It is important to distinguish between government-as-such and the State-principle, which is privilege. Privilege can be summed up as "rules for thee, but not for me." The essence of privilege is the double-standard.
Thus, the solution to the State is to have just one law -- what's good for any goose is good for all ganders. To put it another way, if the State asserts that it has some "right", then it simultaneously asserts that all law-abiding citizens also have that same right. If that results in absurdity, then that is proof that the government can have no such "right". This can also be called "mutuality" or "universalizability". An arrest-power has always been recognized within natural law. It will sometimes become necessary to restrain an individual who has become disorderly, lewd or violent in the public space. In private space, he can just be trespassed. But there really isn't a way to trespass people from the public space. So that's why you sometimes need arrest. The power of arrest that is used by public police is, therefore, a derivative of this common law power. "Citizen arrest" isn't just a quirky weird legal category, rather, it is the true legal foundation of the arrest power of the public police.
To be clear, there is no point arguing this within the government's own courts. Government courts are part of the hat-trick... they're an essential component to building expansive State privileges. Without government courts, there could be no expansive State privileges, particularly including socialistic redistribution measures. It is important to realize that everyone who is attached to the State apparatus and enjoying privileges from the State, directly or indirectly, is actually a socialist no matter what economic theories they pronounce with their lips. In other words, virtually all Republicans and other conservatives are socialists
Freeing law from the grip of socialization will be an essential step for humanity to move past this "Great Reset"/NWO globalism into a future of true freedom. If that future is ever to come about, it can only come about on the basis of free law. If free citizens under free law establish a government to pick up the trash, deliver the mail and check the identity of people entering at their border, so be it. There is nothing inherently criminal about that. But as soon as these public servants begin to imagine themselves as kings and gods, and to hand down Olympian "mandates", they have simply become tyrants. We can hope that the tyrants will be discouraged from their tyrannical aims by the realization that they are really rousing a Leviathan they never before imagined. But if not, then they will go the way of all things which attempt to contradict logic and causality itself.
