Trump campaign chair: We’ll pick a white man for VP. Anything else would be “pandering.”

CPUd

Member
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
22,978
Trump campaign chair: We’ll pick a white man for VP. Anything else would be “pandering.”

Trump campaign chair: We’ll pick a white man for VP. Anything else would be “pandering.”

White men make up about 30.6 percent of the United States population. In 2012 they made up 35 percent of voters. But according to Donald Trump's campaign chair, white men make up 100 percent of people who could possibly be qualified to be vice president.

That's certainly the implication of what Trump campaign chair and chief strategist Paul Manafort told the Huffington Post's Howard Fineman in an article published Wednesday:

The campaign probably won’t choose a woman or a member of a minority group, he said. "In fact, that would be viewed as pandering, I think."

The assumption: The only reason someone might pick a woman or person of color for a job would be because they're a woman or person of color

There's a long tradition of presidential nominees using their vice presidential picks to pander to a particular constituency — though usually the constituency being pandered to isn't "women" or "Latino voters" but rather "voters from the VP nominee's home state, which happens to be a swing state in this election."

But Manafort — at least as presented in the Huffington Post article — isn't saying, We won't pick a VP nominee just because she checks the right boxes on race and gender. He's saying: Because we're not trying to check boxes on race and gender, we'll end up picking a vice president who's a white man.

That's a very different thing! That certainly implies that, to Manafort, the only reason you might end up picking a VP who happened to not be male or white would be because of her race or gender, not because of her qualifications. In other words, that if you rounded up all the people who are qualified in their own right to serve as President Trump's right-hand man, they would all be, well, white-handed men.

There aren't many nonwhite non-men qualified to be Trump's VP, because there aren't many human beings qualified to be Trump's VP

To be fair to Manafort, the bar for being "qualified" for the vice presidency is higher than usual when the man at the top of the ticket is Donald Trump. That's because, as Manafort admits elsewhere in the interview with Fineman, the job of Trump's VP will be to do the parts of the United States presidency Donald Trump "doesn't want to do":

"He needs an experienced person to do the part of the job he doesn’t want to do. He seems himself more as the chairman of the board, than even the CEO, let alone the COO."

This raises all kinds of much bigger questions about Trump's suitability for the presidency: what "the part of the job he doesn't want to do" is; how much of the job it entails; and why Donald Trump actually wants to be president of the United States to begin with. But as far as the VP search is concerned, it dovetails with comments Trump himself has made: that as someone with no experience in elected office, he wants a running mate who has spent time in government and knows how Washington works.

...

http://www.vox.com/2016/5/26/11784848/trump-vice-president-woman
 
"He needs an experienced person to do the part of the job he doesn’t want to do."

Why is even running, if he only wants to do part of the job? Sounds like a very bad work ethic... which I suppose we should expect from the son of a millionaire.
 
Why not just pick the best person for the job and don't GAF if they are red white black blue purple green, martian, or female?



What is being expressed here is an illogical and absurd leap of reason attempting to justify a real but unmentionable racial bias. What was said here could not have been said without working from a fundamental ontological assumption that whites and males will automatically be superior for the position, therefore the only reason to pick a minority or a female, is to pander. (not because they are the best qualified...that is left in the presumptive state of impossible by this argument)

So the speaker has to work from a presumption that it is impossible for a minority or a woman to be the best qualified, in order to state that the only reason to select a woman or a minority is pandering.

Everyone who knows me here knows that I do not fly off and gibber 'racism,' and I have barely said the word in re Trump except to describe some of the people that he attracts.

Now this statement in and of itself is pandering. It remains possible (probable?) that Trump Co means absolutely none of this disinformation. The statement itself is a pander to racists. It "identifies with their world" where blacks can't possibly be better. So maybe Manafort actually means what he said and has displayed a racial bias, or maybe Manafort is just pandering with this statement to reassure the people who DO have a racial bias, but either way this is one of the most obviously racially biased positions I have seen yet from Trump's camp. "Mexicans this and that" was really just hot noise. This statement, if issued in integrity, reveals a legitimate racial bias, and if issued as a pander, demonstrates a willingness to pander to the lowest common denominator.
 
Smart move. Trump's campaign knows what they are doing. A pander pick would get them NOTHING. The media would just say Trump picked them to distract from how "sexist/racist" he is. Trump understands the media must be defeated, it can not be mollified. If Rand had realized that he might still be in the race.
 
I don't want to click on the link but is there a full quote or is it simply a misleading title?
 
The assumption: The only reason someone might pick a woman or person of color for a job would be because they're a woman or person of color

Pretty accurate in politics, actually. Pretty accurate. What is Hillary's campaign? "Look at me, I'm a woman!" That's it. That's the sum total of her campaign.

Certainly there are exceptions. Walter Williams would make an awesome VP choice.
 
I don't want to click on the link but is there a full quote or is it simply a misleading title?

Comes from the Huffington Post.

