Trump supported Hillary's Libya agenda from the beginning

[jmdrake]

I know I will be neg repped for pointing this out. Some people on this forum just can't handle the truth. But if this doesn't prove Trump is controlled opposition nothing will. Trump called for troops to go into Libya to "stop Khaddafi".



And post Benghazi, Trump called Hillary one of the "best secretaries of state" ever.



You don't think HIllary will use this to ward off whatever attacks Trump throws against her? People keep saying "Don't underestimate Trump". Well don't underestimate the Clintons either. And Trump has given them plenty of material to work with.

Now bring on those undeserved neg reps!

 

[juleswin]

Good money says they will avoid trying to explain anything said in this video and avoid your post entirely. These kind of truth fucks with the head of even a true believer. After this all they have to hang on with Trump is that he is politically incorrect. Which in my book is an OK quality but not enough reason to risk voting for a man who in all likelihood is working for the Clintons.

 

[CPUd]

Apparently this whole thing is a plan to fool the elites. Or stick it to the elites or something. If you don't believe this, it's probably because you are a "SJW" or "PC".

 

[Chester Copperpot]

well at least im glad to see an anti-trump thread that isnt started by CPUd.

nobody should neg rep you for posting factual video...

i might support trump right now, but its one of those cautiously optimistic things.. Trump is an unknown.. could be good.. could be bad.. could be really bad or really good...

but until theres a better alternative....

 

[CPUd]

well at least im glad to see an anti-trump thread that isnt started by CPUd.

nobody should neg rep you for posting factual video...

i might support trump right now, but its one of those cautiously optimistic things.. Trump is an unknown.. could be good.. could be bad.. could be really bad or really good...

but until theres a better alternative....

Yeah we tried that for about 6 months. Trumpanzees only respond to 1 thing, and it's not facts.

 

[cajuncocoa]

I know I will be neg repped for pointing this out. Some people on this forum just can't handle the truth. But if this doesn't prove Trump is controlled opposition nothing will. Trump called for troops to go into Libya to "stop Khaddafi".



And post Benghazi, Trump called Hillary one of the "best secretaries of state" ever.



You don't think HIllary will use this to ward off whatever attacks Trump throws against her? People keep saying "Don't underestimate Trump". Well don't underestimate the Clintons either. And Trump has given them plenty of material to work with.

Now bring on those undeserved neg reps!

+rep for truth

 

[FindLiberty]

OK,

Now I'm stockpiling EXTRA popcorn in my underground bunker fortress!
Bottled water, blocks of dried cheese and a really great rotary grater, CHECK.

Maybe for the first few years, they should just give Trump the
dummy nuclear football, just in case his finger suddenly gets twitchy.
It might take Trump several weeks into 2017 before he realizes
it's non-functional and does not launch a WW3 M.A.D nuclear exchange.

I'm counting on him to make America great again. It should be easy to
make significant improvements from the current state of affairs.

 

[RonPaulMall]

well at least im glad to see an anti-trump thread that isnt started by CPUd.

nobody should neg rep you for posting factual video...

i might support trump right now, but its one of those cautiously optimistic things.. Trump is an unknown.. could be good.. could be bad.. could be really bad or really good...

but until theres a better alternative....

The video is highly misleading because it implies Trump endorses Hillary's record as Secretary State when in fact he is carefully to simply note that she's going to be judged on that record above all else and that he expects her to defend her record in the campaign. These are simply objective facts and in no way inconsistent with Trump's argument that she is the worst Secretary State of all time.

 

[jmdrake]

The video is highly misleading because it implies Trump endorses Hillary's record as Secretary State when in fact he is carefully to simply note that she's going to be judged on that record above all else and that he expects her to defend her record in the campaign. These are simply objective facts and in no way inconsistent with Trump's argument that she is the worst Secretary State of all time.

Ummmm....wrong. Trump specifically said "How did she do as secretary of state? Probably above everybody else and everything else." The video is not at all misleading.

 

[Chester Copperpot]

The video is highly misleading because it implies Trump endorses Hillary's record as Secretary State when in fact he is carefully to simply note that she's going to be judged on that record above all else and that he expects her to defend her record in the campaign. These are simply objective facts and in no way inconsistent with Trump's argument that she is the worst Secretary State of all time.

I find that video irrelevant to be honest... when you gotta be buddy buddy with people thats what you do... its all a little bullshit here and there.. hes just playing the game as a businessman.....

 

[FriedChicken]

The video is highly misleading because it implies Trump endorses Hillary's record as Secretary State when in fact he is carefully to simply note that she's going to be judged on that record above all else and that he expects her to defend her record in the campaign. These are simply objective facts and in no way inconsistent with Trump's argument that she is the worst Secretary State of all time.

You're right. It's not like he said over and over about how much he liked her and that her record will show her going above and beyond and doing a good jobor anything.

I don't understand how anyone could watch this video and think he likes Hillary.

And the the while Libya thing should just be ignored, obviously.

(It's sad that I now feel the need to include a disclaimer pointing out that I'm being sarcastic, but with all the trumps running around saying idiotic things it's best to assume anyone will pick up on the sarcasm.

I'm actually unsure if the statement I'm replying to is serious or sarcastic myself actually)

 

[FriedChicken]

I find that video irrelevant to be honest... when you gotta be buddy buddy with people thats what you do... its all a little bull$#@! here and there.. hes just playing the game as a businessman.....

