The Economist on Ron Paul

[billv]

http://www.economist.com/world/na/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9200887

During the debate Ron Paul, a feisty libertarian from Texas who stands no chance at all, suggested that Middle Eastern terrorists attacked America “because we've been over there;

 

[billv]

It's interesting how Dr. Paul keeps getting no chance at all attached to his name, isn't it.

 

[qednick]

Who owns it?

 

[romelll]

I agree. I expect better from them

 

[TheDuke]

I have a subscription on The Economist and I think it's a fair and balanced magazine. They aren't scared adressing issues in both the republican and democratic party.

Anyway, they haven't really given any comments on Ron Paul, just wanna give the readers the chance to form an opinion about it.

 

[Hawaii Libertarian]

The Economist

This magazine, like National Review, masquerades as a "conservative" (sic) publication, but all it's good for is supporting the elitist, globalist, neocon agenda of the establishment, so I never pay any attention to its political opinions. I occasionally read it if I find a free copy left on an airplane, but I would never waste my own money on such a rag. I would never expect Dr. Paul and his libertarian economic ideas to get a fair hearing in a Keynesian publication like the Economist, that's for sure.