Trump backed by blood consuming Bilderberger

jmdrake

Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Messages
51,960
Alright. To everyone who claims that are so interested in "the truth" that they will carry on and on about the birth certificate of Obama who is about to be out of the Whitehouse anyway and who, according to the conspiracy within the conspiracy, is a natural born citizen who's father was not Kenyan but American, I have one question for you. Are you going to shine the light of "truth" against people you support?

For decades Alex Jones has railed against the "luciferian elite" who engage in bizarre rituals, are obsessed with "life extension technology", belong to secret societies like the Bilderberg group, and drink human blood. Where here's a sensationalist headline for you that is actually true. And guess who accidentally gave it to me? Trump pimp Alex Jones. Or more precisely I got it from Alex Jones leutinant Paul Joseph Watson. You see to "prove" that Donald Trump really isn't a racist homophobe (and that's true, Trump is not a racist homophobe because if he wasn't he wouldn't be caught dead with Kanye West who rapped in a dress), Paul Joseph Watson made this video.



Oh everybody is supposed to be soooo happy that Donald Trump is at the RNC waiving the LGBTQABCDEFG flag because Trump is going to protect gays from evil Muslims and conservative Christians by taking away religious freedom. Okay, Watson left out the taking away religious freedom bit. But Paul Joseph Watson channeled his inner Rachel Maddow by attacking Ted Cruz for being on stage with a pastor who called for the execution of gays. ONLY THAT IS A BOLDFACED LIE! THAT PASTOR NEVER CALLED FOR THE EXECUTION OF GAYS! HE MERELY QUOTED THE BIBLE WHERE IT ACTUALLY DOES CALL FOR THAT BUT THEN SAID HE WANTED GAYS AND ADULTERERS AND DIVORCEES TO REPENT! That lie had been completely debunked here on RonPaulForums.com but fake "truth seeker" Paul Joseph Watson ran with it based on nothing but the out of context clip that Rachel Maddow used in her rant. Here is the thread where I debunked the lying Rachel Maddow.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...iberal-media-busted-Anti-gay-pastor-did-NOT-c

all-for-execution-of-gays&highlight=cruz+pastor+execution

I never in a million years believed a top Alex Jones commentator would on Infowars.com repeat the samie lie, but it has happened. Alex Jones and Infowars.com have totally sold out the Christian conservative wing of the liberty movement. Oh....but it gets worse. Paul Joseph Watson also went to great pains to point out that gays should be happy that Donald Trump was introduced at the RNC by Peter Thiel. But who is Peter Thiel? Well he is the Paypal.com billionaire. He's also an open member of the Bilderberg group.



Now, it's not like Infowars.com isn't aware of this. They carried the story!

http://www.infowars.com/peter-thiel-bilderberg-groups-lack-of-transparency-is-a-good-thing/

Yet when Paul Joseph Watson highlighted Peter Thiel introducing Trump at the RNC, all he could talk about was the fact that Peter Thiel is a openly gay republican because, of course, being gay is all that matters about a person right? I didn't know Infowars.com backed LBGTQABCDEFG affirmative action. What I have not heard Alex "the elites consume human blood and are obsessed with life extension technology" Jones talk about is the fact that Peter Thiel consumes blood preciesely because he's obsessed with life extension technology. Well here, you heard it from me. Actually you heard it from Forbes.com, Inc.com, Vanity Fair.com and countless other mainstream media sources.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=peter+thiel+blood

Oh, and the blood needs to be from young people, preferably 18 years old. (I'm guessing he'd prefer younger but you have to be 18 to sell your blood). Why? Because Thiel believes taking blood transfusions from young people may be the key to immortality. Now, where have we heard that before? If you are thinking "vampire novels" you are correct. In the vampire mythology the prefered blood was that of a virgin. What do virgins tend to be? Why they are usually young people. Creeped out yet? No? Is that your cognitive dissoance kicking in?

Oh.....but Peter Thiel backed Rand Paul. Yes he did! And what did he get for his backing? Why the younger Paul went from attacking the Bilderberg group to litterally running away from the question. And of course Rand Paul ultimately endorsed Mitt Romney after being backed by Peter Thiel.



Hmmmm.....was the price of Peter Thiel's backing the event that caused a split in the liberty movement that is still being felt to this day? Did that event cost Rand Paul the vital energetic support he really needed this year to propel him to the top tier of the GOP primary? And who did Peter Thiel and Alex Jones switch their allegiences to while Rand Paul was still in the race? Why it was Donald J. Trump!

