- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 63,476
Johnstone says they don't want him gone. You say they do. Johnstone says they're fine with voter dissatisfaction, so long as they can keep even dissatisfied voters electing Approved Candidates. You say they cannot tolerate dissent. And still you claim to agree with the lady, and deny your obvious cognitive dissonance. Then you accuse me of lashing out. Well, I do--at obnoxiousness and spamming. If the main purveyors if your point of view depend on those tactics, and you haven't noticed, that's cognitive dissonance too.
And I suppose you never notice how you enforce your cognitive dissonance, either.
Well, you and the admins may suit yourselves.
What was it Mencken said about idiots and democracy?
She said they would rather have someone other than Trump. I agree. She said the impeachment and Russiagate was a farce. I agree.
Johnstone says they're fine with voter dissatisfaction, so long as they can keep even dissatisfied voters electing Approved Candidates.
You’ll have to specify where she said that. I didn’t see that.
As far as your lashing out, you have been suffering from severe TDS since Trump won the primary. You are emotional and irrational about it. And don’t put everyone in the same category and call them “spammer”. We have all types of people here, some outside of pure libertarian thought. Some of us tend to be more in agreement with Ron Paul, Rand Paul and Thomas Massie. We have some who are more in agreement with Justin Amash. But reasonable and rational people do not lash out over those subtle differences.
And you ignored the other thread were we might be in agreement. Why is that? Any agreement with what is the “enemy” (in your mind) is not allowed?