Third Planned Parenthood Video Shows Aborted Baby Parts

They have been doing this for a very long time...Thank God some people with a conscience is exposing them!
 
Friend of mine just told me not to watch the video. I don't need to see it to understand the brutality and amoral nature of the procedure.
 
Friend of mine just told me not to watch the video. I don't need to see it to understand the brutality and amoral nature of the procedure.

Its ok and sfw, they aren't human parts.

Not until they get to the lab, anyway.
 
Screen-Shot-2015-07-27-at-3.11.33-PM-576x800.png
 
Talk to the average black citizen and this will totally go right over their head. It's like an inside joke that they aren't in on.

That's why propaganda and emotion trump arguments. The imagery and verbal spin create a framework that is hard to rationally overcome, unless you wage a counter-infowar to displace the mindset. Supporters of legal abortion have succeeded in perpetuating a dialogue on the issue built on abstractions and bloodless euphemisms like "reproductive health" or "choice," that keeps the substance of what abortion actually involves (burning, dismembering, and trading dead unborn children) out of the picture.

The PP videos bring us back to the concrete lethal reality that abortion involves killing, then disposing of real body parts---which with time, and more staggered video releases, will change the rhetoric and emotion on the issue, including black audiences.
 
Last edited:
That's why propaganda and emotion trump arguments. The imagery and verbal spin create a framework that is hard to rationally overcome, unless you wage a counter-infowar to displace the mindset. Supporters of legal abortion have succeeded in perpetuating a dialogue on the issue built on abstractions and bloodless euphemisms like "reproductive health" or "choice," that keeps the substance of what abortion actually involves (burning, dismembering, and trading dead unborn children) out of the picture.

The PP videos bring us back to the concrete lethal reality that abortion involves killing, then disposing of real body parts---which with time, and more staggered video releases, will change the rhetoric and emotion on the issue, including black audiences.

Actually, it takes no propaganda to understand why people are not outraged by what PP does. For ones, self inflicted harm is always seem as more desirable that outsider inflicted harm. Nobody is ever forced to use the services of PP, in fact they help people out when they are in a jam. Confederacy on the other hand where cool with African Americans being held in bondage working as slaves.

To use a different example, smoking and obesity related diseases would one day be responsible for more deaths than deaths due to the slave trade but nobody would ever compare the two or choose slavery over smoking or overeating because they were responsible for deaths. People will always choose self determination over slavery because it is the most rational thing to do.

Doesn't ever require any propagandizing
 
I don't need a nanny, I instead choose the one that lets me make decision for myself. Do you know which one does that?
Do they choose to let other people make decisions for themselves? Such as the countless who would not fund such a wicked establishment-- do they have the choice to make a decision for themselves?

Or is it just you?

I normally don't bring up race as it is more often than not irrelevant but I'll go ahead and ask this: As a black man, are you aware of the founding of PP and of its founder, Margaret Sanger? Why would you choose either?

And especially on the basis of whether or not a woman ought be able to destroy (murder) her fetus (baby/child). What would make it different if the child was a day old? Or a month? Her choice, right?
 
I can't watch it honestly and staerker....seriously...was that necessary.

I am not one to post graphic images.

But at some point, enough is enough.

If the government is going to fund it, and if our culture is going to celebrate it, then every single breathing human being should look at it long and hard.
 
I drive by Planned Parts for Sale Parenthood on my way to work. Usually a few protesters, but today many cars and people with "volunteer security" shirts on.

Next time I see that, I'll pull over and inquire what they get for a baby's heart.
 
Do they choose to let other people make decisions for themselves? Such as the countless who would not fund such a wicked establishment-- do they have the choice to make a decision for themselves?

Or is it just you?

I normally don't bring up race as it is more often than not irrelevant but I'll go ahead and ask this: As a black man, are you aware of the founding of PP and of its founder, Margaret Sanger? Why would you choose either?

And especially on the basis of whether or not a woman ought be able to destroy (murder) her fetus (baby/child). What would make it different if the child was a day old? Or a month? Her choice, right?

Ofc I don't agree with the forced funding of PP, but that is govt for you. There are a myriad of programs funded by the US govt that I do not agree with and I do know we are never going to stop funding all of em. The question I asked that you seemed to have conveniently answered with a question is this "which of those 2 symbols support my right of self determination?" PP or the confederacy.

Also the founding of PP makes very little difference to me, the Grand wizard of the KKK could be performing the abortions himself and all I would care about is this, is there force involved? if no, then it doesn't matter to me. In the absence of a contract, I think women are the ultimate gatekeepers when it comes to reproduction, they have the final say whether a baby comes to term. If you happen to make a baby with a woman, make sure you kiss her ass and love her very well so that she doesn't ever think of aborting your kid.

If you fail in this, then its your problem not the woman's. My philosophy is generally on minding my own business unless I am invited by victim or perpetrator to intervene, so extrapolate that philosophy as much as you want for 1 day old babies and such. Is crying an invitation to help? I am not quite sure, it depends.
 
My philosophy is generally on minding my own business unless I am invited by victim or perpetrator to intervene, so extrapolate that philosophy as much as you want for 1 day old babies and such. Is crying an invitation to help? I am not quite sure, it depends.

??? That is a very odd position. What about situations where the victim is completely unable to "invite?"

Perpetrator is sniping. Victim is blindfolded and gagged. Victim is a 1 day-old baby.
 
??? That is a very odd position. What about situations where the victim is completely unable to "invite?"

Perpetrator is sniping. Victim is blindfolded and gagged. Victim is a 1 day-old baby.

Actually its not that odd when you really think about it, "What about situations where the victim is completely unable to "invite?" then hopefully, they would be able to invite someone else or even better invite security for help. I can't be responsible for saving all of humanity, some people would slip through whatever safety system we have.

Not speaking from experience :D but you can still make a lot of distress call even while being gagged. So when an invitation comes, I would assess if it warrants my intervention. I truly think that is the most peaceful and most libertarian way of interacting with the world.
 
Ofc I don't agree with the forced funding of PP, but that is govt for you. There are a myriad of programs funded by the US govt that I do not agree with and I do know we are never going to stop funding all of em.
Okay. Fair enough.

The question I asked that you seemed to have conveniently answered with a question is this "which of those 2 symbols support my right of self determination?" PP or the confederacy.
No, what you asked was, "I don't need a nanny, I instead choose the one that lets me make decision for myself. Do you know which one does that?"

"Conveniently" faulty quotation at best.

I answered, "Why would you choose either?"

As in, neither offer self-determination. That is with regards to your view of the Confederacy taken at face value and the destruction of black lives through the founding and funding of PP.

Oh, they offer self-determined solutions for mothers wishing to abort their babies? Well, that is hardly something to promote or tout as some free or righteous act.

Also the founding of PP makes very little difference to me, the Grand wizard of the KKK could be performing the abortions himself and all I would care about is this, is there force involved? if no, then it doesn't matter to me.
They crush baby's skulls and harvest the organs and tissue. Is there not force involved?


In the absence of a contract, I think women are the ultimate gatekeepers when it comes to reproduction, they have the final say whether a baby comes to term. If you happen to make a baby with a woman, make sure you kiss her ass and love her very well so that she doesn't ever think of aborting your kid.
And you all (generically) apparently believe to have the final say as to whether or not I support the murder of said woman's child.

If you fail in this, then its your problem not the woman's. My philosophy is generally on minding my own business unless I am invited by victim or perpetrator to intervene, so extrapolate that philosophy as much as you want for 1 day old babies and such. Is crying an invitation to help? I am not quite sure, it depends.
That is just incredible.

Yet I am unsurprised.
 
Back
Top