Chosen
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
- Messages
- 769
The Obama-christ preaches of humanism and charity, which in our society no longer do as they indicate, they have been transformed into shields which hide authoritarian collectivist goals. Using anarchy and disarray to propel their armies into action, they lure the simple and narcissistic alike with Utopian rhetoric and promise. The masses are cattle, burying their heads in the grass to avoid the fence. Anarchy is the temporary morality of the collectivist,violence their promise, subjugation their goal.
For the arts and man in logical struggle, this brainwashed concept of hegemony in collectivism is one of the most destructive forces imaginable for creative and individualistic purposes. Most do not even realize that they are participating in it, but most people have tracked anarchy in on their shoes, into their own homes while mistakenly viewing the filth as civility, which it is in fact nowhere near. This is a dangerous drug. To the brilliance of the communists (which really means 2 or 3 writers, Gramsci in particular) they knew how to manipulate civilization to bring about its demise and replace it with a society where no person has their own identity and are dominated by a uber strong national structure with one, state run information channel. We tend to view things with a childish sort of polarity, ie "thats leftwing" or "thats rightwing" and Europe has begun to adopt this idea, but you don't have to be a genius to realize that underneath there is absolutely no difference to these “wings,” fundamentally all they do is trumpet differing emotional responses dictated to them by the media who control the dialogue, tempo and subject matter for debate.
All information is controlled at the political level with regards to governmental functioning. So as far as those who wish to impose their will are concerned, the polarity of interpretation is an excellent tool. This new oppression is not overt, it is simplistic and muted. One thing that the globalists and transnationals have learned is that when you are assertive and direct about your wants, then you run the risk of allowing a tangible and organized resistance to your wants. These resistances have proven to be irritating to them and many a collectivist dream has perished as a result. The idea as presented by Antonio Gramsci (the Father of communist strategy)is to destroy the peoples identity in phases, take away their ability to feel connected to their surroundings and muzzle their free expression. He decided that there were 3 prongs of destruction. He called it "a long march thru the culture." He hoped to slowly destroy civilization by influencing academia at both the collegiate and grammar school levels, gaining control over media institutions and information outlets and then finally by influencing the judicial elements and elite institutions. Academia is a convenient backdoor to the political process and judiciary. Academics form "studies" which are referenced constantly by media and adopted by judiciaries and find their way then into legislation, many times without ever being truly tested! To achieve this the academics had to push hard the concept of moral relativism via post modernism. That is the idea that perception could be what you wanted it to be, but by the way, here is the perception you should have (and they present only one side). They found that people would (irritating to the elites) make comparative analysis to their foundations of understanding and the communists just couldn't have that, so they had to destroy everything individuals believe by giving it an immoral equivelency. When this void is created they make sure to fill it with an existence that does not contain the individual or the idea of individuality.
The goal of collectivsts is to create an endless flow of disparate and victimized humanity all with their own allegiances and striving to place themselves on the top of the pyramid-shaped victim/martyr shrine. One they get there via proclamation of victimization they are shielded by politically correct language , media supplementation, academic propaganda and entitlement programs, ALL in return for votes. And where does this globalist communism meet up with global corporatism? Their needs are identical. Under marketing, the best thing you can have is a highly identifiable demographic in a balkanized population. This makes things easy to market to. What corporations hate is informed consumers, what communists, collectivists and politicians hate is informed voters. The people that the communists pick up are the ones who are willing to expend their "purchases" thru emotional and narcissistic means , the global corporatists pick up people who make purchases thru products and proclaim their individuality (at least perceived by them) via these products, or more importantly, by the brand story surrounding the item. But in the end, the result is the same, a balkanized populous attended to by the same marketers for business and collectivist political interests. If you think that these illegal immigration and “social justice” marches and demonstrations are spontaneous, think again, they are ALL funded by special interests. These entities have long learned that creating the debate, then controlling the reactions and demonstrations to the debate is the most beneficial to them. They usually fund both.
Anyone ever react to this? Sure they do and they are quickly shoved into well prepared concentration camps of political correctness defined by collectivist academia, saturated on the public by agenda driven media and perpetuated by thick fog of war emanating from an endless supply of censorship and invasion of privacy. If you go to academia and the media for information then you get simply only what you "need" to know-collectivist ideas. Only if you have thru personal experience gained some sort insight then and only then would you be able to ascertain the truth. Usually the people who can do this come from a family background with strong parental elements and more often then not a father who is strong and a leader. This is rare in modern society and Gramsci knew that he had to get rid of the family to achieve this.