Oh....but it gets worse. Right before Trump gets elected, Alex Jones finds himself marginalized (castrated really) by Pizzagate. Alex "false flag" Jones can't talk about the obvious false flag of some dude walking into a Pizza joint in Washington D.C. which is frequented by the elite to "investigate" a story Alex Jones was talking about, and firing a gun and not getting shot by trigger happy D.C. police and this person was supposedly triggered by listening to Alex Jones. So Joe Biggs gets fired from/quits Infowars.com and Alex Jones finds himself on his own show being "lectured" by a "witness" who supposedly didn't hear the shot that was supposedly fired.



Will a damaged Alex Jones turn his muckraking journalism operation against the real Teflon Don? Will he look into the background of the Navy SEAL that Donald Trump has picked to overee the interior department? And you ask why does that matter? Think about it. Which department was the Bundy Rebellion really going against? Which department are the Standing Rock protestors going against? The interior department! A special forces operator is being put over the very federal department that armed and unarmed protestors have been going against the most! Oh, and Donald J. Trump has a financial interest in the proposed pipeline that's at the heart of the Standing Rock controversy!

So, will Alex Jones and other "truth seekers" seek the truth when it comes to Donald J. Trump? I think we already have the answer to that. Jones is going to carry Trump water until every it reaches its final destination or until every drop spills out. And people want to obsess over the birth certificate of an outgoing president who even according to a large segment of the "birther" conspiracy theoriests is a natural born U.S. citizen. Give me a break! You say you want the truth?

 
Last edited:
Well that was inspired, interesting reading at the break of dawn jmdrake.

Thanks. :o I've been sitting on this for awhile. Well I just found out about Jones getting spanked about Pizzagate but I knew about Peter Thiel's obsession with "young blood" before the election of Trump and saw the deishonest Paul Joseph Watson video right after Trump was elected. There's stuff I know that I'm not revealing as well. I miss Interested Participant. It turns out he was right....about everything. :( (That said face is both because he's not an active forum participant anymore and the fact that I hate the fact that he was right because that means we are screwed.)
 
So what is the truth? Nobody's perfect?;)

The truth is that people who care about liberty have much more to be concerned about regarding an incoming president Trump than they do an outgoing president Obama. I question the sincerity of people who are even now obsessing over Obama's birth certificate yet either openly support Trump or at the very least are being silent about the clear and present danger we face from Trump. We can joke about it, but it's no laughing matter. Say if Trump actually activates the plans the NWO has been putting into place? Who's going to stand against him when half of the liberty movement is enthralled with him? The MSM? They discount the "conspiarcy theories" outright. In two words....we're screwed. Welcome to the party. We're on the menu.
 
You do know that Thiel gave a great deal of money to Ron when he was running, right?
 
You do know that Thiel gave a great deal of money to Ron when he was running, right?

White supremacist Don Black gave Ron Paul money too. I doubt Ron would have had Don Black introduce him at the RNC. :rolleyes: Now do you want to talk about Donald Trump's financial interest in the Standing Rock pipeline, the fact that Donald Trump openly pushed the anti Christian gay pride agenda at the RNC and the fact that Trump is putting a Navy SEAL over the department of the interior? Let's see how the next Bundy Ranch type showdown goes down.
 
White supremacist Don Black gave Ron Paul money too. I doubt Ron would have had Don Black introduce him at the RNC. :rolleyes: Now do you want to talk about Donald Trump's financial interest in the Standing Rock pipeline, the fact that Donald Trump openly pushed the anti Christian gay pride agenda at the RNC and the fact that Trump is putting a Navy SEAL over the department of the interior? Let's see how the next Bundy Ranch type showdown goes down.

He gave quite a bit more than Don Black. lolol. Plus, as I recall, he met with RAND privately.

As far as the pipeline goes, I believe Trump owns some shares in Energy Transfer Partners. I do too, by the way. He will likely need to sell it before he becomes President.
 
Last edited:
He gave quite a bit more than Don Black. lolol.

:rolleyes: Peter Thiel probably pays more in taxes than Don Black makes in a year. Nice try at a dodge though.

Plus, as I recall, he met with him privately as to where to best put his money.

Maybe that's why Ron Paul decided not to attack Mitt Romney. Who knows? Peter Thiel is still a blood consuming Bilderberger and Donald Trump is still pushing the gay marriage agenda which will take away your religious freedom. But you probably don't even care about that.

