buffalokid777
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 1,704
It appears the dems are pulling anti war independents from Ron Paul based on Iowa despite their shaky anti-war credentials.
I believe Ron Paul needs to challenge Obama's anti war credential and they're desire for change loudly and publically and in ads. He has superior anti-war credentials to Clinton, Obama, and Edwards.
Obama is getting the majority of the anti war independents who want a change. He says he was against the war but didnt have a vote. Ron Paul did have a vote and voted against it. Obama likes to sell himself as the change candidate, but by taking large amounts of special interest money unlike Ron Paul, his actions can be portrayed as a new political face, but business as usual in washington if he is elected by all that special interest money.
New Hampshire is a state with an open primary, we can do very well here, but if we don't make a push between now and Tuesday for those anti war independents, Obama stands to get many that Ron Paul could have got if Ron Paul can convince NH independents that he will end the war if elected, but Obama may say he was against the war, but unlikely he will bring the troops home anytime soon if elected.
We need Indpendents in NH, but a late push is needed to pull the anti war independents from Obama to Ron Paul, please consider a weekend ad blitz trying to accomplish this. The money invested in xtra New Hamphire ads might be enough to put us over the top and reap the $30,000,000 in free publicity for winning New Hampshire. If there's one place we should spend some xtra money to pull in independents it is New Hampshire.
I believe Ron Paul needs to challenge Obama's anti war credential and they're desire for change loudly and publically and in ads. He has superior anti-war credentials to Clinton, Obama, and Edwards.
Obama is getting the majority of the anti war independents who want a change. He says he was against the war but didnt have a vote. Ron Paul did have a vote and voted against it. Obama likes to sell himself as the change candidate, but by taking large amounts of special interest money unlike Ron Paul, his actions can be portrayed as a new political face, but business as usual in washington if he is elected by all that special interest money.
New Hampshire is a state with an open primary, we can do very well here, but if we don't make a push between now and Tuesday for those anti war independents, Obama stands to get many that Ron Paul could have got if Ron Paul can convince NH independents that he will end the war if elected, but Obama may say he was against the war, but unlikely he will bring the troops home anytime soon if elected.
We need Indpendents in NH, but a late push is needed to pull the anti war independents from Obama to Ron Paul, please consider a weekend ad blitz trying to accomplish this. The money invested in xtra New Hamphire ads might be enough to put us over the top and reap the $30,000,000 in free publicity for winning New Hampshire. If there's one place we should spend some xtra money to pull in independents it is New Hampshire.