Donald Trump's Top Adviser: 'This Is Not A Hard Race'
Paul Manafort explains why his boss is “gonna win,” no prob.
05/25/2016 08:39 pm ET | Updated 3 days ago

Howard Fineman
Global Editorial Director, The Huffington Post

Kevin Lamarque/Reuters
Donald Trump "sees himself more as the chairman of the board" of the country.

ALEXANDRIA, Va. -- Paul Manafort looks the part of a chairman: 67, well-coiffed, bespoke-suited and appropriately Rolexed. In the world of Donald Trump, that's his title: campaign chairman and chief strategist.

And as chairmen do, Manafort assured us that his enterprise will be crowned with success: Trump will beat Hillary Clinton soundly in November.

“He’s gonna win,” Manafort said over breakfast at a local diner called The Royal in Old Town Alexandria. “He's gonna win unless we -- meaning people like me -- screw it up. This is not a hard race.”

Why? In Manafort’s summary: Trump will remain Trump.

He may moderate a few views -- think Muslims -- but he won't and doesn't need to back down on anything. He probably won't pick a woman or a member of a minority group as a running mate because that would be “pandering.” He won’t win George W. Bush's levels of Latino support, but he will pick up enough Hispanic votes in key swing states. He won’t get the Bush family's support and doesn’t want it. Trump just has to be presidential enough in the first debate (no body parts mentioned), pick an experienced running mate, and run Clinton into the ground as a corrupt version of Barack Obama.

He'll win with white men and women, plus just enough of everyone else. Simple.

You don’t change Donald Trump. You don’t ‘manage’ him. Paul Manafort

Handlers usually undersell, but not Manafort and not now. Extra infusions of optimism are helpful to Trump at a time when some Republican leaders remain dubious, mega funders are scared by Trumpismo, and The Donald has the highest negatives of any party nominee in memory.

Manafort’s sunny vision may be a little skewed. Having made millions as an image crafter for foreign tyrants, he can’t help but see Trump as an easy lift by comparison. And his analysis deserves an extra measure of caution because no one ultimately speaks for Trump -- a point Manafort was quick to stress.

“You don’t change Donald Trump,” he said. “You don’t ‘manage’ him.”
Chris Usher/CBS Photo Archive via Getty Images
Paul Manafort is plotting the path to Trump's victory.

TrumpWorld is, in fact, a seething mosh pit of ambitious egos vying to influence Trump, who keeps them all at bay, milking them for advice, until he decides everything on his own -- often on a whim or in an odd-hour tweet.

But to the extent that there is a theory of and a plan for victory, it’s up to Manafort to devise them. He laid out his thinking for The Huffington Post between bites of egg-white omelet.

A Ban On Muslims: Democrats and many Republicans have hammered Trump on his call to bar Muslims from entering the U.S. until some unspecified future time when he deems it safe to do so.

“He’s already started moderating on that," Manafort said. "He operates by starting the conversation at the outer edges and then brings it back towards the middle. Within his comfort zone, he’ll soften it some more."

"He’ll still end up outside of the norm, but in line with what the American people are thinking."

Within his comfort zone, he’ll soften it some more. Manafort on Trump's Muslim strategy

That Wall: “He is going to build a wall. That is a core thing with him," Manafort said. "He will push it strongly, and he will push for the immigration changes just as strongly."

His Tax Returns: “I will be surprised if he puts them out. I wouldn’t necessarily advise him to. It’s not really an issue for the people we are appealing to. His tax returns are incredibly complicated. I wouldn’t understand them, so how are the American people going to? The financial disclosure he put out gives the salient points," Manafort said.

"The only people who want the tax returns are the people who want to defeat him."

The only people who want the tax returns are the people who want to defeat him. Manafort on why Trump doesn't need to release his returns

The GOP: It was never as divided, Manafort said, as it might have looked on the night Trump locked up the nomination with a primary victory in Indiana.

“That was all B.S.,” he said. “It was overblown. His negatives were going to drop when Republicans came home, and they are. The level of GOP support for Trump now is between 82 and 87 percent, and it is going to get to 90, 93."

“I’ve made three trips to the Hill and most of the people up there are getting with us, if they weren’t already,” he said. “There are some Senate candidates who aren’t sure Trump is in their interest yet, but they’ll come along.”

“The ‘never Trump’ movement was never going anywhere.” He’s right.

Latino Voters: The conventional view, espoused by the Bush family and its retainer Karl Rove, is that a GOP presidential candidate needs 40 percent of the nationwide Hispanic vote to win. Trump is at roughly 20 percent.

“The national polls are distorted,” Manafort said. “To get a national sample they rely too much on Hispanics from New York and California, which is where large populations are, but also where most of the radical Hispanics are."

“But if you look at Hispanics in states such as Ohio, Pennsylvania and even Florida, you see a different picture. We’re going to target Hispanic voters in those and other swing states."

“The message is going to be jobs, national security, terrorism, family values and education,” he said. “In that order."

