Trump backed by blood consuming Bilderberger

[Weston White]

You came into a thread that was specifically created to talk about certain specific issues regarding Trump and instead of dealing with that topic all you want to talk about is whether Obama's dad was named Frank. The facts speak for themselves. You might not support Trump but apparently you don't care about the specific issues I raised. That or you are just trolling. Not sure.

So somebody is invalidated merely by those that come to support them? Rather unjustified, yes?


Medically sactioned blood transfusions by consenting adults: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...ng-people-s-blood-will-make-him-immortal.html

BFD.

 

[jmdrake]

I said nothing about Obama or his father, Drake. What I did point out was that Thiel also supported Ron Paul's run for President. Did you take issue with him doing that? Or, is it ok if he pours millions into helping a candidate that you like, but horrifying if he pours millions into helping a candidate that you don't?

I didn't say you said anything about Obama and his father LE. I was pointing out to you the purpose of this thread which is to point out obvious hypocrisy. And I'm glad you aren't willing to be a part of this hypocrisy. You do owe Ted Cruz an apology for jumping on the National Inqurier "he's a serial adulterer" bandwagon but that would be a different thread. Also, as I pointed out, Don Black also supported Ron Paul's campaign. But Ron Paul didn't have either Don Black or Peter Thiel introduce him to speak anywhere. Rand might have done that.....but that's Rand. Rand also flip flopped on the Bilderberg issue going from someone who said on camera "Yeah...that Bilderberg secret society stuff is concerning" to literally running from a reporter asking him the question. Anyway, Merry Christmas! I sincerely hope you don't have land that some business partner of Donald "eminent domain for private business" Trump wants.

 

[jmdrake]

So somebody is invalidated merely by those that come to support them? Rather unjustified, yes?

Only when the support is mutual. If Ron Paul had had Don Black introduce him to speak anywhere then the racist charges against Ron Paul would have been justified...but he didn't so they weren't.

 

[jmdrake]

Ok, so you are talking about parabiosis.

https://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/2016/12/20/vampire-therapy-can-blood-young-fight-aging/

Yep. You're just now figuring that out? Now the London Telegraph called that "Vampire therapy." Don't take my word for it. Actually read the link this time.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/sci...apy-could-reverse-ageing-scientists-find.html

And calling it "vampire therapy" is actually accurate. The who vampire mythology revolves around people seeking to extend life indefinitely by consuming the blood of the young. Only nobody knew about transfusions back then. There was a Babylon 5 episode called "Deathwalker." It surrounded the capture of an interstellar criminal nicknamed "Deathwalker" by her survivors. It turned out that she had discovered the secret of immortality. Only....in order to have enough of a supply....sentients had to die. Right now, despite the Red Cross always talking about "blood shortages", blood is cheap (comparatively). Get enough rich geezers wanting to extend their life indefinitely.... Or should life extension technology only be given to those who can afford it in a world of socialized medicine?



Of course everything could be perfectly innocent and end just smashingly. The free market could make sure there is just the right amount of supply for demand and Thiel doesn't have to kill to get his supply. And his membership in the Bilderberg group could be just so that he can "spy on the bad guys" as some people think. And Obama might just be embarrassed to have a dad named Frank. And Donald Trump could only use his king-like eminent domain powers to take land from people who really don't deserve to have it. And he might be putting a Navy SEAL over the interior department, which is the very department that would be responsible for eminent domain at the federal level, because....well Navy SEALs are just so efficient at whatever they do. The Bundy Ranchers and the Standing Rock protesters may have nothing to worry about. Then again....

 

[LibertyEagle]

I didn't say you said anything about Obama and his father LE. I was pointing out to you the purpose of this thread which is to point out obvious hypocrisy. And I'm glad you aren't willing to be a part of this hypocrisy. You do owe Ted Cruz an apology for jumping on the National Inqurier "he's a serial adulterer" bandwagon but that would be a different thread. Also, as I pointed out, Don Black also supported Ron Paul's campaign. But Ron Paul didn't have either Don Black or Peter Thiel introduce him to speak anywhere. Rand might have done that.....but that's Rand. Rand also flip flopped on the Bilderberg issue going from someone who said on camera "Yeah...that Bilderberg secret society stuff is concerning" to literally running from a reporter asking him the question. Anyway, Merry Christmas! I sincerely hope you don't have land that some business partner of Donald "eminent domain for private business" Trump wants.

Ron's campaign was a rounding error by the time the convention ran around. We have no idea who he would have had introduce him.

Low blow regarding Rand. What he did was tell that little ripoff POS 9-11 Truther asshole that he needed to make an appointment. Lukie's goal was to make Rand look like a conspiracy lunatic and was pissed off that Rand wouldn't give him a hangman's noose soundbyte. Sad to see that you're with Luke on that.

 

[jmdrake]

Ron's campaign was a rounding error by the time the convention ran around. We have no idea who he would have had introduce him.

I guarantee you it wouldn't have been Don Black and I doubt it would have been Peter Thiel. It's not like Ron didn't have other events he could have had either of them introduce him at. Hello? Rally for the Republic? The times Ron spoke at CPAC? You're grasping at straws LE.