Is this another post that forgot to include the sarcasm disclaimer or is everyone around here doing rush Limbaugh impersonations or something?
Is there an inside joke I don't know about?

Or is everyone actually as stupid as the stuff they're saying? Please let it be an inside joke.

 

[Chester Copperpot]

Is this another post that forgot to include the sarcasm disclaimer or is everyone around here doing rush Limbaugh impersonations or something?
Is there an inside joke I don't know about?

Or is everyone actually as stupid as the stuff they're saying? Please let it be an inside joke.

no, im not joking... if im a businessman and i have to make nice with polticians.. that includes making donations to their campaigns and stupid statements like this to kiss her ass...

could it be he sincerely believed it? sure.. but we'll never know...

I know theres a lot of unhappiness in here about trump and I get it.. nobody is going to really be enthusiastic about president trump like they would about ron or rand but right now I personally think hes the best person for the job... it could change if gary johnson gets traction or if somebody else jumps in like jesse ventura.. then id have to re-evaluate... but over the course of this campaign ive gone from not trusting trump to believing he is sincere.. I believe he sincerely wants to do what he thinks is best for America.. But hes Jacksonian, not libertarian.. maybe he's strong enough to get rid of the central bank like Jackson.. maybe he'll be a tyrant.. who knows but ill take the chance right now because everybody else is a guaranteed shill IMO

 

[Brian4Liberty]

I know I will be neg repped for pointing this out. Some people on this forum just can't handle the truth. But if this doesn't prove Trump is controlled opposition nothing will. Trump called for troops to go into Libya to "stop Khaddafi".

Wow. That's identical to neoconservative propaganda pre-Iraq. "They'll greet us with flowers and give us oil money!"

 

[CPUd]

 

[klamath]

Wow. That's identical to neoconservative propaganda pre-Iraq. "They'll greet us with flowers and give us oil money!"

Agreed. Libya was a far more destabilizing intervention than Iraq. Quadaffi couldn't hold a candle to the atrocities Saddamn committed. The Syrian rebels were sure the US and Europe was going to provide them with an air force otherwise they would never have committed to the war. The lawless land in east Syria is were ISIS built itself not Iraq.

 

[RonPaulMall]

Ummmm....wrong. Trump specifically said "How did she do as secretary of state? Probably above everybody else and everything else." The video is not at all misleading.

WRONG. What he says is, "You'll be looking at the record of Hillary Clinton. How did she do as Secretary of State; probably above everybody else and everything else." Trump is talking about Hillary's potential run for President and he's suggesting that her record as Secretary of State is what she's going to be judged on over everything else. He isn't providing any commentary on what he things that legacy is whether good or bad. He's just offering his insight and analysis on what Hillary is going to be judged on.

 

[FriedChicken]

WRONG. What he says is, "You'll be looking at the record of Hillary Clinton. How did she do as Secretary of State; probably above everybody else and everything else." Trump is talking about Hillary's potential run for President and he's suggesting that her record as Secretary of State is what she's going to be judged on over everything else. He isn't providing any commentary on what he things that legacy is whether good or bad. He's just offering his insight and analysis on what Hillary is going to be judged on.

Wait, you're serious aren't you?
If I were president I would pass an executive order that required you to end every post with "yes, I'm being serious" or "just kidding!".

And I would probably have you deported or assassinated. Maybe I would deport you, then say you can come back, then threaten to assassinate you, then sue you to pay for it.

Then you'd probably support me for re-election and make splendid excuses for everything I just said.

I'm so un predictable there is a chance I might do something you like, or world war three!
The only thing you can be sure of is I have no principles, only care about myself and campaign like a scarface impersonator.

FriedChicken 2020!
(Someone else can come up with my campaign slogan, use the best words you have)

 

[RonPaulMall]

Wait, you're serious aren't you?
If I were president I would pass an executive order that required you to end every post with "yes, I'm being serious" or "just kidding!".

And I would probably have you deported or assassinated. Maybe I would deport you, then say you can come back, then threaten to assassinate you, then sue you to pay for it.

Then you'd probably support me for re-election and make splendid excuses for everything I just said.

I'm so un predictable there is a chance I might do something you like, or world war three!
The only thing you can be sure of is I have no principles, only care about myself and campaign like a scarface impersonator.

FriedChicken 2020!
(Someone else can come up with my campaign slogan, use the best words you have)

The video speaks for itself. The creator obviously tried to edit it in a way to obscure what Trump was actually saying as much as possible but it still clear as day what Trump is actually talking about in that video. There is no endorsement of Hillary. Just an observation that she'd going to be judged primarily on her tenure as Secretary of State. And as Trump himself pointed out, she's been the worst Secretary of State in American history.

 

[klamath]

The video speaks for itself. The creator obviously tried to edit it in a way to obscure what Trump was actually saying as much as possible but it still clear as day what Trump is actually talking about in that video. There is no endorsement of Hillary. Just an observation that she'd going to be judged primarily on her tenure as Secretary of State. And as Trump himself pointed out, she's been the worst Secretary of State in American history.

Yeaw he considers her bad because she didn't put troops into Libya and have them give us their oil......Shit trump is making Hillary look like the noninterventionist.