“Their concerns are the same as the white working families."

So his candidate doesn't need 40 percent of Latino voters nationwide. “If we get into the high 20s in those states with Hispanics, we will win them, and in Florida we can do even better if we do what we need to do in the Cuban community.”

The Women: “Our numbers even now are not that far out of whack,” Manafort said. “We’re down 12 among women, but up 20 among men."

“Hillary is the one who’s got a gender gap. And while we are behind among women over all, we’re ahead among white women even now. We’ll get some black and Hispanic women as we go along.”

How He'll Campaign: “We’ll continue the rallies. That is Trump’s brand. We’ll do the broad themes at the big rallies. No one wants to change that."

But, Manafort added, the campaign will assemble a state-of-the-art social media and on-the-ground operation.

“He doesn’t want to spend the money on a big national campaign structure. He hears a figure like $500 million and says, ‘These are all people who are going to get rich.’ But I have reassured him that it will be a very lean operation.”

'Filling The Chair': “There are two main challenges. One is to make the American people look at him and say, ‘He can fill the chair.’"

“Does he know enough? Yes, because he knows he has more to learn. And he is constantly doing that.”

Trump doesn't read briefing papers, but he is a magnet for information, Manafort said. "He reads the newspapers, and he talks on the phone and to office visitors in a never-ending stream. You’re sitting there in his office and you realize that he is constantly picking up stuff as he goes."

“We have all this survey research, but he does his own soundings all the time, all day every day. And he’s more accurate," Manafort said.

The first presidential debate will be key. Needless to say, Trump won't hesitate to attack Clinton in that and other debates. Attack is and has always been his only mode.

“The idea of going at her doesn’t have to change,” said Manafort. “But it will matter how he says it.”

He needs an experienced person to do the part of the job he doesn’t want to do. Manafort on Trump's veep pick

The vice presidential pick will also be part of the process of proving he's ready for the White House, Manafort said.

“He needs an experienced person to do the part of the job he doesn’t want to do. He seems himself more as the chairman of the board, than even the CEO, let alone the COO."

“There is a long list of who that person could be," Manafort added, "and every one of them has major problems.”

The campaign probably won't choose a woman or a member of a minority group, he said. “In fact, that would be viewed as pandering, I think.”



No way he won't keep up the barrage against Hillary Clinton.

Attacking Hillary: The second challenge is to showcase Clinton's flaws in a way that doesn't drive away the independents.

There is little reason to worry that Trump's abrasive attacks will backfire, Manafort insisted. "He's not going to fundamentally change, though you have to say it right," he said.

The main message about Clinton will be that as president, she would be "Obama Three" but with worse ethics. The prospect of another term for the current administration will be enough to convince voters, the president's relatively strong recent job approval numbers notwithstanding.

No Bushes: “I think we’ll get other people coming aboard eventually, but probably not the Bushes -- and Trump can leave them alone,” said Manafort. "And we’re going to be above 90 percent Republican support without them."

“People don’t want dynasties. They want change.”
 
Does this mean Trump-Carson 2016 is a no go?

'







But news like in OP won't be too surprising considering these statements:

177fe1730fa37d6d57905cb37b64b0c4%2F565x0xwidth%2F75%2Fhttp%2Fblog.uloop.com%2Fuloop%2Fr%3D305%2Fpng%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F11%2Fdonald-trump-3-450x231.jpg


trump-nuke-tweet.jpg


trump-tweet-insane.png


trump-tweet-750x312.jpg
 
This just goes to show you that Trump supporters and the people that they hate are more similar than different.

SJWs will think it's unfair if a white man is selected.

Trumpers will think it's unfair if anyone but a white man is picked.

Both completely irrespective of the ability of the person themselves.
 
Yes this whole thing could have been avoided if all he said was, "we'll pick the best person for the job".
 
Well, yes, he said the ugly truth: that their base would react negatively to anyone other than a white man.

At least they're aware of their supporters' interests I guess.
 
You do not know what the question was that he was responding to. It could have been, for instance: "Is the campaign looking for a woman or minority to pick in order to balance the ticket and deflect the charges or racism and sexism that Mr. Trump has been facing?"

In fact, it was probably something like that.

As I write this now, I realize in fact the interviewer's question or statement was almost certainly something like this. This is the head honcho at the Huffington Post, after all. I mean, the Huffington Post. Come on.

And as a response to that, this would be perfectly sensible and reasonable, and we could all agree with it completely.

Seriously, the only actual quotation is a sentence fragment. A sentence fragment! (for demonstration purposes). From a hostile, far-leftist communist media outlet. Conclusions to draw from that? None.
 
How, exactly, is what I said racist?

You said it right here:
Well, yes, he said the ugly truth: that their base would react negatively to anyone other than a white man.

At least they're aware of their supporters' interests I guess.

No one said anything about Trump's base reacting to anyone other than a white man besides you and then you go on to infer that his supporters would only accept a white man.
 
Back
Top