Borst said it best:
"Gramsci hated marriage and the family, the very founding blocks of a civilized society. To him, marriage was a plot, a conspiracy... to perpetuate an evil system that oppressed women and children. It was a dangerous institution, characterized by violence and exploitation, the forerunner of fascism and tyranny. Patriarchy served as the main target of the cultural Marxists. They strove to feminize the family with legions of single and homosexual mothers and fathers who would serve to weaken the structure of civilized society."
The frustration for Lenin and Gramsci was that the peasants were well connected to religion because it had given them a lifeline to endure the tragedies and massive unfairness of the real world. Christianity had given life to tons of humans who would have otherwise had no means of survival. The collectivists needed to break this bond, hence the Marxist propagandistic attack by calling religion the opiate of the masses. And this isn't an argument for the church in any context, but really the issue is that intelligent and free people had been unbound by the influence of the church in political life by the separation of church and state (at least in western democracies). I for one can easily dismiss the influences of the modern church thru intellect, but I like the ritualization that it has produced in a cultural context-like Christmas. Really the Marxists want to destroy only the influence of Christianity because it pertains to western civilization and this is ONLY done to gain control over the masses, not for moral purposes. Every time a collectivist zealot is attacking the church on a "moral" ground they are empowering the enemies of western civilization by not attacking them equally and this is what the collectivist authoritarians want. This is why they champion illegal and legal massive immigration from third world illiterates, it has a destructive effect on identity-this should be clear by now. Authoritarian collectivists believe that if an individual needs religion, it doesn't need to be the common church, it could also be environmentalism or any other trend that feeds their narcissistic desires and makes decisions for them. The collectivists want massive dependency on a state system that feeds them their new religion of cultural robotics, global corporations want the same.
To speak “evil” to these global zealots one only has to say:
"you are responsible for your own actions."
This is the true nature of the new religion, death of identity, the state as life. The new false prophet will easily sacrifice the individual on the altar of history and burn it to the ground. Authoritarian collectivism is but one week from emerging as our master and we will only have our simple selves to blame. Rise up against the new messiah and stand for the individual or know that no participation, no revolution, is enabling the death of history and the rise of the false utopia.
Do not be a slave. Join the Sons of Liberty today, fight back. Own the night, ensure the dawn.
For the arts and man in logical struggle, this brainwashed concept of hegemony in collectivism is one of the most destructive forces imaginable for creative and individualistic purposes. Most do not even realize that they are participating in it, but most people have tracked anarchy in on their shoes, into their own homes while mistakenly viewing the filth as civility, which it is in fact nowhere near. This is a dangerous drug. To the brilliance of the communists (which really means 2 or 3 writers, Gramsci in particular) they knew how to manipulate civilization to bring about its demise and replace it with a society where no person has their own identity and are dominated by a uber strong national structure with one, state run information channel. We tend to view things with a childish sort of polarity, ie "thats leftwing" or "thats rightwing" and Europe has begun to adopt this idea, but you don't have to be a genius to realize that underneath there is absolutely no difference to these “wings,” fundamentally all they do is trumpet differing emotional responses dictated to them by the media who control the dialogue, tempo and subject matter for debate.
All information is controlled at the political level with regards to governmental functioning. So as far as those who wish to impose their will are concerned, the polarity of interpretation is an excellent tool. This new oppression is not overt, it is simplistic and muted. One thing that the globalists and transnationals have learned is that when you are assertive and direct about your wants, then you run the risk of allowing a tangible and organized resistance to your wants. These resistances have proven to be irritating to them and many a collectivist dream has perished as a result. The idea as presented by Antonio Gramsci (the Father of communist strategy)is to destroy the peoples identity in phases, take away their ability to feel connected to their surroundings and muzzle their free expression. He decided that there were 3 prongs of destruction. He called it "a long march thru the culture." He hoped to slowly destroy civilization by influencing academia at both the collegiate and grammar school levels, gaining control over media institutions and information outlets and then finally by influencing the judicial elements and elite institutions. Academia is a convenient backdoor to the political process and judiciary. Academics form "studies" which are referenced constantly by media and adopted by judiciaries and find their way then into legislation, many times without ever being truly tested! To achieve this the academics had to push hard the concept of moral relativism via post modernism. That is the idea that perception could be what you wanted it to be, but by the way, here is the perception you should have (and they present only one side). They found that people would (irritating to the elites) make comparative analysis to their foundations of understanding and the communists just couldn't have that, so they had to destroy everything individuals believe by giving it an immoral equivelency. When this void is created they make sure to fill it with an existence that does not contain the individual or the idea of individuality.
