside?

Conversely, what else than Trump’s threat to the corporate-state establishment can explain the unity of voice and venom against an American paragon of wealth and chupzpah? What else could motivate a cross-party and corporate media hate campaign where there is nothing else in common across the condemning voices? Only those citizens depending on the deep system corruptions he promises to reverse are really threatened by Trump’s candidacy. But how do these huge private interests go on getting away with a corporate-lobby state transferring every more public wealth and control to them at the expense of the American majority and their common interest when most people already dislike and are systemically exploited by them? They get away with it by no-one being able to do anything about it.

Trump represents a threat to these gargantuan public-trough interests that even the super clean and informed Ralph Nader candidacy for president never did. The corporate media and party machines just shut him down on the electoral stage so few even knew he was a presidential candidate. You can’t do that with Trump. That is the very big problem for the otherwise seamless political and media establishment who are all in on the fabulous payoffs of this corporate state game. Trump’s entire strategy is based on getting public attention, and he is a master at it, unbuyably rich, and the most watched person in America across the country and the world. He can’t be shut up. Personal stigmatization and attack without let-up are the only way to gag his policies and turn the tide against him at the same time.

Maybe it will work in the end. It’s how disastrous and bankrupting foreign aggressions and wars have been sold whatever the ruinous costs to the public paying for them.

Until Wisconsin

When you join the dots to Trump also preaching a policy revolt against the insatiable corporate jaws feeding on trillions of dollars of public budgets in Washington, the meaning becomes clear. But that connected meaning is blacked out. In its place, the corporate media and politicians present an egomaniac blowhard bordering on fascism who preaches hate, racism and sexism. But the silenced policies he advocates are more like jumping into a crocodile pit. He is on record saying he will cut the Pentagon’s budget “by 50%”. No winning politician has ever dared to take on the military-industrial complex, with even Eisenhower only naming it in his parting speech. Trump also says that the US “must be neutral, an honest broker” on the Israeli-Palestine conflict – as unspeakable as it gets in US politics. Big Pharma is also called out with “$400 billion to be saved by government negotiation of prices”. The even more powerful HMO’s are confronted by the possibility of a “one-payer system”, the devil incarnate in America’s corporate-welfare state.

Trump even challenges “the Enemy” cornerstone of US ideology when he says “wouldn’t it be nice to get along with Russia and China for a change?” Not very fascist of him. He was also open to nationalizing the Wall Street banks after 2008. None of this sees the light of day in the hate-Trump culture that been effectively mounted across even left-right divisions. Most of all, Trump rejects the whole misnamed “free trade” global system because it has “hollowed out the lives of American workers” with rights to corporations to move anywhere to get cheaper labour and import back into the US tariff-free. But again the connected meaning is repressed. That Trump also wants to get the US out of foreign wars at the same time, the other great pillar of corporate globalization, is the real danger to the transnational corporate state he has set in motion.

All these policies threaten only the ruling money interests of America that depend on the superpower public purse to extend their transnational monopolies and multiply their wealth. This is the real establishment interest that has so far evaded the glare of publicity and critique of the Donald Trump phenomenon, bigger now with Bernie Sanders than any political challenge to the US system since the 1960’s. Trump is certainly not a working-class hero. He is a pure capitalist, with all the furies of private interest and greed that capitalism selects for. But at this time he is a capitalist who is not rich from looting the public purse as the biggest annual cash flow, nor from exporting the costs of labor and taxes to foreign jurisdictions with subhuman standards that come back to the US as “necessary to compete”. Trump has initiated a long overdue recognition of parasite capitalism eating out the life capacities of the US itself.
http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/04/05/why-the-establishment-hates-trump/
 
The Republican establishment doesn't want him to be the nominee because he is a terrible candidate and will almost certainly lose the election in a year that should be favorable to the Republicans. He will inspire Democrats everywhere to turn out against him, costing Republican politicians dearly down-ballot.
 
The "Establishment" doesn't hate Trump.

There are parts of the establishment that hate him, but don't be fooled into believing that he isn't one of them.

Trump does represent a threat to some special interests, but there are other special interests that would benefit. (In fact, many of them are already benefitting - huge!)

You know it's funny how you see all sides of the establishment pointing fingers at each other trying to label the other as "establishment". lol. And the morons follow.
 
The Republican establishment doesn't want him to be the nominee because he is a terrible candidate and will almost certainly lose the election in a year that should be favorable to the Republicans. He will inspire Democrats everywhere to turn out against him, costing Republican politicians dearly down-ballot.

And yet, the Republican establishment will support Hillary if Trump is the nominee...

Bill Kristol: I Would Rather See Hillary Win Than Trump

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/bill-kristol-donald-trump-president-weekly-standard/2016/03/02/id/717115/

Kristol Lays Out Strategy to Give White House to Hillary: Trump ‘Shouldn’t Win’


http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/03/02/kristol-lays-strategy-give-white-house-hillary-trump-shouldnt-win/

1310266069084862380-3.png
 
Empty threats.

I don't think so. If it was empty threats, they wouldn't have been so public in their attempts to destroy Trump's candidacy. Because doing so, will cause a mass exodus from the Republican Party. They know that. But, their main focus is getting someone elected who will keep the spigot open. In their eyes, Trump is an unknown factor; they know for a fact that Hillary is one of their own.
 
I don't think so. If it was empty threats, they wouldn't have been so public in their attempts to destroy Trump's candidacy. Because doing so, will cause a mass exodus from the Republican Party. They know that. But, their main focus is getting someone elected who will keep the spigot open. In their eyes, Trump is an unknown factor; they know for a fact that Hillary is one of their own.