As far as the pipeline goes, I believe Trump owns some shares in Energy Transfer Partners. I do too, by the way. He will likely need to sell it before he becomes President.

Trump already said he's not divesting anything but instead he's putting his children over his holdings and technically the law doesn't force him to divest. Now, Navy SEAL over the interior department? Get ready Bundy Ranchers. Donald "I love eminent doman for private business" Trump is gunning for you! Oh but Trump supposedly is against the TPP so that doesn't matter either. And Trump told Hannity the wall will be built only to keep the drugs out but the people will be coming over legally. All hail herr Trump!
 
If you were worried about RPF members coming across as nutty by discussing the birth certificate issue, well, that worry is no longer a concern, because this thread just took the cake, baked it, and served it up moist and extra frosty.
 
If you were worried about RPF members coming across as nutty by discussing the birth certificate issue, well, that worry is no longer a concern, because this thread just took the cake, baked it, and served it up moist and extra frosty.

Right. Because the truth is nutty. :rolleyes: That just proves you have been totally coopted. Debunk anything I have said and I will personally donate $100 to the Donald J. Trump innaguration fund. But you can;t because everything I said is 100% true and backed up by actual verified source material. You make me sick. You are just like the republicans who couldn't deal with 9/11 Truth because "Bush couldn';t do any wrong." Any conspiracy theory, no matter how tenously based on fact, it okay as long as it goes against someone you don't like whether it's Barack Obama or Ted Cruz. (Yes sicko Trumpskiites pushed the false Ted Cruz adultery bullshyt too.) But tell the truth about Trump and the people backing him? Oh that's "nutty." For everyone who can't handle the truth when it's about Donald Trump.....

 
If you were worried about RPF members coming across as nutty by discussing the birth certificate issue, well, that worry is no longer a concern, because this thread just took the cake, baked it, and served it up moist and extra frosty.

I don't like eating frozen cake.
 
If you were worried about RPF members coming across as nutty by discussing the birth certificate issue, well, that worry is no longer a concern, because this thread just took the cake, baked it, and served it up moist and extra frosty.

I have to admit I had trouble following along. I think it went so deep I came out on the other side and now I'm just drifting off towards another planet.
 
:rolleyes: Peter Thiel probably pays more in taxes than Don Black makes in a year. Nice try at a dodge though.
No dodge. Fact.
https://lmgtfy.com/?q="ron+Paul",+"peter+thiel"

And he met with Rand privately.

Maybe that's why Ron Paul decided not to attack Mitt Romney. Who knows?
So now Ron is a sellout in your mind?

Peter Thiel is still a blood consuming Bilderberger
:rolleyes:
Looked this up. The research is actually interesting.

and Donald Trump is still pushing the gay marriage agenda which will take away your religious freedom.
He doesn't want to hang them all, no.

But you probably don't even care about that.
No, I am not at all interested in pitching gays off the top of tall buildings.

Trump already said he's not divesting anything but instead he's putting his children over his holdings and technically the law doesn't force him to divest.
You're against him adhering to the law?

Now, Navy SEAL over the interior department? Get ready Bundy Ranchers. Donald "I love eminent doman for private business"
I don't think anyone here ever said they agreed with him on everything, but do carry on.

Trump is gunning for you! Oh but Trump supposedly is against the TPP so that doesn't matter either. And Trump told Hannity the wall will be built only to keep the drugs out but the people will be coming over legally. All hail herr Trump!
You are misconstruing what he has said. Like usual. But, we shall see.
 
Last edited:
I have to admit I had trouble following along. I think it went so deep I came out on the other side and now I'm just drifting off towards another planet.

Cliff notes version. Alex Jones built his career attacking the very people that Peter Thiel represents but then Alex Jones' lackey Paul Joseph Watson held Thiel's backing of Trump up as proof that "we can all trust Trump" because Thiel is openly gay. Then on top of it Paul Joseph Watson repeated the Rachel Maddow lie that Ted Cruz was on stage with a pastor who "Called for the execution of gays" when that is a dishonest clipping of what that pastor said.

So "truth seeker" Alex Jones is carrying Trump's water. Jones has been neutralized by Pizzagate. Nobody of any status will be keeping Donald Trump accountable the way infowars used to keep Clinton, Bush and then Obama accountable. Understand now?
 
lolol. Alex Jones lost credibility a LONG time ago. Just because you finally figured out that he is a stooge, don't get all freaked out.
 

It's a dodge and a dishonest one at that. Peter Thiel gave more money because he could give more money. So your point doesn't mean shyt. But that's typical for you.

