Trump forcing activation of 2A by defying Supreme Court

idiom

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
8,598
9-0 ruling to return a deportee. Trump says 'make me'.

The constitutional solution is the second amendment to get the executive back inside the rule of law...

Otherwise its like.... a Coup by a general, or secession by law abiding states?
 
The coup would be the judicial branch of the United States grabbing power that the Executive branch or the Congress has.

Congress could infact order the president to invade El Salvador and annex the El Salvadorian citizen but I have never seen the judicial branch do it.
 
9-0 ruling to return a deportee. Trump says 'make me'.

The constitutional solution is the second amendment to get the executive back inside the rule of law...

Otherwise its like.... a Coup by a general, or secession by law abiding states?
Your inflammatory title is not going to incite violence only in my opinion because any real american aving been to el salvador are not supportive of accepting immigrants from it and wouldnt put selves in danger to support it
 
If the Supreme Court wants it done so bad maybe they should do it themselves
The Supreme courts ruling is sort of a riddle. These people all are mad hatters.

They ruled that the president must facilitate the return of an El Salvadorian citizen but El Savador isn't the jurisdiction of the United States. They also told the executive that they have to tell them just how they plan on doing that.
 
Under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes

To prove this, let Facts be submitted:

Trump deported an El Salvadorian citizen back to El Salvador
 
Last edited:
9-0 ruling to return a deportee. Trump says 'make me'.

Now that's what I call "checks and balances".

(In fact, "fuck you, no!" is the ne plus ultra of "checks and balances".)

The constitutional solution is the second amendment to get the executive back inside the rule of law...

"The rule of law" and "whatever the Supreme Court happens to say about something at any given moment" are not the same thing.

Otherwise its like.... a Coup by a general, or secession by law abiding states?

Why "law-abiding" states? I'm not really sure what that's even supposed to mean - but if anything, I'm probably even more in favor (if that's even possible) of secession by states that are law-unabiding.

It also occurs to me to wonder how those who endorse secession (or coups) - on grounds that POTUS has "unconstitutionally" flouted SCOTUS - will reconcile that with SCOTUS deciding that secessions (or coups) are not "law-abiding" or "constitutional" (as we all know they would).
 
The Supreme courts ruling is sort of a riddle. These people all are mad hatters.

They ruled that the president must facilitate the return of an El Salvadorian citizen but El Savador isn't the jurisdiction of the United States. They also told the executive that they have to tell them just how they plan on doing that.
He's not 'in El Salvador' he is being held in a prison at the expense of the United States. And the President explained clearly why he will be deporting citizens too.
 
They ruled he has to make it possible, EL Salvador said no, that's the end of it.

It was also a stupid and unconstitutional ruling almost as bad as the lower court ruling.

The coup is by the judicial branch and the President needs to tell them to go pound sand.
Activation of the 2nd would be the people taking the side of Trump and against the courts and their precious foreign invaders.
 
He's not 'in El Salvador' he is being held in a prison at the expense of the United States. And the President explained clearly why he will be deporting citizens too.
Deporting citizens to where?

Will he deport Californians back to California?

I could maybe support something like that.
 
In japanese lore the greatest punishment for a samurai was being reincarnated as a samurai.

Only an AI bot could consider that justification for trashing the Constitution.

Behold the Divide and Conquerbot.
 
Only an AI bot could consider that justification for trashing the Constitution.

Behold the Divide and Conquerbot.
"We the People" are the opening words of the United States Constitution. They signify that the power and legitimacy of the government stem from the citizens themselves, not from any higher authority.

You know the idea of deporting a US citizen living in California to California as a punishment was a joke right?

The president's power to deport comes from we the people. We the people elected him as president and transferred the power to him.
 
OP, I agree with what you're saying, in the sense, that the guy should be afforded due process.

Although, an issue that I've had for a long time, is with the body I call the Supreme Fraud.

While they have offered Constitutionally valid Opinions, I would argue that they exist primarily to rubber stamp government power grabs in violation of the Constitution.

Something that Thomas Jefferson opposed after Marbury v Madison, stating that they were never delegated the power of Judicial Review.

In many instances, the Supreme Fraud should be disregarded.
 
9-0 ruling to return a deportee. Trump says 'make me'.

The constitutional solution is the second amendment to get the executive back inside the rule of law...

Otherwise its like.... a Coup by a general, or secession by law abiding states?

You don't support the 2nd Amendment.

Leftists all the same. When they don't get their own way, they call for violence, and are more than willing to reverse on anything they have said before.
 
I'm just checking in on this forum after all of these years, to see if the supposedly "pro-constitution" "pro-liberty" forum was still in favor of checks and balances and due process.


And as it turns out, It's disputed, with the pro-executive-power faction appearing to have the edge.
 
Back
Top