The establishment knows their own unpopularity, so I think Trump might be some sort of controlled opposition.
 
The establishment knows their own unpopularity, so I think Trump might be some sort of controlled opposition.

It's a possibility, but we should all know for sure what Cruz is.

Controlled opposition is most useful when there is some great candidate out there that they want to keep you from. There is no such person running at this time. Yet, they have gone out of their way and exposed the hell out of themselves, in doing everything in their power to make sure Trump doesn't win. Have you ever asked yourself why? If they were sure he was one of their own, why would they go to the trouble?
 
Last edited:
All I know about Bernie is the cries of "He's a socialist!" while many, many youngsters flock to his rallies.

Reminds me of the cries against Ron Paul, "He's an isolationist!" as youngsters did the same.

Hillary and Cruz are guaranteed more of the same. Trump at least has some degree of being an unknown.

It's worth a gamble - for me at least.
 
It's a possibility, but we should all know for sure what Cruz is.

Controlled opposition is most useful when there is some great candidate out there that they want to keep you from. There is no such person running at this time. Yet, they have gone out of their way and exposed the hell out of themselves, in doing everything in their power to make sure Trump doesn't win. Have you ever asked yourself why? If they were sure he was one of their own, why would they go to the trouble?

I don't think they exposed themselves. These were just things that people already knew about the establishment GOP. The average Republican voter already hated the establishment. That's how in Kentucky in 2014 the US Senate Majority had to defend himself against a serious threat from someone no one had even heard of before.
 
I don't think they exposed themselves. These were just things that people already knew about the establishment GOP. The average Republican voter already hated the establishment. That's how in Kentucky in 2014 the US Senate Majority had to defend himself against a serious threat from someone no one had even heard of before.

My God, they have publicly said that they might totally disregard the votes and choose whomever the hell they want to. I'm talking about even if Trump had earned the delegates he needed for the nomination. Now THAT is exposure. Someone would have to be blind not to notice the 24 x 7 onslaught against Trump.
 
Trump is the very foundation for globalism. Without politicians like trump creating the tight reins of authoritarianism in this country, the next globalist politician cannot present the country for global control without it rebelling from within.
 
Without politicians like trump creating the tight reins of authoritarianism in this country, the next globalist politician cannot present the country for global control without it rebelling from within.

That ship sailed a long time ago.
 
The "Establishment" doesn't hate Trump.

There are parts of the establishment that hate him, but don't be fooled into believing that he isn't one of them.

Trump does represent a threat to some special interests, but there are other special interests that would benefit. (In fact, many of them are already benefitting - huge!)

You know it's funny how you see all sides of the establishment pointing fingers at each other trying to label the other as "establishment". lol. And the morons follow.

Ha ha. :(
 
My God, they have publicly said that they might totally disregard the votes and choose whomever the hell they want to. I'm talking about even if Trump had earned the delegates he needed for the nomination. Now THAT is exposure. Someone would have to be blind not to notice the 24 x 7 onslaught against Trump.

Trump is a major liability to the Republican Party. It makes sense that they wouldn't want him to be their nominee.
 
The Republican establishment doesn't want him to be the nominee because he is a terrible candidate and will almost certainly lose the election in a year that should be favorable to the Republicans. He will inspire Democrats everywhere to turn out against him, costing Republican politicians dearly down-ballot.

That didn't stop the GOP the last several times they served up terrible candidates to the party, who were certain to lose the election. Much more likely, the elite doesn't want Trump because he potentially could beat Hillary, and that messes up the establishment wide plan to install her as President this year. The plan was obviously for Bush, Walker, or Rubio to throw the election to her, not for a loose cannon egotistic billionaire to knock all three of those stooges out of the race.

The establishment prefers their sacrificial lambs to be low key robots who do not raise questions about the current regime, not loudmouth Trumps whose statements have done nothing BUT upset the apple cart, from open borders, to trade deals, to questioning the Iraq war, to defunding NATO, etc. If Rand had done most of this and acted like an outsider, he would have been the front runner under siege at this point, not Trump.
 
Last edited:
Mississippi poll: Clinton within 3 points of Trump

By Nolan D. McCaskill

04/05/16 12:07 PM EDT

Despite winning Mississippi's Republican presidential primary by double digits, Donald Trump could turn Mississippi blue for the first time in 40 years, according to a Mason-Dixon poll released Tuesday.

Trump won Mississippi last month with 47 percent of the vote, an 11-point advantage over Ted Cruz, his closest rival. But the Mason-Dixon poll suggests that Trump fares the worst against Hillary Clinton in a general election — meaning the state could vote for the Democrat for the first time in a presidential election since 1976, when Jimmy Carter carried the state by a narrow margin over incumbent President Gerald Ford.

The Republican front-runner holds a 3-point lead over Clinton statewide, 46 percent to 43 percent with 11 percent undecided. Trump’s advantage, however, falls within the margin of error, while Cruz and John Kasich safely carry the state by double-digit margins.

Compared with his Republican rivals, Trump has the least percentage of support across the board. Cruz and Kasich have a greater percentage of support among white and black voters; men and women; and Democrats, Republicans and independents.

The survey of 625 registered voters in Mississippi was conducted March 28-30 by landlines and cellphones. The margin of error is plus or minus 4 percentage points.

In 2012, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney carried Mississippi by 12 percentage points over President Barack Obama.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-...04/mississippi-poll-2016-clinton-trump-221572
 
Back
Top