Trump says his Sister, a Pro-Abortion Extremist, would be “phenomenal” SCOTUS nominee

William Tell

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Messages
12,146
Trump says his Sister, a Pro-Abortion Extremist, would be “phenomenal” SCOTUS nominee

Trump Praises His Sister, a Pro-Abortion Extremist Judge

Donald Trump told Mark Halperin yesterday that his sister, a federal judge, would be a “phenomenal” Supreme Court justice. He also said that “we will have to rule that out now, at least.”

If he ever becomes president, let’s hope he rules it out permanently. Maryanne Trump Barry came up in my book The Party of Death for writing one of those heated judicial decisions in favor of giving constitutional protection to partial-birth abortion. She called a New Jersey law against it a “desperate attempt” to undermine Roe v. Wade.
It was, she wrote, “based on semantic machinations, irrational line-drawing, and an obvious attempt to inflame public opinion instead of logic or medical evidence.” It made no difference where the fetus was when it “expired.”

So: The right of abortionists to make a child “expire” by partially extracting her from the womb, sticking scissors in the back of her head, vacuuming out her brain, and crushing her skull to complete her extraction, is right there in the Constitution. But let’s please not have any “semantic machinations.”
http://www.nationalreview.com/corne...r-pro-abortion-extremist-judge-ramesh-ponnuru
 
That's okay, the pro-life paleocons will continue to make excuses for him. Dude could eat a live baby with catsup on television and these dingbats would be arguing over whether he picked the best brand of catsup.
 
It made no difference where the fetus was when it “expired.”
I am surprised any federal judge would think so bizarre as that . . . she would NEVER ever get confirmed . . .
in fact none of Trump appointees would EVER get confirmed - lol - total chaos and anarchy for the USA.

That's okay, the pro-life paleocons will continue to make excuses for him. Dude could eat a live baby with catsup on television and these dingbats would be arguing over whether he picked the best brand of catsup.

lol . . . sick but funny and on point . . .

Trump already picking his appointees and cabinet . . . All in the Family anybuddy ?
 
Last edited:
there is a nepotism law, since JFK appointed RFK, that would prohibit that. and she would never never get 60 senate votes anyway. in this case its just a guy proud of his sister.

families should not be a campaign issue unless they participate (Bill Clinton would be a legitimate target, Jill Biden would not)
 
That's okay, the pro-life paleocons will continue to make excuses for him. Dude could eat a live baby with catsup on television and these dingbats would be arguing over whether he picked the best brand of catsup.

Was it made in the USA, or dumped on us by the Chinese?
 
That's okay, the pro-life paleocons will continue to make excuses for him. Dude could eat a live baby with catsup on television and these dingbats would be arguing over whether he picked the best brand of catsup.

It seems like some folks who style themselves paleocons are really just single issue voters. Too bad Trump is a flip flopping fake on the single issue they love.
 
That's okay, the pro-life paleocons will continue to make excuses for him. Dude could eat a live baby with catsup on television and these dingbats would be arguing over whether he picked the best brand of catsup.

It's always helpful to insult the people in the Republican Party who are the most likely people in the Republican Party to vote for Rand. A winning strategy there, Gunny.
 
An excellent SCOTUS Judge. He would appoint her citing Bobby Kennedy as justification. Trumps positions make the perfect storm of evil.
 
there is a nepotism law, since JFK appointed RFK, that would prohibit that. and she would never never get 60 senate votes anyway. in this case its just a guy proud of his sister.

families should not be a campaign issue unless they participate (Bill Clinton would be a legitimate target, Jill Biden would not)
Bullshit. He said she would make an excellent SC Judge. He didn't just say she was a good sister he enforced her views. ANYBODY the defend Late term abortion is Evil and shouldn't be anywhere near the SC.
 
there is a nepotism law, since JFK appointed RFK, that would prohibit that. and she would never never get 60 senate votes anyway. in this case its just a guy proud of his sister.

families should not be a campaign issue unless they participate (Bill Clinton would be a legitimate target, Jill Biden would not)
He isn't talking about hiring family as campaign staff or secretary or something. He's saying she would be great on the highest of courts.
 
It's always helpful to insult the people in the Republican Party who are the most likely people in the Republican Party to vote for Rand. A winning strategy there, Gunny.

I've got to agree with LE on this one, Gunny.

You don't want people to be exposed to truths that may interfere with their instinctive voting reflex. Your comments could influence droves of people to turn away from Rand. After all, there were as many as eighteen users looking at this forum at the time of this posting.
 
Last edited:
I've got to agree with LE on this one, Gunny.