And Ron met with him to plan where best Thiel could donate money to help Ron.

That's nice. Ron still didn't have Thiel introduce him at the RNC or anywhere else that I can think of. I guess Thiel got more bang for his buck for donating to Trump.

So now Ron is a sellout in your mind?

I never said Ron was a sellout. I did say back when Ron didn't attack Mitt Romney that this was suspicious. Doug Wead, who had inside knowledge, said in effect that Mitt Romney punked Ron by threatening to bury him with negative advertising. Who knows? But you are the one that keeps trying to make a false equivalency between Peter Thiel introducing Donald Trump at the RNC and Donald Trump embracing Peter Thiel's LGBTQABCDEFG agenda and Ron Paul merely meeting with Thiel privately to see how Thiel's money could best be used in the primary. LibertyEagle are you now pro LGBTQABCDEFG? You shamelessly and dishonestly attacked Ted Cruz during the primary. Is there something you are not telling the rest of us?

:rolleyes:
Looked this up. The research is actually interesting.

Sure. So is research into RFIDs and chipping. So is research into transhumanism and chimeras. There is a lot of "interesting research" going on. Infowars used to warn specifically about elites going to secret meeting like Bilderberg to discuss what to do with the rest of us "cattle" while they developing life extension technology for themselves. And here comes the exact type of person Alex Jones warned everyone about and Infowars is kissing his ass just because he's gay and supports Trump.

He doesn't want to hang them all, no.

More than that. Donald Trump supports gay marriage. I guess you do now to since you seem to have a problem thinking for yourself. But Trump also listed "religious views on homosexuality" as a screening criteiria. That's a broad brush and includes the pastor that infowars.com lied about who does not want to kill gays. Donald Trump's own church supports ordaining gay ministers. And they have a right to do that. But what is coming down the pipe, and is already in the works in California, is legislation that will prevent private institutions, including Christian colleges and universities, from having any sort of "morality clause" because that's supposedly "anti gay." Will Trump roll back Obama's "Let every child use the bathroom that he/she thinks he/she should use at the moment" agenda? Good money says....no. But you'll be a-okay with that won't you?

No, I am not at all interested in pitching gays off the top of tall buildings.

Who is? Ted Cruz is not. The pastor that infowars.com attacked dishonestly is not. You used to care about honesty but apparently Trumpitis got to you.

You're against him adhering to the law?

More Trumpitis. You were the one who said Trump should divest. Are you so stupid that you believe if Trump divests he will not be adhering to the law? So you think that someone who doesn't commit adultery is not adhering to the law simply because adultery is no longer a punishible crime? You have an interesting view of "adhering to the law."

I don't think anyone here ever said they agreed with him on everything, but do carry on.

That's not the issue. People are obsessing over the veracity of the birth certificate of an outgoing president while not properly vetting the incoming presidernt. To be fair you weren't in the birth certificate thread. But you did spend a lot of time and energy attacking Ted Cruz based on a fake adultery story. Oh but Donald "grab em by the pussy" and "I try to seduce married women" Trump is like David. :rolleyes:

You are misconstruing what he has said. Like usual. But, we shall see.

I'm not misconstruing anything. You just can handle the truth as usual. And someone who lied like you just did and misconstured my saying that the law doesn't make Donald Trump divest means that I don't want Trump to adhere to the law has some gall accusing me of misconstruing anything.
 
lolol. Alex Jones lost credibility a LONG time ago. Just because you finally figured out that he is a stooge, don't get all freaked out.

The funny think is you are now carrying Alex Jones water with your stupid comments insinuating that those who don't agree with Trump want to throw gays off of buildings. Are you aready to apolgize to Ted Cruz yet?
 
If you were worried about RPF members coming across as nutty by discussing the birth certificate issue, well, that worry is no longer a concern, because this thread just took the cake, baked it, and served it up moist and extra frosty.

Strange that certain people seem to have discovered the power of critical thinking when the nutty conspiracy at hand happens to be about Trump instead of Obama.
 
Strange that certain people seem to have discovered the power of critical thinking when the nutty conspiracy at hand happens to be about Trump instead of Obama.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to TheCount again.

Yeah...except this time there is no "theory" involved. I was careful not to stretch the truth even in the slightest. Alex Jones would have called Peter Thiel a "blood drinking satanist" if Thiel had backed Clinton or Obama. But when someone comes foward who is the epitome of everything we were supposed to be concerned about, all of a sudden it's all gravy.
 
Back
Top