The Last Chance for Michael Nystrom

jabowery

Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2007
Messages
175
With DailyPaul.com traffic plummeting, this is Michael Nystrom's last chance to avert further damage to conservatism:

A site that directly competes with liberty-hostile Jim Robinson's site, FreeRepublic.com, must be set up immediately and Michael Nystrom must redirect all DailyPaul.com traffic to it.

First of all, you have to understand that the liberty movement's recent progress is primarily a result of the Internet. Ron Paul was the beneficiary of this because he was the best man for the focus of that movement, but he was not its cause.

FreeRepublic.com is first and foremost a general news site that has the highest traffic for conservatives who are sharing news with each other. All higher ranking sites are run by major media companies such as Fox.

Jim Robinson, the owner of FreeRepublic.com, has a history of openly vicious censorship toward the liberty movement going back to 2007. He started going silent about his hatred only when it became apparent that Ron Paul's candidacy was a force to be reckoned with this year. He is still vicious and will continue to be so.

The primary feature of FreeRepublic.com is the front page general news and whatever competitor Nystrom redirects traffic to must have a similarly-functioning front page.

I invite you to examine Alexa's rankings for DailyPaul.com vs FreeRepublic.com vs RedState.com paying particular attention to the fact that DailyPaul.com was behind both of these sites prior to the presidential election cycle and is likely to return to only slightly higher than where it was. However, at present, it is still nipping at the heels of FreeRepublic.com.

Please, don't send a link to this to Michael Nystrom. He dislikes me personally and has previously rejected this idea by denying that the "network effect" (people go where they know they can find other people so you have a positive feedback effect that stabilizes control) puts him in a particularly responsible position. He's wrong and someone with better political/personal abilities than I, and better relations with him, must convince him otherwise before this opportunity disappears.
 
Last edited:
I really think it is a bizarre idea for us to tell Michael what he should do with the daily paul.

Personally, I want it to stay the daily paul.
 
Lol you want to basically shut his website down, and have it redirect to a news syndication site? Go away
 
Someone really needs to mow my lawn. It is getting out of hand and someone with more knowledge of my mower, and more motivation to mow should definitely do it before it gets any taller. Please PM me for directions to my house.
 
If these responses represent the uniform character of those in a position to act, then the necons win a major battle.
 
From Michael Nystrom at http://www.dailypaul.com/238476/ope...-paul-go-from-here-im-going-to-china&from=lbp

"...But in light of the recent news - Ron Paul's email, and now Rand endorsing Romney - I realize it is incredibly unfair to the moderators, who do such wonderful work with such a thankless task. So expect a little chaos on the site over the next couple of days. The front page might not get updated as much. A lively and spirited debate is likely to ensue. But a little chaos is good, every once in a while.

But this brings up a point I've been thinking quite a bit about and would like your feedback on: The future of the Daily Paul. The Liberty movement is big and sprawling, and the only thing holding this faction together is Ron Paul. And now we are seeing it start to blow apart. People are canceling their subscriptions in droves. Traffic on the site peaked back in January. Ron Paul is retiring from Congress next year.

Does it make sense to go on with a site called the Daily Paul? What began as a search for truth has led us here. I'm not much interested in leading the masses into the Republican party. The Campaign for Liberty and YAL are professional political organizations that will no doubt carry on in that role. I understand that is the path for some, and I respect that. It is not the path for me, and I hope those who disagree will be gracious enough to respect that as well. This site will not become the Daily Rand.

But what will become of this awesome community? Is this the end? What direction should the community take from here?..."

I don't see how the OP's post is bizarre. Maybe he didn't explain the situation thoroughly. Nystrom has asked for suggestions.

And even if he didn't...what's bizarre about trying to hold the DailyPaul's members together AND compete with an enemy of liberty?
 
a new site could start that. the daily paul is what people go to, what makes you think they would go there? And why lose the daily paul?
 
From Michael Nystrom at http://www.dailypaul.com/238476/ope...-paul-go-from-here-im-going-to-china&from=lbp

"...But in light of the recent news - Ron Paul's email, and now Rand endorsing Romney - I realize it is incredibly unfair to the moderators, who do such wonderful work with such a thankless task. So expect a little chaos on the site over the next couple of days. The front page might not get updated as much. A lively and spirited debate is likely to ensue. But a little chaos is good, every once in a while.

But this brings up a point I've been thinking quite a bit about and would like your feedback on: The future of the Daily Paul. The Liberty movement is big and sprawling, and the only thing holding this faction together is Ron Paul. And now we are seeing it start to blow apart. People are canceling their subscriptions in droves. Traffic on the site peaked back in January. Ron Paul is retiring from Congress next year.

Does it make sense to go on with a site called the Daily Paul? What began as a search for truth has led us here. I'm not much interested in leading the masses into the Republican party. The Campaign for Liberty and YAL are professional political organizations that will no doubt carry on in that role. I understand that is the path for some, and I respect that. It is not the path for me, and I hope those who disagree will be gracious enough to respect that as well. This site will not become the Daily Rand.

But what will become of this awesome community? Is this the end? What direction should the community take from here?..."

I don't see how the OP's post is bizarre. Maybe he didn't explain the situation thoroughly. Nystrom has asked for suggestions.

And even if he didn't...what's bizarre about trying to hold the DailyPaul's members together AND compete with an enemy of liberty?

Ah, that makes more sense. It doesn't sound though like Michael wants to start a news site like that. So, perhaps someone else should and advertise it with The Daily Paul and possibly here.
 
I am not about to go tell Michael and the people that are regulars there what they should do with their site.
 
Someone really needs to mow my lawn. It is getting out of hand and someone with more knowledge of my mower, and more motivation to mow should definitely do it before it gets any taller. Please PM me for directions to my house.

Pay attention folks thats arena champion material right there.
 
Some of the responses from the forum regulars are disappointing. Obviously something needs to be done to redirect the liberty movement towards sites named something other than, "Ron Paul".

Michael would do well to make a new site. In fact, you could make a living monetizing it if you kept the expenses low and the participation high. If he doesn't want to do it, someone else should step in. Fact is, something new needs to happen. Just not everyone is going to agree on everything.
 
Sounds to me like Nystron might be amenable to redirecting his traffic to the Liberty Forest. I assume this forum will again rebrand itself to promote that name once the election cycle has completed. We have a pretty good front page highlighting pertinent news items too. I'm sure there is room for tweaking it if there is a need to.
 
Some of the responses from the forum regulars are disappointing. Obviously something needs to be done to redirect the liberty movement towards sites named something other than, "Ron Paul".

Michael would do well to make a new site. In fact, you could make a living monetizing it if you kept the expenses low and the participation high. If he doesn't want to do it, someone else should step in. Fact is, something new needs to happen. Just not everyone is going to agree on everything.

whomever wants to can make a new site. Go for it.

I completely disagree WE, the RON PAUL movement, don't still need our Ron Paul sites. There are already other liberty movement sites and we go there too, but in the marketplace of ideas, people seem to go to the Ron Paul ones most. If Michael changed his site, the less used Ron Paul ones would pick up the slack. There is a MARKET for Ron Paul.
 
Back
Top