You don't want people to be exposed to truths that may interfere with their instinctive voting reflex. Your comments could influence droves of people to turn away from Rand. After all, there were as many as eighteen users looking at this forum at the time of this posting.

Gunny's comment wouldn't affect my vote, but it could probably sway some others. Having said that, there needs to be a concerted effort to try and talk some sense into some of these Evangelical voters that are all set to compromise their principles for the sake of electing an "R" that would be just as bad on abortion as Hillary Clinton. I can understand these people going for someone like Huckabee, regardless of how bad he is on everything else, but the so-called support that Trump has among self-professing evangelicals is downright bizarre and can only be explained by the hypnotic effects of the cult of celebrity.
 
I've got to agree with LE on this one, Gunny.

You don't want people to be exposed to truths that may interfere with their instinctive voting reflex. Your comments could influence droves of people to turn away from Rand. After all, there were as many as eighteen users looking at this forum at the time of this posting.

It appears as if I must go back to using the /s symbol on my posts.
 
I've got to agree with LE on this one, Gunny.

You don't want people to be exposed to truths that may interfere with their instinctive voting reflex. Your comments could influence droves of people to turn away from Rand. After all, there were as many as eighteen users looking at this forum at the time of this posting.

Lol :D Yeah, well you know what? That 0.000002% of the Primary electorate that will read my post and get offended because I call Trump and his minions out for the hypocrites they are can kiss my ass. God Himself is allowing these people to be deluded in order to demonstrate that they have no love of truth, and therefore deserve to be sent to hell...and who am I to argue with God? :)
 
It's always helpful to insult the people in the Republican Party who are the most likely people in the Republican Party to vote for Rand. A winning strategy there, Gunny.

I don't see the need to be politically correct when talking about Trump supporters, just call them whatever that you honestly think they are cos they hate nothing more that people who are PC. Be more like Trump and do not self censor when talking about them. Personally I throw out the whole "if you have nothing good to say, don't say anything at all" advice when it comes to these idiots.
 
Last edited:
Lol :D Yeah, well you know what? That 0.000002% of the Primary electorate that will read my post and get offended because I call Trump and his minions out for the hypocrites they are can kiss my ass. God Himself is allowing these people to be deluded in order to demonstrate that they have no love of truth, and therefore deserve to be sent to hell...and who am I to argue with God? :)

So you now believe these forums are not as powerful as you thought they were?

You have been all over these forums recently saying the reason Breitbart and the media are reporting Rand supporters are leaving for Trump are due to reading of these forums. You even accused me at one point of being the sole reason that the media is saying supporters are leaving Rand for Trump.
 
It's always helpful to insult the people in the Republican Party who are the most likely people in the Republican Party to vote for Rand. A winning strategy there, Gunny.
insult away . . . your vote doesn't count anyway in Faux News rigged polling and elections . . . right ?

Not sure how pro-abortion SCOTUS advocates could be potential Rand supporters . . . but you are entitled to that warped perspective in a libertarian forum . . .



.
 
I don't see the need to be politically correct when talking about Trump supporters, just call them whatever that you honestly think they are cos they hate nothing more that people who are PC. Be more like Trump and do not self censor when talking about them. Personally I throw out the whole "if you have nothing good to say, don't say anything at all" advice when it comes to these idiots.

Seriously, this mirrors my thought process perfectly. A huge part of why I pull no punches is because Trumpsters claim they like non - PC hard and harsh truth pulling no punches while my belief is that they just want to be told whatever they want to hear, and that they actually hate non-PC speech as much as anyone. Every time I talk to one of the idiots they prove my theory correct. :D
 
So you now believe these forums are not as powerful as you thought they were?

You have been all over these forums recently saying the reason Breitbart and the media are reporting Rand supporters are leaving for Trump are due to reading of these forums. You even accused me at one point of being the sole reason that the media is saying supporters are leaving Rand for Trump.
You are desperately confused, but given your support for the Rump that comes as no surprise. Making it falsely appear as though Ron Paul supporters are flocking to The Rump has leaked out to the Big6 Media, which "news" reaches tens of millions.

It is not news that non-Rump supporters don't like Rump.

This was explained, in painstaking and agonizing detail right from the start. Are you deliberately ignoring it or are you really just that dumb? Given your support for Mr Rump, I will assume the latter.
 
there is a nepotism law, since JFK appointed RFK, that would prohibit that. and she would never never get 60 senate votes anyway. in this case its just a guy proud of his sister.

families should not be a campaign issue unless they participate (Bill Clinton would be a legitimate target, Jill Biden would not)

Thank God !!
 
Back
Top