:o:oWe the people have shown overwhelming support for the campaign finance laws to match funds through taxation. Congress is allowed to tax and divide the funds "disproportionate" as they see fit. PER THE CONSTITUTION!:o:o
You believe in the constitution as a living document, well - support the amendment to include the matching funds for marginal candidates.
This was specifically designed to help marginal candidates fight the system.
WHY DEAR GOD DO YOU DISENFRANCHISE US BY NOT TAKING IT???
Are you feeling like it will cause taxes or be a target for your "No raising taxes"?
Com'n ...earmarks is already out there and "How is this against the constitution? Appropriating funds will always be there and campaign finance, public polls, media and their RICO implications can be your own proposed amendment.
People can't hear what the boob-tube never says. Start throwing huge sums of money at educating america.
I hereby pledge my tax share to the matching funds of your campaign. Feel better?
You believe in the constitution as a living document, well - support the amendment to include the matching funds for marginal candidates.
This was specifically designed to help marginal candidates fight the system.
WHY DEAR GOD DO YOU DISENFRANCHISE US BY NOT TAKING IT??? Are you feeling like it will cause taxes or be a target for your "No raising taxes"?
Com'n ...earmarks is already out there and "How is this against the constitution? Appropriating funds will always be there and campaign finance, public polls, media and their RICO implications can be your own proposed amendment. People can't hear what the boob-tube never says. Start throwing huge sums of money at educating america.
I hereby pledge my tax share to the matching funds of your campaign. Feel better?