FreedomRings
Member
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2007
- Messages
- 371
"taking back the entire Republican party" - that's a quote from Ron's post today.
The more I think about it, the more I come to realize that this is the only viable option because a large percentage of the masses have been brainwashed into voting for one of the two major parties. It would probably takes decades to overcome this bias.
I'm very confident that as grassroots supporters we could cordially nudge Ron to run as an independent, even at this point. But would that be in the revolution's best interest?
The revolution and its ideas would get some additional publicity that way, but the intellectual message of "non-interventionism, no handouts, sound money" may have reached its peak at 10% to 15% or so. Anything above that would be a great success but still not enough to win.
So if Ron does run as an independent and gets 15% or even 20%, then what? Not much would have changed compared to right now. We'd be happy but as far from the WH as ever. (Correct me if I'm wrong.)
On the other hand, if we stay within the GOP, then only a fraction of those 15% could make a big difference if they actively work on nurturing a silent revolution that works from the ground up (local level first).
Thoughts?
BTW, this weekend I read a book by a UK libertarian who looks at the same issue (retaking a major party) from a UK point of view. It's a quick read and very instructive even though the situation on the ground is different in the UK.
Cultural Revolution, Culture War: How Conservatives Lost England, and How to Get It Back (by Sean Gabb)
The more I think about it, the more I come to realize that this is the only viable option because a large percentage of the masses have been brainwashed into voting for one of the two major parties. It would probably takes decades to overcome this bias.
I'm very confident that as grassroots supporters we could cordially nudge Ron to run as an independent, even at this point. But would that be in the revolution's best interest?
The revolution and its ideas would get some additional publicity that way, but the intellectual message of "non-interventionism, no handouts, sound money" may have reached its peak at 10% to 15% or so. Anything above that would be a great success but still not enough to win.
So if Ron does run as an independent and gets 15% or even 20%, then what? Not much would have changed compared to right now. We'd be happy but as far from the WH as ever. (Correct me if I'm wrong.)
On the other hand, if we stay within the GOP, then only a fraction of those 15% could make a big difference if they actively work on nurturing a silent revolution that works from the ground up (local level first).
Thoughts?
BTW, this weekend I read a book by a UK libertarian who looks at the same issue (retaking a major party) from a UK point of view. It's a quick read and very instructive even though the situation on the ground is different in the UK.
Cultural Revolution, Culture War: How Conservatives Lost England, and How to Get It Back (by Sean Gabb)