Low blow regarding Rand. What he did was tell that little ripoff POS 9-11 Truther $#@! that he needed to make an appointment. Lukie's goal was to make Rand look like a conspiracy lunatic and was pissed off that Rand wouldn't give him a hangman's noose soundbyte. Sad to see that you're with Luke on that.

You're the one that brought Ron and Rand into this and you brought up the meeting Rand had with Thiel although you mis-attributed it to Ron. This thread has you super triggered for some odd reason and it's not defense of Ron or Rand Paul. Rand did a lot of stuff post meeting Peter Thiel that many of us would question including the endorsement of Mitt Romney, hinting that testimony from torture should be allowed and more recently voting for Iran sanctions. I still support Rand but I'm not going to pretend he's pure as the driven snow. Sometimes there is a price to pay for getting that type of power and access. Perhaps watering down the message a little was the price. Or maybe Rand just did it for the teocon votes. I dunno. At a certain level I don't even care. But if large segments of this movement are going to throw stones over whether or not someone's birth certificate should have read "Frank Davis" then we should be aware of our own glass house. I'm not a hypocrite. I won't be a hypocrite nor silently watch hypocrisy, like your condemning Ted Cruz over fake adultery stories while supporting someone who was already on record bragging about attempting to seduce married women and comparing that person to King David. Until you can own up to that "low blow" LibertyEagle, don't you dare try to lecture anyone else.

 

[nikcers]

I said nothing about Obama or his father, Drake. What I did point out was that Thiel also supported Ron Paul's run for President. Did you take issue with him doing that? Or, is it ok if he pours millions into helping a candidate that you like, but horrifying if he pours millions into helping a candidate that you don't?

Ron had a whole lot of people he didn't see eye to eye with "support" his campaign for president. We didn't support Ron Paul because Peter Thiel donated to his campaign. We supported Ron Paul because he put his entire life, his blood sweat and tears into trying to fix our country and teach people how to think.

 

[Firestarter]

Investigating what is really happening sometimes looks like I’m trying to put together a giant puzzle. Blood of the young to expand the life of the elite, certainly puts together some pieces (of this puzzle).
See the following quote from another thread.

An important confidant of Donald Trump is billionaire Peter Thiel, the cofounder of PayPal, that donated $1.25 million to his presidential campaign.
Earlier this month Donald Trump met with some high-tech CEO’s that were invited on the proposal of Thiel. Trump and Thiel even have a special (Masonic?) handshake: http://gizmodo.com/donald-trump-and-peter-thiel-attempt-handshake-high-fiv-1790108515

Peter Thiel is a member of the powerful Bilderberg group, but even more interesting is his interest in parabiosis: transfusions with the blood of young people to prolong the life of the elite.
The “Personal Health Director to Peter Thiel” has expressed interest in the technique of Jesse Karmazin, the founder of Ambrosia LLC, which is experimenting with blood transfusions from subjects younger than 25 to participants of more than 35 years old.
Peter Thiel has confirmed his interest in parabiosis: http://www.inc.com/jeff-bercovici/peter-thiel-young-blood.html

It seems unlikely that Peter Thiel will actually join the Donald Trump cabinet, because he is too busy. For example his quest to live forever - Stemcentrx and the Sens Foundation (of Aubrey de Grey) – takes a lot of time: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thiel_Foundation
Thiele is on the board of directors of more than a dozen companies. Some of the companies in which he invested considerably are: Facebook, Palantir, SpaceX, Airbnb, Zenefits, Lyft and Founders Fund: http://www.theverge.com/2016/11/16/...-house-conflict-of-interest-palantir-facebook

Parabiosis is nothing new; the following report from 1956 shows that there were already experiments to “retard” the aging process by parabiosis in the 1860s: “In his review of parabiosis, Finerty states that this joining of two rats by surgical operation was first used in Claude Ber-nard's laboratory by Paul Bert in the 1860's”. C.M. McCay et al, EXPERIMENTAL PROLONGATION OF THE LIFE SPAN (1956): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1805858/pdf/bullnyacadmed00383-0015.pdf

Already more than 2000 years ago the blood of gladiators and virgins was consumed in ancient Greece, while in Renaissance Europe the blood of young men was preferred. Leonardo da Vinci once stated that “we preserve our life with the death of others”.
In the winter of 1668 the English Edward Browne was touring Vienna. He saw a public execution where a man filled his pot with the fresh blood spouting from the neck of an executed man to drink it.
A recipe from a Franciscan apothecary from 1679 provides instructions for making blood marmalade: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...ng-people-s-blood-will-make-him-immortal.html

While I thought that the elite only wants children for sick (satanic) sex, blood rituals it’s not as crazy as it seems.
Recently there have been some experiments on rats that confirm that blood of the young slows down the aging process (in the older rats). See the following article from 2014: https://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/05/science/young-blood-may-hold-key-to-reversing-aging.html?_r=1
Since 2014 there has been done similar research; the most advanced studies in China and Korea.

 

[H. E. Panqui]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aw3QSziyV0E

...the drake is good...he seems to have an uncanny knack to agitate trumpswabs...mixing humor, wordplay, innuendo, etc..good stuff!...love it!...

...and i must say, i too am surprised by the number of apologists here for the apparent goddamned republican fool/puppet trump...