The goal of collectivsts is to create an endless flow of disparate and victimized humanity all with their own allegiances and striving to place themselves on the top of the pyramid-shaped victim/martyr shrine. One they get there via proclamation of victimization they are shielded by politically correct language , media supplementation, academic propaganda and entitlement programs, ALL in return for votes. And where does this globalist communism meet up with global corporatism? Their needs are identical. Under marketing, the best thing you can have is a highly identifiable demographic in a balkanized population. This makes things easy to market to. What corporations hate is informed consumers, what communists, collectivists and politicians hate is informed voters. The people that the communists pick up are the ones who are willing to expend their "purchases" thru emotional and narcissistic means , the global corporatists pick up people who make purchases thru products and proclaim their individuality (at least perceived by them) via these products, or more importantly, by the brand story surrounding the item. But in the end, the result is the same, a balkanized populous attended to by the same marketers for business and collectivist political interests. If you think that these illegal immigration and “social justice” marches and demonstrations are spontaneous, think again, they are ALL funded by special interests. These entities have long learned that creating the debate, then controlling the reactions and demonstrations to the debate is the most beneficial to them. They usually fund both.
Anyone ever react to this? Sure they do and they are quickly shoved into well prepared concentration camps of political correctness defined by collectivist academia, saturated on the public by agenda driven media and perpetuated by thick fog of war emanating from an endless supply of censorship and invasion of privacy. If you go to academia and the media for information then you get simply only what you "need" to know-collectivist ideas. Only if you have thru personal experience gained some sort insight then and only then would you be able to ascertain the truth. Usually the people who can do this come from a family background with strong parental elements and more often then not a father who is strong and a leader. This is rare in modern society and Gramsci knew that he had to get rid of the family to achieve this.
Borst said it best:
"Gramsci hated marriage and the family, the very founding blocks of a civilized society. To him, marriage was a plot, a conspiracy... to perpetuate an evil system that oppressed women and children. It was a dangerous institution, characterized by violence and exploitation, the forerunner of fascism and tyranny. Patriarchy served as the main target of the cultural Marxists. They strove to feminize the family with legions of single and homosexual mothers and fathers who would serve to weaken the structure of civilized society."
The frustration for Lenin and Gramsci was that the peasants were well connected to religion because it had given them a lifeline to endure the tragedies and massive unfairness of the real world. Christianity had given life to tons of humans who would have otherwise had no means of survival. The collectivists needed to break this bond, hence the Marxist propagandistic attack by calling religion the opiate of the masses. And this isn't an argument for the church in any context, but really the issue is that intelligent and free people had been unbound by the influence of the church in political life by the separation of church and state (at least in western democracies). I for one can easily dismiss the influences of the modern church thru intellect, but I like the ritualization that it has produced in a cultural context-like Christmas. Really the Marxists want to destroy only the influence of Christianity because it pertains to western civilization and this is ONLY done to gain control over the masses, not for moral purposes. Every time a collectivist zealot is attacking the church on a "moral" ground they are empowering the enemies of western civilization by not attacking them equally and this is what the collectivist authoritarians want. This is why they champion illegal and legal massive immigration from third world illiterates, it has a destructive effect on identity-this should be clear by now. Authoritarian collectivists believe that if an individual needs religion, it doesn't need to be the common church, it could also be environmentalism or any other trend that feeds their narcissistic desires and makes decisions for them. The collectivists want massive dependency on a state system that feeds them their new religion of cultural robotics, global corporations want the same.
To speak “evil” to these global zealots one only has to say:
"you are responsible for your own actions."
This is the true nature of the new religion, death of identity, the state as life. The new false prophet will easily sacrifice the individual on the altar of history and burn it to the ground. Authoritarian collectivism is but one week from emerging as our master and we will only have our simple selves to blame. Rise up against the new messiah and stand for the individual or know that no participation, no revolution, is enabling the death of history and the rise of the false utopia.
Do not be a slave. Join the Sons of Liberty today, fight back. Own the night, ensure the dawn.
